• 1 Votes
    13 Posts
    2k Views
    1

    @obsolesce said in Standard Email Signatures in Office 365 with Embedded Images:

    @pete-s you need to fix that...

    Done.

  • Error creating project, XSRF check failed on Jira

    Solved
    18
    0 Votes
    18 Posts
    5k Views
    scottalanmillerS

    For those coming along later, here is the exact server.xml that works:

    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <!-- Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. --> <Server port="8005" shutdown="SHUTDOWN"> <Listener className="org.apache.catalina.startup.VersionLoggerListener"/> <Listener className="org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener" SSLEngine="on"/> <Listener className="org.apache.catalina.core.JreMemoryLeakPreventionListener"/> <Listener className="org.apache.catalina.mbeans.GlobalResourcesLifecycleListener"/> <Listener className="org.apache.catalina.core.ThreadLocalLeakPreventionListener"/> <Service name="Catalina"> <!-- ============================================================================================================== DEFAULT - Direct connector with no proxy for unproxied access to Jira. If using a http/https proxy, comment out this connector. ============================================================================================================== --> <!-- <Connector port="8080" maxThreads="150" minSpareThreads="25" connectionTimeout="20000" enableLookups="false" maxHttpHeaderSize="8192" protocol="HTTP/1.1" useBodyEncodingForURI="true" redirectPort="8443" acceptCount="100" disableUploadTimeout="true" bindOnInit="false"/> --> <!-- ============================================================================================================== HTTP - Proxying Jira via Apache or Nginx over HTTP If you're proxying traffic to Jira over HTTP, uncomment the below connector and comment out the others. Ensure the proxyName and proxyPort are updated with the appropriate information if necessary as per the docs. See the following for more information: Apache - https://confluence.atlassian.com/x/4xQLM nginx - https://confluence.atlassian.com/x/DAFmGQ ============================================================================================================== --> <!-- <Connector port="8080" maxThreads="150" minSpareThreads="25" connectionTimeout="20000" enableLookups="false" maxHttpHeaderSize="8192" protocol="HTTP/1.1" useBodyEncodingForURI="true" redirectPort="8443" acceptCount="100" disableUploadTimeout="true" bindOnInit="false" scheme="http" proxyName="jira.a-closer-look.com" proxyPort="80"/> --> <!-- ============================================================================================================== HTTPS - Proxying Jira via Apache or Nginx over HTTPS If you're proxying traffic to Jira over HTTPS, uncomment the below connector and comment out the others. Ensure the proxyName and proxyPort are updated with the appropriate information if necessary as per the docs. See the following for more information: Apache - https://confluence.atlassian.com/x/PTT3MQ nginx - https://confluence.atlassian.com/x/DAFmGQ ============================================================================================================== --> <Connector port="8080" maxThreads="150" minSpareThreads="25" connectionTimeout="20000" enableLookups="false" maxHttpHeaderSize="8192" protocol="HTTP/1.1" useBodyEncodingForURI="true" acceptCount="100" disableUploadTimeout="true" bindOnInit="false" secure="true" scheme="https" proxyName="jira.a-closer-look.com" proxyPort="443"/> <!-- ============================================================================================================== AJP - Proxying Jira via Apache over HTTP or HTTPS If you're proxying traffic to Jira using the AJP protocol, uncomment the following connector line See the following for more information: Apache - https://confluence.atlassian.com/x/QiJ9MQ ============================================================================================================== --> <!-- <Connector port="8009" URIEncoding="UTF-8" enableLookups="false" protocol="AJP/1.3" /> --> <Engine name="Catalina" defaultHost="localhost"> <Host name="localhost" appBase="webapps" unpackWARs="true" autoDeploy="true"> <Context path="" docBase="${catalina.home}/atlassian-jira" reloadable="false" useHttpOnly="true"> <Resource name="UserTransaction" auth="Container" type="javax.transaction.UserTransaction" factory="org.objectweb.jotm.UserTransactionFactory" jotm.timeout="60"/> <Manager pathname=""/> <JarScanner scanManifest="false"/> </Context> </Host> <Valve className="org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve" pattern="%a %{jira.request.id}r %{jira.request.username}r %t &quot;%m %U%q %H&quot; %s %b %D &quot;%{Referer}i&quot; &quot;%{User-Agent}i&quot; &quot;%{jira.request.assession.id}r&quot;"/> </Engine> </Service> </Server>
  • Yealink device common config filename list

    1
    4 Votes
    1 Posts
    879 Views
    No one has replied
  • Testing SkySilk

    31
    0 Votes
    31 Posts
    2k Views
    M

    Hi everyone, Matt from SkySilk here! (apologies for the long post, please bear with me, I promise future responses will be shorter) I wanted to make sure everyone’s comments are addressed…I’ll post a TLDR and then the expanded response below.

    @aaronstuder thanks for checking us out and sharing our link here! We take all user feedback to heart and enjoy seeing what people have to say about our new platform.

    @scottalanmiller Thanks for your feedback, glad you enjoy the option to choose your own processor!

    TLDR; At this time we only offer LXC containers for better machine performance, we have a whole host of different features and products in the works. Please contact me if you would like to get a trial account to run some benchmarks I will be more than happy to assist. openSUSE - This distro was the least popular out of all templates provided during our beta, so as you can imagine it’s not at the top of our list. Over 20,000 VPS spun off and this template was less than 1%. That said we like feedback and will try to facilitate individual requests whenever possible. Ceph is way more robust than using a Raid10 in a larger environment (in our experience), which is why we’ve opted to go that route. While a true OS re-install doesn't exist yet (we're working on it), you can workaround that by immediately taking a snapshot after deploying and using that as a way to reset your VPS to a clean state if you don't want to delete/re-deploy. Expanded Response:

    True, we only offer OpenSuse Leap and it is two versions old - we have decided to focus on the crowd favorites (or at least based on the feedback from our beta users) which have been Ubuntu and CentOS. We are working hard towards providing a wider range of distros to choose from, as well as turn-key and custom applications. That said, we do appreciate feedback and can prioritize certain distros if anyone makes a request.

    I am glad that you noticed we use Ceph in lieu of RAID. We use Ceph for our clustered storage backend with a triple replicated RBD pool. Unlike RAID, this means your block storage device is online even if a node falls down (or gets shot by the other nodes[1]). While the performance may not be the same as RAID10, we feel that data safety and high-availability take precedence.

    On to your next point, all software and technology comes with trials and tribulations, that said, Proxmox is most definitely worthy of being the backbone of SkySilk. It provides full cluster management, failover capabilities, a rather strict enforcement of secured multi-tenancy[2], and an expansive API upon which we have been able to develop a robust and stable cloud platform. When you have multiple clusters in different regions, a management layer that recovers from a node fault in the middle of the night is a godsend. Plus it isn’t particularly bloated and doesn’t require a license to press the power button.

    By the way, there is no harm in running a composite LXC + KVM environment on the same hardware, we just have to be diligent with resource provisioning so that we can guarantee quality of service. That said, KVM and custom ISO offerings are on the docket, and will most likely be served on better hardware. And hopefully Windows as well. For now though, we only offer LXC because the reduced overhead of containers allows us to squeeze just a little bit more value out of our hardware. Interestingly, this also translates into performance benefits for our users at the expense of being locked into a specific kernel version.

    True, we do not currently support the ability to re-install an OS but it is coming on our future features list. As a workaround, users can always take a snapshot and use that to revert to a clean OS state. And as referenced above, if you are in need of something specific as far as images or distros go we encourage you to reach out so we know what to prioritize.

    As for the stability of our product and our ability to support it, we have just finished an extensive beta testing period that saw over 20,000 LXC container deployments by selected beta testers. We have thoroughly vetted & tested our platform to the point where it is now a quality, production-ready product we are extremely proud of and understand how to support well.

    That’s not to say we don’t have areas where we can improve; we know that’s the case without a doubt, and are working hard to grow our team and platform at the same time. In that same vein, our approach up to this point has been anything but lazy, and we don’t plan on changing that any time soon. 🙂

    Footnotes:
    [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STONITH
    [2] If you can’t get your software to run feel free to reach out to support, we do grant more leash for certain use cases.

  • Beware of significant VM host overhead using NVMe drives

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    1

    PS. I had a look on the guest side of thing just now because that is what Microsoft talked about.

    Most OSs are virtualization aware. I had a look at debian running as guest under Xen with a clean install without any Xen guest tools. Debian installation automatically sense it's running on virtualized hardware and sets it's I/O scheduler to "none", thereby letting the host handle whatever I/O scheduling needed. This also makes sense because the guest doesn't know what kind of storage the host is using.

  • Rookie question: adding disk to centos KVM host

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    906 Views
    1

    Thanks to you guys I got it sorted out now!

  • Windows 10 1803 and SAP Client

    21
    0 Votes
    21 Posts
    3k Views
    scottalanmillerS

    I wonder if we move to RDS on 2016 if it would make any difference, with both sides of the RDP connection updated to the latest?

  • 2 Votes
    40 Posts
    4k Views
    scottalanmillerS

    @jnaugle also worth noting, no one actually delivers PRI today, that entire market is a scam. It's actually SIP and then they translate the SIP to PRI on your network edge to make it "sound cool" for people who are out of date and remember when PRI was both still available and actually practical (early 1990s and earlier.) PRI is not nearly as powerful as SIP, nor as cheap, so phone providers long ago "all" moved to providing SIP instead (PRI isn't possible without a physical T1) and "virtualizing" PRI on top of it. All the PRI does it increase cost and lower performance, flexibility and reliability.

    So the best solution is to get the phone provider to stop pretending to do PRI and just give you the raw SIP. This improves your phone quality by removing unnecessary steps and limitations, removes the need for you to convert back to SIP (gateway, card, however you do it) and makes everything better for everyone. The PRI interface has no advantages, only disadvantages. It takes the better SIP, and cripples it.

    For people running ancient phone systems from before VoIP, SIP isn't possible, so these terrible PRI interfaces are useful for them to continue to be able to hook up those ancient phone systems while still being able to connect to current phone companies. They aren't totally useless, but they are useful only for that one terrible niche case.

  • Spiceworld Ticket

    7
    2 Votes
    7 Posts
    450 Views
    scottalanmillerS

    That didn't take long to find a buyer.

  • cordless VoIP

    11
    1 Votes
    11 Posts
    1k Views
    JaredBuschJ

    @scottalanmiller said in cordless VoIP:

    @mike-davis said in cordless VoIP:

    @jaredbusch said in cordless VoIP:

    The W60P is $128 vs the W52P for $108.
    What is it that makes you want to pay $20 more per phone?
    edit: That is the cost of a single handset with a base station

    Mostly I'd like to play with it. I'm willing to pay the extra $20 for that.

    BTW, where are you getting those prices? Amazon prime is ~ $170 others are around $140 before shipping.

    Probably Baltic

    Bingo. They seem sto have the best "consistent" pricing. Sometimes Amazon is better, sometimes not, when shipping is added.

  • ScreenConnect?

    16
    1 Votes
    16 Posts
    1k Views
    A

    +1 on ScreenConnect being awesome. Here are my top five:

    allows support to remote in to a client user's machine in under five seconds can configure users as support agents with limited rights such that they can only log in to their own computer. Handy for those who occasionally need to remote their computer, either from home or elsewhere. Android and iPhone/Pad apps. customizable to your company look/feel including colors & logos ad-hoc remote sessions with emailed invitations for systems that do not have a client installed

    The version I use requires a small client (<2 MB) installed on the controlling machine, though all access is through a web browser.

  • 3 Votes
    66 Posts
    8k Views
    FATeknollogeeF

    Playing around with OBS Studio: DNF Auto Update

    Youtube Video

  • spam filter ~ What do you use?

    13
    2 Votes
    13 Posts
    1k Views
    travisdh1T

    @mike-davis said in spam filter ~ What do you use?:

    @karlita said in spam filter ~ What do you use?:

    I don´t even check them, just delete them.

    I think people here are looking for domain wide solutions that protect end users from phishing attacks and the like. You may be able to spot a phishing email, but many end users fail....

    Yep. Knowbe4 just helps us prove it.

  • 0 Votes
    15 Posts
    2k Views
    DustinB3403D

    So this has been changed in their newest release 2.0.0.25 (not sure if it's publically available), and while the credentials are no longer in plain-text there are a few things you lose the ability to do.

    Namely to tell if any given used is logged into a device, and secondly to sign in/out as a user on any given device.

    I've provided my feedback to Yealink and hope to hear back soon. Neither of the above 2 issues are deal breakers, as the bigger goal is to be able to set configuration options, screensavers, time servers etc and have the user deal with the login.

    Especially since the "Web Sign in" functionality is so simple, there is little reason to need the ability to sign in for a user.

  • Cloudflare and Nginx reverse proxy background.

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    travisdh1T

    @taurex said in Cloudflare and Nginx reverse proxy background.:

    @travisdh1 Are there any benefits of configuring your own reverse-proxy if it's running behind CloudFlare that is essentially the one already? I know they offer their own Origin CA certs that you can install on your web servers to encrypt the traffic between CF and your cloud. As long as you're happy to stick with CloudFlare, there will be no need to run cron jobs with certbot renewals every 3 months.

    As @JaredBusch said, you can run self-signed certs with CloudFlare just fine. This was for my home lab, so I purposely do things the hard way sometimes, just to see what it's like. That's why I originally tackled this anyway. Running a reverse proxy mostly so I don't have to pay for nearly 30 IP addresses on the box I rent for it.

  • Leaving connected to Docking Station even full Charge

    3
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    452 Views
    J

    Thank you very much Sir.

  • 2 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    stacksofplatesS

    Wow this must be an old server. pam_tally was replaced with faillock in RHEL 6.

  • zimbra 8.5 (Vmware) to zimbra 8.5 (AWS,Azure) migrate

    8
    1 Votes
    8 Posts
    736 Views
    dbeatoD

    For AWS and Azure you can Import your VMs too (Can be tedious at times, specially Azure)
    https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/vm-import/
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-ie/migrate-vmware-to-azure.aspx

  • 7 Votes
    9 Posts
    3k Views
    gjacobseG

    The batch file I have for one client is this:

    powershell Rename-Computer -NewName "COMPUTER_NAME" -DomainCredential DOMAIN\ADMINUser -Restart

    Where COMPUTER_NAME to not exceed the 15 character limit

    ETA:
    I should add that this batch script start with installing Chocolatey package management tools, then the default applications,

  • 2 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    FATeknollogeeF

    @romo said in Remote Connect/Support Tools for Fedora, Windows, OS X:

    Seems really interesting with the monitoring and the ability to have custom alerts.

    @FATeknollogee How has the testing been going?

    Haven't done much more than my OP.
    I plan to do some more testing over the weekend.
    My main goal is to find a ScreenConnect replacement.