ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Topics
    2. Tags
    3. xenserver
    Log in to post
    • All categories
    • OksanaO

      Breaking Down Barriers: XCP-ng Offers Open-Source Power Over VMware

      Starwind
      • starwind vmware xenserver virtualization • • Oksana
      4
      3
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      351
      Views

      olivierO

      Happy to see XCP-ng's name back in here 👋

    • OksanaO

      Migrate a VM from XenServer to Hyper-V with StarWind V2V Converter

      Starwind
      • starwind hyper-v xenserver v2v converter • • Oksana
      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      274
      Views

      No one has replied

    • OksanaO

      Migrate VMs from XenServer to VMware for Free with StarWind

      Starwind
      • v2v p2v starwind starwind v2v kvm xenserver esx vsphere • • Oksana
      1
      1
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      482
      Views

      No one has replied

    • OksanaO

      Convert Between Popular VM Formats for Free with StarWind

      Starwind
      • v2v converter xenserver hyper-v hypervisor p2v starwind • • Oksana
      1
      1
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      449
      Views

      No one has replied

    • 1

      Installing XCP-ng using a Windows PC

      IT Discussion
      • xcp-ng xencenter xenserver • • 1337
      7
      3
      Votes
      7
      Posts
      5.7k
      Views

      dbeatoD

      Also another thing is that XCP-ng it is finally able to support UEFI boot which was nice.

    • FATeknollogeeF

      Hypervisors: revisit your choices!

      IT Discussion
      • hypervisors esxi kvm hyper-v xenserver type 1 • • FATeknollogee
      36
      1
      Votes
      36
      Posts
      3.2k
      Views

      JaredBuschJ

      @FATeknollogee said in Hypervisors: revisit your choices!:

      One downside to KVM (in virt-manager) is lack of snapshots for UEFI VMs.

      yes it is.

    • DustinB3403D

      Dashrender why did you migrate to Hyper-V from XenServer

      IT Discussion
      • hyper-v xen xenserver virtualization hypervisor • • DustinB3403
      30
      1
      Votes
      30
      Posts
      2.6k
      Views

      S

      @JaredBusch said in Dashrender why did you migrate to Hyper-V from XenServer:

      The XCP-NG team is a team that had a horrible business model that they were trying to implement around XenServer (XOA). Great concept, poor business model.

      I wish them well but they are fighting a few things...

      Citrix couldn't make any real money even when they charged more and people were taking the product seriously.

      Last time I checked they were just replacing some management components and packaging some storage stuff. They are not investing in upstream and there's a lot of... changes coming in hardware that are going to require non-trivial investments for hypervisors to remain relevant.

      The real problem with Xen is upstream investment is drying up. Citrix has pulled back, Amazon and other cloud providers have moved on to KVM, SuSE doesn't even market virtualization (SAP HANA support, containers, OS is as close to bare metal as they get). Outside of some people in ARM/automotive virtualization I haven't seen anyone picking it up for net new projects. In the enterprise Oracle is the only champion of it these days. KVM won the open source hypervisor war (although at this point does anyone really care?)

    • travisdh1T

      XCP-NG/XenServer tapdisk error

      IT Discussion
      • xenserver xcp-ng tapdisk xen • • travisdh1
      10
      1
      Votes
      10
      Posts
      2.0k
      Views

      travisdh1T

      @Danp said in XCP-NG/XenServer tapdisk error:

      It's a bug... see https://mailchi.mp/7ed52f9a2151/important-noticeopenvswitch-issue

      Sure enough, that was it.

    • 1

      Which hosts belong in what pool when running local storage?

      IT Discussion
      • xenserver xen xcp-ng • • 1337
      27
      3
      Votes
      27
      Posts
      2.3k
      Views

      1

      So to answer my own question:
      "Which hosts belong in what pool when running local storage?"

      The answer is none - at least with xenserver. Don't use pools when using local storage.

    • 1

      Beware of significant VM host overhead using NVMe drives

      IT Discussion
      • nvme ssd kvm xenserver • • 1337
      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      2.3k
      Views

      1

      PS. I had a look on the guest side of thing just now because that is what Microsoft talked about.

      Most OSs are virtualization aware. I had a look at debian running as guest under Xen with a clean install without any Xen guest tools. Debian installation automatically sense it's running on virtualized hardware and sets it's I/O scheduler to "none", thereby letting the host handle whatever I/O scheduling needed. This also makes sense because the guest doesn't know what kind of storage the host is using.

    • 1

      Solved Attach drive to VM in Xenserver (not as Storage Repository)

      IT Discussion
      • xenserver xcp-ng xen • • 1337
      6
      0
      Votes
      6
      Posts
      5.4k
      Views

      1

      Thanks guys.

      Unfortunately the link @dbeato provided is how you add a new disk to xenserver when you want it to be Storage Repository - a place to store VM partitions. So if you have a disk already xenserver will wipe it clean and put LVMs or EXT3 with VDI files on it.

      When it's passed through as a block device to a VM it will have whatever filesystem the VM formats it with.

      The problem with the info in the link @black3dynamite provided is that it's for xenserver 5.x so it doesn't work straight up with Xenserver 7.x (I'm running 7.4).

      What I ended up doing was adding a raid 1 array instead of just a disk. The principle is the same though, just another name on the block device.

      The array /dev/md0 is passed through to the VM as a block device.

      I did it by adding a rule to /etc/udev/rules.d/65-md-incremental.rules almost at the end.

      KERNEL=="md*", SUBSYSTEM=="block", ACTION=="change", SYMLINK+="xapi/block/%k", \ RUN+="/bin/sh -c '/opt/xensource/libexec/local-device-change %k 2>&1 >/dev/null&'"

      This rule will pass all md arrays to the VMs as Removable Storage in Xenserver (so you can attach it to whatever VM you want).

      Note that * in KERNEL=="md*" is a wildcard. So this will match the devices /dev/md0, md1 md2 etc. Just replace md* with whatever block device you want to pass through.

      The array is 2TB so I don't know if this works with bigger arrays.
      After trying some larger drives I can verify that it works fine with larger than 2TB arrays.
      Also the disks were empty so I'm not sure if xenserver will wipe the disk when you set this up the first time.
      After some experimenting it looks like Xenserver will not touch the drive.

      I'll add the complete file for reference.

      KERNEL=="td[a-z]*", GOTO="md_end" # This file causes block devices with Linux RAID (mdadm) signatures to # automatically cause mdadm to be run. # See udev(8) for syntax # Don't process any events if anaconda is running as anaconda brings up # raid devices manually ENV{ANACONDA}=="?*", GOTO="md_end" # Also don't process disks that are slated to be a multipath device ENV{DM_MULTIPATH_DEVICE_PATH}=="?*", GOTO="md_end" # We process add events on block devices (since they are ready as soon as # they are added to the system), but we must process change events as well # on any dm devices (like LUKS partitions or LVM logical volumes) and on # md devices because both of these first get added, then get brought live # and trigger a change event. The reason we don't process change events # on bare hard disks is because if you stop all arrays on a disk, then # run fdisk on the disk to change the partitions, when fdisk exits it # triggers a change event, and we want to wait until all the fdisks on # all member disks are done before we do anything. Unfortunately, we have # no way of knowing that, so we just have to let those arrays be brought # up manually after fdisk has been run on all of the disks. # First, process all add events (md and dm devices will not really do # anything here, just regular disks, and this also won't get any imsm # array members either) SUBSYSTEM=="block", ACTION=="add", ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="linux_raid_member", \ RUN+="/sbin/mdadm -I $env{DEVNAME}" # Next, check to make sure the BIOS raid stuff wasn't turned off via cmdline IMPORT{cmdline}="noiswmd" IMPORT{cmdline}="nodmraid" ENV{noiswmd}=="?*", GOTO="md_imsm_inc_end" ENV{nodmraid}=="?*", GOTO="md_imsm_inc_end" SUBSYSTEM=="block", ACTION=="add", ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="isw_raid_member", \ RUN+="/sbin/mdadm -I $env{DEVNAME}" LABEL="md_imsm_inc_end" SUBSYSTEM=="block", ACTION=="remove", ENV{ID_PATH}=="?*", \ RUN+="/sbin/mdadm -If $name --path $env{ID_PATH}" SUBSYSTEM=="block", ACTION=="remove", ENV{ID_PATH}!="?*", \ RUN+="/sbin/mdadm -If $name" # Next make sure that this isn't a dm device we should skip for some reason ENV{DM_UDEV_RULES_VSN}!="?*", GOTO="dm_change_end" ENV{DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG}=="1", GOTO="dm_change_end" ENV{DM_SUSPENDED}=="1", GOTO="dm_change_end" KERNEL=="dm-*", SUBSYSTEM=="block", ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="linux_raid_member", \ ACTION=="change", RUN+="/sbin/mdadm -I $env{DEVNAME}" LABEL="dm_change_end" # Finally catch any nested md raid arrays. If we brought up an md raid # array that's part of another md raid array, it won't be ready to be used # until the change event that occurs when it becomes live KERNEL=="md*", SUBSYSTEM=="block", ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="linux_raid_member", \ ACTION=="change", RUN+="/sbin/mdadm -I $env{DEVNAME}" # Added line # Pass-through of all /dev/md* arrays. # Will end up as Removable Storage that can be assigned to a VM. KERNEL=="md*", SUBSYSTEM=="block", ACTION=="change", SYMLINK+="xapi/block/%k", \ RUN+="/bin/sh -c '/opt/xensource/libexec/local-device-change %k 2>&1 >/dev/null&'" LABEL="md_end"
    • P

      Problems Upgrading XenOrchestra

      IT Discussion
      • xen xenorchestra xenserver xcp • • papaf
      26
      1
      Votes
      26
      Posts
      3.2k
      Views

      P

      @black3dynamite I used the old one, and it worked. I succesfully installed xo now. Normally, I'd like to know what went wrong, but it's too late and friday 🙂

    • BRRABillB

      XenServer Not Booting

      IT Discussion
      • xenserver • • BRRABill
      10
      1
      Votes
      10
      Posts
      1.3k
      Views

      DustinB3403D

      @brrabill said in XenServer Not Booting:

      @dustinb3403 said in XenServer Not Booting:

      The culprit is likely that you'd didn't point your logs to a different directory, and those logs being written destroyed the USB.

      No logs written to USB.

      We spent forever going over all that, remember?

      I don't remember, but in any case XS reading/writing to the USB killed your boot device

    • K

      Adding additional Drive to XenServer host, get error

      IT Discussion
      • raid perc h200 xenserver xen virtualization storage lvm linux • • krisleslie
      27
      1
      Votes
      27
      Posts
      3.9k
      Views

      black3dynamiteB

      @krisleslie said in Adding additional Drive to XenServer host, get error:

      @black3dynamite i use 1 hdd 😞

      I meant virtual disks. VM1 with virtual disk 1 = OS and virtual disk 2 = data

    • geek-babaG

      XOSAN with XO Community edition

      IT Discussion
      • xosan xenorchestra xenserver xcp-ng xcp xen virtualization rls vsan storage • • geek-baba
      29
      2
      Votes
      29
      Posts
      9.0k
      Views

      olivierO

      Also we could achieve hyperconvergence "the other way" (unlike having a global shared filesystem like Gluster or Ceph) but use fine grained replication (per VM/VM disk). That's really interesting (data locality, tiering, thin pro etc.). Obviously, we'll collaborate to see how to integrate this in our stack 🙂

    • DustinB3403D

      Xen Orchestra - Monorepo installation Changes

      IT Discussion
      • xo xenserver xen orchestra community • • DustinB3403
      32
      3
      Votes
      32
      Posts
      3.7k
      Views

      DustinB3403D

      @danp his installation is pre-service creation.

      IMO time to rebuild and get current.

    • mlnewsM

      Home Network Setup

      IT Discussion
      • xp dhcp dns home lab xenserver kvm ubiquiti virtualization sophos linux untangle • • mlnews
      88
      2
      Votes
      88
      Posts
      10.1k
      Views

      jmooreJ

      @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

      @jmoore said in Home Network Setup:

      @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

      @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

      The whole crux of my ask was - the desire to buy as few Windows Server CALs as possible.

      This is unrelated to the question asked, though.

      you know i have noticed you and dash really communicate differently. not good or bad, just different. then you both have trouble understanding the other. from the many threads i have read with you two, that is the common theme i have seen.

      I'd assume part of it is that I am highly literal. That tends to be a root of many communications issues for me in general.

      yeah i think your right you are literal. i had to adjust my communication with you. that was my fault though, i am used to having to be so unliteral with my users because i would lose them that i got into that bad habit lol. i know for me, i was not explaining my thoughts in a well laid out way and that made me harder to understand and threw you off. did i do better that time?

    • mlnewsM

      Need to Improve Disk Utilization on XenServer 7.2

      IT Discussion
      • xp xenserver xenserver 7.2 storage iops • • mlnews
      98
      0
      Votes
      98
      Posts
      10.7k
      Views

      K

      So when I first install XenServer and I "tick" thin provisioning, behind the scene it's making the drive ext, so I assume if I didn't choose thin provisioning it would have made it LVM?

    • DustinB3403D

      The argument for official support vs third party support

      IT Discussion
      • vmware xenserver support msp • • DustinB3403
      34
      3
      Votes
      34
      Posts
      4.1k
      Views

      scottalanmillerS

      @storageninja said in The argument for official support vs third party support:

      @dashrender said in The argument for official support vs third party support:

      Same problem for the vendors. If you are dealing with unpatched spares, so are they. Having worked for some of the big ones, I know that their supply chains struggle to get parts, too. Heck, IBM couldn't deliver a server internally in more than six months, imagine how hard it is to get support parts!

      Shit like this just blows my mind.

      Parts Bins, internal supplies for labs, and customer supply chains are all completely different (well IBM may have been a gong show). Dell and HPE staff can't just go grab something off the line, with Mfg you have to account for the costs and someone gets to pay (and often at a premium to prevent abuse) for those internal servers.

      Parts Bins and stocking those are different, and supply chain for a OEM might actually be different in the us than EMEA.

      At IBM< we were an external customer, even though we were inside IBM. We showed up just like any external enterprise customer. So their inability to support was universal.

    • DustinB3403D

      Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?

      IT Discussion
      • virtualization hyper-v management ssd raid5 kvm xenserver esxi autocad smb education • • DustinB3403
      89
      1
      Votes
      89
      Posts
      11.7k
      Views

      scottalanmillerS

      @luismc said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

      @dashrender said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

      As for Sharepoint - You don't get that much storage in Sharepoint in O365, so you'll likely be paying for more storage there. Sharepoint also has a number of files per site limit, just something else to watch out for.

      For future reference to anyone wondering, I spoke to three different O365 reps today and they said the limit has been bumped to 1 million items so we'll be good for a while!

      That's a bit more!

    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
    • 1 / 8