I've not seen this, either.

That's a bunch of lol...what?

SFTP is definitely just fine. Keep it simple 🙂

@wls-itguy said in Windows laptops stuck at 1709.192 update.:

What in the #&#

Great! BTW, I read a while ago that WSUS was going away? Yet today in my searches for this issue I see that it is indeed still alive and well on 2012 servers? Did I dream that WSUS was going away?

It often should go away, but I don't know that MS is taking it away.

Yes, that requires moving to Standard licensing, and yes, it will be quite costly.

Can you show us the ping output?

@thwr said in Question about switch configuration in relation to server NIC teaming:

Switch independent works pretty good. Also take a look into SET (Switch Embedded Teaming), which moves teaming one layer up. It's basically the next logical step.

Meh, my bad. SET requires Windows Server 2016

bkuwPrC.png

@mike-davis said in SharePoint Online as a File Server:

@dbeato said in SharePoint Online as a File Server:

More information on Quickbooks and Linux below (Not that I would encourage it)
https://community.intuit.com/articles/1552445-install-linux-database-server-manager

I'm right there with you. QuickBooks has problems enough of its own without involving two operating systems.

Two? Looks like the database only goes on one. No additional complexity. But solves some major licensing costs. Windows Server + CALs just for QB is pretty expensive.

@flaxking said in Staggering Cost of Azure and Windows on Cloud:

I've heard that GitLab uses Azure in order to test their resiliency

They do, it's caused a bit of outages there.

@travisdh1 said in Even former Intel president believes future is ARM:

@scottalanmiller said in Even former Intel president believes future is ARM:

Sounds exciting, but loads of companies have said this, and then dropped their plans before releasing 😞

Yeah, waiting on the ARM CPU revolution is seeming more like expecting the year of the alternate desktops 🙁

Yeah, we've been waiting on this since RiscOS was hot.

When it comes to Zoho Creator, like many apps you may see around the interwebs, most companies have moved to a layout which is a 2 or 3-panel layout which is a big plus for me. I use Quickbase and the design layout kinda is lacking, however, with their new CEO came a newfound investment in ironing out some layout issues and simple api issues.

My biggest reason for loving Zoho creator would be how it integrates with what I consider to be a life blood for some smaller companies which is basically Zoho Social and Zoho Connect. That helps enable communication to your clients/customers (Social) and inter-communication (Connect). In comparison, it is what Facebook for Workplace is going to become in the future.

Zoho has actual phone apps (big plus) while Quickbase doesnt (just a web app with a style sheet change). I love Podio in that it is built up from the ground up to be mobile app and web friendly and quick to extend it's functionality.

I would assume the key features your looking at are:
-custom reporting
-easy of development
-cost sensitivity
-what you consider as mail merge

I re-read your OP and I want to say if you're just trying to make a tabular/spreadsheet report out the box Zoho does that just as much as anyone else in low-code dev.

Sounds like you may be trying to wing it and just push through, but I would suggest watching the webinars (which they have tons on their site and youtube). Also 3rd party people like myself make youtube videos as well detailing the design/development process. It is there just one quick google 🙂

Also I don't mind helping wherever I can!!!

@black3dynamite It's there, but I'm still getting the above error

@dbeato said in Can't figure out the cause of LAN broadcast traffic spilling over into WLAN zone on SonicWall:

@dave247 said in Can't figure out the cause of LAN broadcast traffic spilling over into WLAN zone on SonicWall:

Problem solved. Turns out I had to manually remove VLAN 1 access from the configured ports. Apparently this must be done for all general mode ports on Dell N series switches.

Yes, because that is the default PVID of the ports.

Yes but I had changed the PDIV of the port from the default value to 300. So, I thought that VLAN 1 access would stop and only VLAN 300 would be allowed.

@black3dynamite said in Nextcloud 12/CentOS 7 -- Problem with code integrity check:

@emad-r said in Nextcloud 12/CentOS 7 -- Problem with code integrity check:

@black3dynamite
I ll try my best to answer:

You can have either but not both, PHP as Apache HTTPD module or PHP as FPM, If you want to setup PHP-FPM on centos instead of PHP module or mod_php, and then PHP-FPM starts as an systemctl service, you will need to carry on those steps:

Install Apache:

yum -y install httpd systemctl enable httpd systemctl start httpd

Install PHP-FPM:

yum -y install php yum -y install php-fpm

Configure Apache httpd:

nano /etc/httpd/conf.d/php.conf <FilesMatch \.php$> # SetHandler application/x-httpd-php SetHandler "proxy:fcgi://127.0.0.1:9000" </FilesMatch>

Then:

systemctl start php-fpm systemctl enable php-fpm systemctl restart httpd

For me if I want to make any web app, I just simply go this route, back in the day I would make it faster by running Nginx, but most third party web apps expect apache, and I found out the by simply using PHP-FPM with Apache I can make the web app as responsive and fast as ever, and I never found scenario where that is not compatible, what you simply do is remove PHP being child of apache, and giving it daemon of its own with children, and it becomes very fast.

The setup on CentOS is different compare to Fedora 27.

Installing php also installs php-fpm.

[root@localhost hjohnson]# dnf install php Last metadata expiration check: 2:30:05 ago on Wed 07 Feb 2018 08:46:00 AM MST. Dependencies resolved. ============================================================================================================================================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================================================================================================================================================ Installing: php x86_64 7.1.14-1.fc27 updates 2.8 M Installing dependencies: nginx-filesystem noarch 1:1.12.1-1.fc27 fedora 20 k php-cli x86_64 7.1.14-1.fc27 updates 4.2 M php-common x86_64 7.1.14-1.fc27 updates 1.0 M php-json x86_64 7.1.14-1.fc27 updates 72 k Installing weak dependencies: php-fpm x86_64 7.1.14-1.fc27 updates 1.5 M

And its already configured /etc/httpd/conf.d/php.conf

# Redirect to local php-fpm if mod_php is not available <IfModule !mod_php5.c> <IfModule !mod_php7.c> # Enable http authorization headers SetEnvIfNoCase ^Authorization$ "(.+)" HTTP_AUTHORIZATION=$1 <FilesMatch \.(php|phar)$> SetHandler "proxy:unix:/run/php-fpm/www.sock|fcgi://localhost" </FilesMatch> </IfModule> </IfModule>

Yup I noticed this with Fedora, and when I jump to Fedora , or when Centos gets updated to reach Fedora levels like in 3-5 years I will worry about that. I never reached scenario where I needed bleeding edge server, and if that is the case usually it is Ubuntu and not Fedora.

@jaredbusch said in Fedora 27 Filesystem root full:

damned desktop system has something forcing this...
0_1518020396504_462cbbad-fb25-40e7-bd9d-96ecb407c51b-image.png

Oh yeah, if you have a GUI, it uses your /home space.

@nerdydad said in Need a host recommendation:

@scottalanmiller said in Need a host recommendation:

@mike-davis said in Need a host recommendation:

@scottalanmiller said in Need a host recommendation:

In theory, as an IPOD, it might need zero.

in the very first post he said:
10k disk for VM OS
15k or SSD for SQL drives (RAID1 is an option, but RAID10 would be preferred). I'm sure RAID5 under SSD would possibly be acceptable.

So that made me think local storage.

Maybe I misunderstood, I thought that that was on the SAN.

Nope. On the hosts. Local Storage. There is some DAS equipment currently connected but that is more for archiving and backups. That's it.

Oh, ok. I'm so confused then, lol.

@mike-davis said in 802.1x wired security best practice:

For those that are running 802.1x device authentication for wired windows devices, do you have a port that bypasses authentication so that you can join your workstations to the domain and get the group policy to push the cert down?

Then just have a jack on your bench where you build new machines that lets you join it to the domain and get the cert before you put the machine out on the floor?

For devices like copiers, is there anything you can do besides MAC filtering that puts them in a copier VLAN?

Newer Copier do support 802.1x, see below for Xerox
0_1518009022039_2018-02-07_0809.png
Otherwise MAC Filtering is the way to go.

For the port, if we have MDT and WDS we have the ports without any authentication and then they are joined to the domain.

We use 8.8 on CentOS 7, no problems.

@emad-r said in Nextcloud 13 Brings Improved UI, Video and Text Chat, End-to-end Encryption, Improved performance and more:

is the extra addons/features reliable = no

You can say that about any system that allows add ons. Just don't use them if they are a problem. Treat them as other pieces of software and evaluate them individually.

If you think of Windows or Linux as the base and say that not all of the third party software available for them are reliable, you'd not be able to use operating systems in general.