Hi folks,
I have a Dell switch with VLAN4. Under IP on the UI, this VLAN4 has no IP addressing set. Interface 2 - 10 is set to be access mode, PVID 4.
A second Dell switch also has VLAN4, which is set to be 172.16.x.x network. The interfaces are set access mode 1 - 48 PVID 4. Interface 1 connects to an ASA 172.16.0.1.
If I connect the first switch interface 2 to the second switch, should they act as one VLAN? (Like, if I connected two layer 2 switch).
Best,
Jim
@dafyre said in Site to site VPN with vLANs:
@Jimmy9008 said in Site to site VPN with vLANs:
Hi folks,
I have a few switch stacks here. vLAN1/default is set to have a gateway of 172.16.0.1, which is an ASA. The box has some site-to-site VPNs setup.
From the default LAN/vLAN1, I can ping/communicate with devices on the other end of the VPN.
Interface 5 of the ASA is vLAN10, this is 10.4.0.1. Any device on that network is unable to communicate over the VPN, but the ASA is set to allow this traffic from 10.4.x.x as far as I can see...
Could it be a vLAN issue? If vLAN10 traffic is going over the VPN, does the other end need to also be set for vLAN10 to allow that on the remote LAN? Or, as its routed, would the vLAN information in the traffic be irreverent from the 10.4.0.1 gateway out?
Best,
JimDoes the other side of the VPN know how to get back to 10.4.0.0?
I'll have a look. So, the other end is 10.2.0.1, do I need to add a route in that ASA to say 10.4.x.x -> route out 10.2.x.x?
Hi folks,
I have a few switch stacks here. vLAN1/default is set to have a gateway of 172.16.0.1, which is an ASA. The box has some site-to-site VPNs setup.
From the default LAN/vLAN1, I can ping/communicate with devices on the other end of the VPN.
Interface 5 of the ASA is vLAN10, this is 10.4.0.1. Any device on that network is unable to communicate over the VPN, but the ASA is set to allow this traffic from 10.4.x.x as far as I can see...
Could it be a vLAN issue? If vLAN10 traffic is going over the VPN, does the other end need to also be set for vLAN10 to allow that on the remote LAN? Or, as its routed, would the vLAN information in the traffic be irreverent from the 10.4.0.1 gateway out?
Best,
Jim
@scottalanmiller said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
In terms of VMs, from memory (im at home) the blades run around 380 VMs. The storage side (aka 170TB number) comes from another team, so I have to just go based on that.
So... could be anything. No retention or recovery details? RTO? RPO?
Retention: 20 days, daily incremental. RTO, RPO - nope.
@scottalanmiller said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
So, I just need something for 15k or less that will get me to 2020.
Downside... there is no answer we can give (or you can give) that will tell you if this is the case.
Upside... you are given no goals or requirements. So ANYTHING you give is an answer.
In terms of VMs, from memory (im at home) the blades run around 380 VMs. The storage side (aka 170TB number) comes from another team, so I have to just go based on that.
@scottalanmiller said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
I hope that they pay really well, because they are mocking you with the money to just throw away for no reason.
Lol, its ok.
Remember, this is the place where everything is running on blades too! Lol, and not backed up at all.
So, I just need something for 15k or less that will get me to 2020.
From previous use I know that the Veeam Agent Free edition can be installed on a VM, pointed to a NAS/SMB share with credentials over a network, set to email upon failure, success or error, and set with a schedule. Expensive, sure. But it gets me backed up until 2020.
@scottalanmiller said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
How are you determining the amount of storage that will be needed?
No idea, out of my remit here.
@scottalanmiller said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
How are you determining the amount of storage that will be needed?
I've been given the target by another team, so that is out of my hands. The rest of the company use B&R, but they do not plan on introducing this to UK side until 2019 (sometime in 2020). So we have been told to use up to 15k to get ourselves backed up until then using the Veeam Agent Free Edition, then in 2020 we will be incorporated. Out of my hands, but is what it is.
Makes sense with what you say about the backup server and the storage behind that server/attached to the backup server. But thats not where we are here until 2020.
@scottalanmiller said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
This makes sense. I cannot currently use this product though if it only allows two VMs.
Sounds like Veeam isn't a viable option for you, it doesn't allow for your budgetary needs.
Currently. We will be using Veeam next year. But this year we have to use up to the 15k to get backups in place until then, and the Free Agent/Windows edition works well from where I have seen it used before.