@adam-ierymenko said in Zerotier failing to start after upgrade:
Do an update. We released new binary builds for Linux that should address this.
Sorry for resurrecting an old thread, but new installs are having the same selinux issue. Took some digging for me to figure out what was going on. Multiple attempts to install on Fedora 33.
@JaredBusch I have a single ZeroTier on Windows that I just realized hasn't been updated since I first installed it. I'll get it updated and see how it acts.
@DustinB3403 said in Trying to get metrics comparing two APs Cisco and Ubiquiti:
@travisdh1 said in Trying to get metrics comparing two APs Cisco and Ubiquiti:
Have you ever done a proper site survey? I think that's where you need to start.
For this client no, they aren't huge by any means. They've got a hodgepodge of equipment today, but are sitting on a bunch of dated meraki AP's backed with a mixture of different switches.
The usage for the warehouse is to support handheld computer type scanners for inventory control, no tablets/cell phones etc.
The office space isn't overly large, maybe 100 of so office staff (at the most).
That is going to be a large office area, 100 people take up a lot of space, unless a bunch of them are hot desking.
@DustinB3403 said in Trying to get metrics comparing two APs Cisco and Ubiquiti:
@travisdh1 So the question isn't do I really need those speeds, I'm trying to find comparable models for each use case. Which the use case for this one cisco model is supposed to be in a warehouse.
- Coverage area, lots of metal structures to deal with
- Two APs max
- limited user totals - not high density
I don't think the speed is the factor, more the range of coverage in that sort of area.
Have you ever done a proper site survey? I think that's where you need to start.
Well, you could start by at least picking something within the same ballpark. The Cisco's start at a little under $1000 each, while the UniFi HD goes for $349 each, but I'd argue that a UniFi nanoHD ($179) or UniFi Pro ($149) would be better with their higher max speed.
Yes, the Cisco can probably handle more clients per access point, and is faster according to the spec sheet. But do you NEED 2402Mbps when you can get 1750Mbps for a fraction of the price?
Finally, I think you're multiplying instead of dividing with your math there. WiFi bandwidth is shared among all clients. Which brings up another point against spending that extra money on the Cisco, in reality it won't be any faster than the Ubiquiti because they will both be limited to the slowest client that connects to them.
@siringo said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
well that's lunch over and done with.
I know that I'm up past my bedtime, because @siringo finished lunch.
Worked till 10 last night, so late start today. Setting up an ASUS VivoBook Flip 14 I picked up for the parents. Impressive machine for the price, and CPU isn't nearly so bad as the 1.1GHz clock speed would indicate. First real use will be for my grandfather to join the rest of the family on a Jitsi meeting over Thanksgiving 
@travisdh1 said in ZOOM alternative:
@EddieJennings said in ZOOM alternative:
Perhaps https://meet.jit.si
Or our own thread on public Jitsi servers: https://mangolassi.it/topic/21573/sangoma-opened-a-jitsi-meet-server-also/5
https://meet.jit.si
https://meet.vitalpbx.org
https://meet.sangoma.com
@gjacobse said in ZOOM alternative:
Knew it had to have been discussed,
And likely that there wasn’t a free option.
Huh? What do you mean not free? All 3 of those I listed are free. The 2nd two are already ready to go, all you have to do is go to the site, that's it!
@EddieJennings said in ZOOM alternative:
Perhaps https://meet.jit.si
Or our own thread on public Jitsi servers: https://mangolassi.it/topic/21573/sangoma-opened-a-jitsi-meet-server-also/5
https://meet.jit.si
https://meet.vitalpbx.org
https://meet.sangoma.com
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@travisdh1 said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@travisdh1 said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
FiOS renamed to Frontier FiberOptic
They brought their crappy name to the foreground? uh - what?
What name, Frontier? Best ISP I know of nationwide. Not that there aren't better, but I work with hundreds of companies across the US and literally not one can get any ISP as good as Frontier. Best support, best speeds, best stability. I'd move offices to get access to Frontier over any other carrier.
I've had the exact opposite experience with them. Cruddy DSL and support that's powerless to actually do anything. Litterally so bad that people move houses to get a different provider.
Their old DSL was terrible. Once they went to FiOS, best provider I've ever come across.
You mean once they purchased a large portion of Verizon FiOS. It's Frontier, I have no faith that they'll maintain it.
they already have for a really long time, way past the point of waiting to see. We already have the pudding.
It took over 10 years before their DSL degraded due to lack of maintenance, and they just recently bought up large swaths of Verizon's FiOS. I'd argue that we won't have any proof for years yet.