This would work on prem exchange. Probably works with a tweak for o365. Get-mailbox | get-inboxrule | remove-inboxrule

@aaronstuder : After several minute delays between their replies, they'll eventually give you a phone number to call instead...

@scottalanmiller Perhaps they did at one time, but selected the option to not show it again.

I have seen this before and it is usually with IE or Edge and can login on Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. I also try to clear all the user sessions via powershell.

A bit outside your specific question; however on my Exchange servers I just disabled the MSExchange ActiveDirectory Topology Service; doing that prevented the rest of the Exchange services from loading and KB40720650 loaded without issue

I wouldn't like to see the end of 365, but I would always like to see good competition to Microsoft, a leopard never changes its spots in my eyes and Microsoft have history with all the previous court cases in some of their dodgy practices and monopolisation..they slagged off Linux to high heaven in the older days and now their embracing it? Might be something to do with Microsoft using it as part of their azure backend. You can't doubt they make some excellent products but they have always ripped people off and most of their licencing models are complete shit...I think in a few years people will be moaning to high hell once all their subscription models have been increased through the roof and Microsoft know you won't go over to Google now as their Google apps/g suite has been left in the dust. Microsoft are far from a perfect company and it does iritate me when people di*k ride and never see any fault with them and a lot and most are Linux haters I find as well...

These are the kind of things you think someone would catch. Not like it's some random 3rd party app on some 3rd party OS on some 3rd party host.

Outlook for the win.. Thanks

@scottalanmiller said in List All Public Folders in Exchange or Office 365 with PowerShell: Want to get a list of all of the public folders on your Exchange system, whether on premises or hosted, try this: Get-PublicFolder -Identity "\" -Recurse | Get-PublicFolderClientPermission | where{$_.Accessrights -eq "owner"} More on Get-PublicFolder from TechNet That's pretty cool. I was wondering why you were piping into every owner since you could create public folders in Exchange without delegating owners, but then I had remembered you can create them on the client side as well after a root or folders are created in Exchange and added to the client, which is explained in your first pipe. Thanks for the note.

@momurda FYI I would have selected your post as the answer, but the NodeBB plugin doesn't let you do that.

As the others have asked.... Outlook can use anything. It is often associated with Exchange, but there is no specific connection. Zimbra, GoDaddy, anything could be the email that Outlook is showing you. And your question is about the email server, not Outlook. So knowing that someone has connected with Outlook doesn't give us any starting point.

Just setup Veeam Backup for Office 365 and going to give it a test to try and avoid this scenario.

At least you found a (somewhat) viable workaround.

Everything detailed it here: https://products.office.com/en-us/exchange/microsoft-exchange-server-licensing-licensing-overview

@momurda said in O365 Email search for Attorney -: @scottalanmiller Yes, and the not being able to use Discovery service, and teh not being able to add a pst to Outlook part. Those aren't things I'd expect a lawyer to be doing, though. That's tech work for technical people, not legal work.

@dustinb3403 said in Exchange migrations, scenarios to hope you're never in.: User abuse is the only bug we can't fix with technology. Good to know eseutil was able to correct the issue. Even that was just very weird. The status had stopped updating and processes associated with it quit doing anything for around 20 minutes. We were both wondering what was going on when I was like "I'm going to ctrl+c it." So the cancel current command actually kicked off a whole bunch of activity that went quite quickly compared to what it had been running at before and actually repaired the DB. We were both more than a little confused over that one.

@NerdyDad thanks, I read the article before and then forgot... thanks.

Split DNS is the way to go if you have the .local domain naming. Otherwise having your organization domain as org.domain.com might be better as to not use your main domain.

@Mike-Davis said in Exchange 2010 Synchronization Service Manager - Automating this with PowerShell: When you fire that power shell script off, if you go back to the sync manager, you'll see it does all 6 things. Yep, that's how I confirmed it!

@stacksofplates I am pretty happy with it over all.

OK, finally got that solved using this, and guess what the results are.... Failed the test. Yay..... now lets see what Microsoft has to say about the results...

Is this purely a failed certificate issue? I mean that would make sense, but I've not done a lot with Exchange (and O365) besides dick-around with the settings as this organization has some major config issues.

@maalmeida said in I cannot get any invitation from Spiceworks: @Romo Exactamente. Con el dns no me dejaba entrar y ahora con la ip si pero me muestra eso Si te muestra eso por que la configuracion por default en servidores del explorer es muy restrictiva, lo cual es normal y recomendable puesto que realmente no se debe navegar desde los servidores. Lo importante es que con la ip si te intenta cargar el acceso a OWA, si trataras con el puro nombre del servidor tambien te deberia de mostrar lo mismo que con la ip.

If that doesn't work, you might also need to do: Set-MailboxFolderPermission -Identity "conf-room:\non_ipm_subtree\freebusy data" -User default -AccessRights reviewer

This picture doesn't really say much, and now that they've fixed their inbound TLS issue, perhaps the unencrypted number will be a lot smaller from now on... just thought I'd share what they shared.

I shared this with my parent company and they did an evaluation, but found that its not really useful for them. Initial feedback was " the application supports files only - no other objects (list items, etc.)" Anyone checked this already and is this the case?

@Dashrender said LOL he said made in America. Yes he did