@bnrstnr said in Webex vs. Microsoft Teams + FreePBX conference:

One thing I didn't like about teams is that you have to install a client to attend the meeting, which is the same for Webex and just about every other major solution if I remember correctly.

I just attended a Teams meeting today and it didn't require I install anything. Joined via web browser.

@Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

@Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

@Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

@mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

Slack isn’t worried about Microsoft’s big Teams push

Slack’s CEO compares Microsoft’s Teams bundling to Google+
Microsoft revealed last week that it now has more than 13 million people using its Microsoft Teams chat software, a milestone that means the app has overtaken Slack.

It's hard not to agree. Actual engagement is the only thing that matters.

Actually, it's businesses being willing to pay for the service is all that matters.

It’s not something you pay extra for since it’s bundled with O365.

You are.

If you want Slack, it's not because you also want Google Sheets or Zimbra email with XYZ. It's because you want Slack because of what business needs it covers.
Slack is $6-$12 per user per month.

If you just want MS Teams (which is a legit need by the way), too bad, you also have to pay for other stuff you may or may not need or use.
MS Teams will cost you $5, which is cheaper than Slack, which does NOT include Office or Office Suite, but does include Exchange... whether or not you need it. To get Office, it's a minimum of $12.50 for Business Premium (< 300 users). Otherwise, you're buying enterprise O365 licenses which just goes up.

If you're an organization who is already utilizing Office 365 in any fashion, it makes sense to thoroughly vet Teams before its alternatives since it's bundled in. That's the part that will hurt Slack the most is organizations who "force" themselves into using Teams since it's already included in their O365 subscription rather than looking at paying additional for Slack.

@wirestyle22 said in How to authenticate via AD to non-domain server:

@zachary715 Def report back. I'm curious.

Just finished fresh 16.04 install. Installed bookstack via their install script. Added server to AD via http://ricktbaker.com/2017/11/08/ubuntu-16-with-active-directory-connectivity/. Same results. I'm missing something.

@wirestyle22 said in How to authenticate via AD to non-domain server:

@zachary715 that may not be a graceful upgrade. I haven't compared. I know a lot changed with 18.04. I'd be willing to do it but it's dependent on whether or not my vxrail servers explode again or not. Nothing like multiple millions of dollars worth of hardware having issues to keep you up at night

Haha no worries then. I'm going to install it on 16.04 and see if it works. If it does, then I'll upgrade to 18.04 and see what happens.

Yeah I've gone back to Ubuntu's documentation and even added some of the things for AD join that the other tutorial didn't mention, and still no luck. What a pain. I may spin up a 16.04 server and see if I can get that to work.

@wirestyle22 If you have time and can make a clone of your bookstack install and upgrade it to 18.04 and test, that might be helpful as well.

@wirestyle22 said in How to authenticate via AD to non-domain server:

@zachary715 Try using your hostname without the port specified for LDAP_SERVER=

Same results...

@wirestyle22 said in How to authenticate via AD to non-domain server:

@zachary715 post your .env file

I followed the thread you and @dbeato were discussing setting it up, so I'm assuming you have it running and authenticating. If you specify machines in AD via Log On To, can you still have them log in?

# Database details
DB_HOST=localhost
DB_DATABASE=bookstack
DB_USERNAME=bookstack
DB_PASSWORD=PASSWORD

# Mail system to use
# Can be 'smtp', 'mail' or 'sendmail'
MAIL_DRIVER=smtp

# SMTP mail options
MAIL_HOST=localhost
MAIL_PORT=1025
MAIL_USERNAME=null
MAIL_PASSWORD=null
MAIL_ENCRYPTION=null

# General auth
AUTH_METHOD=ldap

# The LDAP host, Adding a port is optional
LDAP_SERVER=10.10.168.10:389

# If using LDAP over SSL you should also define the protocol:
# LDAP_SERVER=ldaps://example.com:636

# The base DN from where users will be searched within
LDAP_BASE_DN=dc=domain,dc=local

# The full DN and password of the user used to search the server
# Can both be left as false to bind anonymously
[email protected]
LDAP_PASS=Password

# A filter to use when searching for users
# The user-provided user-name used to replace any occurrences of '${user}'
LDAP_USER_FILTER=(&(sAMAccountName=${user}))

# Set the LDAP version to use when connecting to the server
LDAP_VERSION=3

# Set the default 'email' attribute. Defaults to 'mail'
LDAP_EMAIL_ATTRIBUTE=mail

# Set the property to use for a user's display name. Defaults to 'cn'
LDAP_DISPLAY_NAME_ATTRIBUTE=cn

Just joined to domain and still having same issue. I even limited my own account to just bookstack and it wouldn't let me log in. Error says "These credentials do not match our records". As soon as I remove Log On To restrictions, these accounts can sign in.

Verified domain join by running id DOMAIN\\user and ensured I was getting user properties back.

Followed these steps to join to domain... https://www.server-world.info/en/note?os=Ubuntu_18.04&p=realmd

Server gets IP from DHCP, there's a new computer entry in AD further verifying it successfully joined domain, and I also verified the DNS entry for the server. Not having passed AD authentication before for a scenario like this, not sure if this is typical or some issue with bookstack authentication specifically.

@notverypunny said in How to authenticate via AD to non-domain server:

Can you use RADIUS? Was able to get our firewalls to authenticate VPN users against Microsoft's RADIUS implementation and validate against specific security groups in AD.

Don't currently have RADIUS setup, so this seems to be the long way around the issue. Thanks for the suggestion.