UPDATE: Everything looks like it's back online. Upgrade succeeded.

For anyone who is trying to upgrade to latest stable version, the Nextcloud download site is currently unavailable.

@jospoortvliet

@DustinB3403 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

It's still a trick, that price isn't per diaper its for a box of 100.

Other way to look at it...

12 condoms = 2 weeks to 1 month worth of product (ymmv)
100 diapers = you're set for 3-5 days based on how much your baby goes through them

@RojoLoco LMAO! Genius marketing and shelf product placement.

Have you tried this? Disable the SIP module could fix your problem.

https://community.sophos.com/kb/en-us/123523

@scottalanmiller said in Why I See UTMs As Generally Bad in the Current Market:

I believe both Sophos and Palo Alto offer their UTM products in software at a pretty major price discount from their appliance offerings. But as they are both closed pricing, there is no official pricing on either approach.

I can't speak for PA but Sophos licensing in a VM is based on IP addresses while the hardware isn't limited to that license scheme. Guess it's their way of forcing people to the hardware.

Nicely written post. I appreciate that you took the time to put your thoughts down.

I'm one of those who has a UTM (Sophos XG) on my lab network. I could replace it with a firewall I suppose but I also like to tinker and learn it so it keeps me occupied (maybe I spend more time on it then I should when I screw something up lol). To be honest, none of my clients have a UTM. I've never felt like they needed one. And while I DO have a UTM, I can also confirm that it HAS stopped bad things from happening. Is it because it was the first thing on the network edge to catch the bad thing? Yep, probably. Would my son's AV have caught it? I'll never really know. But like I said, I keep it because I like to tinker.

One thing that I've read over and over and over is that UTM's are generally NOT recommended. However, I'm interested in what use-cases people believe they may be a good fit. I often see "if you're going to use a UTM, get a Palo Alto" but would love to hear about when people think it IS a good fit.

Something else I want to ask. When I see "if you're going to use a UTM, get a Palo Alto", would love to know about WHY Palo Alto. I don't have any experience with them so I'd love to hear about what makes them the go-to. What do they have that the other offers don't? What do they do that is so different to place them head and shoulders above the rest?

Has anyone looked at this yet?

https://nextcloud.com/blog/rocket.chat-and-nextcloud-announce-partnership-and-integration/

Things that bugged me about Mattermost...

• Limit on the number of characters in a channel name. Last I had it running, it was too short to be useful...like 20 characters only.
• Deleted channels did not also delete files so any files you had uploaded would permanently remain on the server. I think that's still the case. Have not tested whether that also exists with RocketChat.

@jaredbusch said in Disable FreePBX Admin Access Via Port 80:

@nashbrydges said in Disable FreePBX Admin Access Via Port 80:

@jaredbusch said in Disable FreePBX Admin Access Via Port 80:

@nashbrydges said in Disable FreePBX Admin Access Via Port 80:

@jaredbusch Brilliant! I changed the HTTP service to reject and it automatically redirects to HTTPS. Didn't even think of this.

No idea how LE works, but you'll find out in 60 days.

True enough. I'll leave this enabled and update if it caused any issues with LE.

Disabled you mean?

Lol, yes.

@jaredbusch said in Disable FreePBX Admin Access Via Port 80:

@nashbrydges said in Disable FreePBX Admin Access Via Port 80:

@jaredbusch Brilliant! I changed the HTTP service to reject and it automatically redirects to HTTPS. Didn't even think of this.

No idea how LE works, but you'll find out in 60 days.

True enough. I'll leave this enabled and update if it caused any issues with LE.