I actually do work on the system pretty regularly because we have a legacy app that is on Windows and this is how we access it for maintenance work and that's all through me. I don't access customer machines often, but I access our own pretty commonly. And my experience has mostly been "wow, I'm surprised how fast this is" considering it is a remote desktop to a very distant and very slow network.

Veeam's free monitor is decent.

The built-in stuff works great too. (perfmon)

For Windows I would use shareX but without knowing what operating system you're trying to do this on I mean pretty much any thing might work

@luismc said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

@dashrender said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

As for Sharepoint - You don't get that much storage in Sharepoint in O365, so you'll likely be paying for more storage there. Sharepoint also has a number of files per site limit, just something else to watch out for.

For future reference to anyone wondering, I spoke to three different O365 reps today and they said the limit has been bumped to 1 million items so we'll be good for a while!

That's a bit more!

@prcssupport said in Closing down, have some equipment for sale:

I have enjoyed the past 10months and not thinking about computers.

Sorry to hear about your decision. Although, from the above quote it does sound like it might be the right move. I have thought long about going back to construction but the market here isn't what it should be and I'd be taking a serious pay cut.

@ramblingbiped There are multiple sites you can use to do this.

Have this up and running for a new website, testing it out. Configuration is a, well, breeze. LOL

@mlnews

Thread resurrected !!!

I see, interesting . Regarding Ovirt + GLusterFs my update on this is that did learn glustering and it was easy to perform. I didnt apply it in production or VMs. I did use Ovirt a month ago and it was very slow web ui experience.

I should write a thread about my and Gluster.

@grey said in Powershell: I got something wrong.:

@jaredbusch said in Powershell: I got something wrong.:

@grey Specify PasswordLastSet after the -and also otherwise it has no idea what you are trying to -lt.

Get-ADUser -filter {PasswordNeverExpires -eq $false -and (PasswordLastSet -gt "8/16/2017" -and PasswordLastSet -lt "8/21/2017") -and enabled -eq $true} -Properties PasswordLastSet,Name,Description

You win at the Internet today. I should have caught that.

I did enough time in development. I know how it goes.

@dashrender said in The Inappropriate Bundling of Services SAMIT Video:

@scottalanmiller said in The Inappropriate Bundling of Services SAMIT Video:

"what they do" for the other it is "what they have to do and hope you do as little as possible." Keeping lots of cooks in their own

Let's use GoDaddy as an example, short of them not supporting a record type, what's the issue with GoDaddy DNS and registrar in one account - specifically?

That's a good one to look at specifically.

GoDaddy DNS is cumbersome to use and wastes time. This is a vendor issue, not a bundling one. GoDaddy DNS has a less than stellar uptime track record. This isn't a service they are known for, they don't really care as serious customers don't use it for this. Under normal operations, non-IT staff should never have access to DNS records and IT staff should never have access to corporate identity records. Using GoDaddy for both removes the possibility of keeping those highly critical roles separate and puts the company in danger of IT running off with the company identity and business people of accidentally taking services offline. As above, there is no safe means of using contractor support for simple IT tasks. GoDaddy doesn't offer key DNS related features like caching. You are either stuck using a single registrar (often not even possible as different registrars offer different domains) or stuck managing DNS is multiple locations. It lowers flexibility. An outage from your registrar can take out your DNS with your risk mitigation removed as part of the outage. Otherwise a DNS outage can be protected against from the registrar and a registrar outage has no production impact. This is the biggest issue, it creates a whole form of risk that need not exist.

@jrc said in Help with some Cisco Questions:

But could it handle the traffic from over 3000 devices from 5 different sites?

Most likely. You'll have to see what your current switches are capable of.

@jaredbusch said in Disk2VHD/SQLServer:

@dashrender said in Disk2VHD/SQLServer:

It seems weird to me that the driver would have anything to do with it, but I do agree that the Network Profile is like different - i.e. The server thinks it's on a public network now instead of a domain or private network, so the firewall settings changed to match the new network profile.

Why would this be weird? Every time you change the network card you get new adapters. That is how windows has always worked.

What's weird is (was) that simply a new NIC would cause this issue. That's all I was saying. If the new NIC came up on the Domain Network Profile, you would assume all would stay the same. It's not weird that a new NIC would come up on a different Network Profile, i.e. prehaps it didn't detect the network link correctly - I've seen this many times.

thank you all.

@jrc said in Observium:

@hobbit666 said in Observium:

Looks very nice. Does Zabbix offer monitoring of servers to that level?

Huh? This thread is about Observium...

He was asking as a comparison.

If you have a mac you can use apple device configurator wmby which devoces can be pre cofigured and push apps. Catch is you need to use usb cable and configure phones one by one