Navigation

    ML
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    1. Home
    2. Tags
    3. replication
    Log in to post

    • SOLVED Promox and VM replication
      IT Discussion • replication proxmox proxmox ve proxmox 6.3 • • JaredBusch  

      21
      1
      Votes
      21
      Posts
      229
      Views

      I'll try and make a cleaner guide later.. First, spin up your ProxmoxVE system. During the install wizard, I left the boot drive as LVM but did change it to XFS instead of ext4. You do not setup secondary drives during the install wizard. Once up, you need to create the ZFS store on each system, named the same, prior to joining the cluster. The replication process wants the ZFS pool to be named the same on both systems and you cannot name it the same (at least in the GUI) if it already exists anywhere in the cluster. Then from the GUI, go to the disks of system 1. then click on ZFS and create the storage pool name it, single disk, compression off. wait for it to show normal. then repeat the process on the second system. make sure to use the same name. Now create the cluster and join the second system to the cluster. You will not see the storage on ZFS storage on system 2 when it first loads up. But it does exist if you look. To make it available, go to storage under datacenter. edit the existing "data" and add pve2 now it will show up and be available for use. Is this perfect? No. but it is how I was able to get it setup to work. The manual leave out quite a bit of specifics. on how to do things, but goes into detail on the technical of things.
    • Proxmox VE Setup
      IT Discussion • lvm zfs cluster replication proxmox proxmox ve proxmox 6.3 • • JaredBusch  

      17
      1
      Votes
      17
      Posts
      270
      Views

      @DustinB3403 I don't doubt it. There wasn't really any added complexity though. PVE was installed with all the defaults.
    • SOLVED Hyper-V Failover Clustering
      IT Discussion • hyper-v replication failover-clustering • • DustinB3403  

      7
      0
      Votes
      7
      Posts
      132
      Views

      You can have replication if you have Starwind Clustering on the hosts (That's how I have some customers). That said, even on those situations I have a DC on the Local Host Hyperv of one of the servers or have a Site to Site VPN with a DC on Azure or AWS as a failsafe.
    • StarWind Success Story: LightChange Finds Its Dream HA Provider
      Starwind • high availability san replication • • Oksana  

      1
      2
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      295
      Views

      No one has replied

    • Backing Up a NAS?! That’s Right!
      Starwind • starwind backup veeam nas replication • • Oksana  

      1
      2
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      86
      Views

      No one has replied

    • Use Hyper-V to replicate Linux vm file share
      IT Discussion • linux hyper-v fedora 28 nfs replication nfs file server • • FATeknollogee  

      49
      0
      Votes
      49
      Posts
      1028
      Views

      @phlipelder said in Use Hyper-V to replicate Linux vm file share: @scottalanmiller said in Use Hyper-V to replicate Linux vm file share: @phlipelder said in Use Hyper-V to replicate Linux vm file share: Hyper-V Replica would work in this situation with a few caveats. There is a 15 second limit on replication cycles. If the VMs are running database/active services this could be a problem. That would be handled earlier in the process by the backup job. If the backup is good, the replication won't cause an issue. If the backup is bad, the replication can't fix it, of course, but will replicate the bad backup. But the only place that this can be addressed is in the backup step, the replication is of backup files, so not at a point in the process where it matters. "Garbage in garbage out" never seems to go away. It's been the bane of our existence since the switch to image/block based backups. :S File backups suffered from this, too. Databases are just hard to back up.
    • A closer look at conventional DR site options for Windows Server 2016
      Starwind • hyper-v windows server veeam disaster recovery windows server 2016 replication ws2016 • • Oksana  

      1
      1
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      393
      Views

      No one has replied

    • Putting conventional DR site options for Windows Server 2016 on the table
      Starwind • storage microsoft hyper-v veeam disaster recovery windows server 2016 replication • • Oksana  

      1
      1
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      382
      Views

      No one has replied

    • Scale HyperCore HC3 Native Replication Feature Note
      Scale Legion • youtube scale scale hc3 replication hypercore • • scale  

      1
      3
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      417
      Views

      No one has replied

    • Get a true Hybrid Cloud solution for your existing Hyper-V infrastructure
      Starwind • starwind azure hyper-v vsan starwind vsan cluster replication virtual san ha starwind tap room starwind hybrid cloud workload 5nine ha cluster 5nine manager highly available cluster • • Oksana  

      1
      1
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      486
      Views

      No one has replied

    • KVM VM Replication
      IT Discussion • linux storage virtualization hyper-v kvm hypervisor replication drbd ceph gluster • • brianlittlejohn  

      31
      1
      Votes
      31
      Posts
      4344
      Views

      @JaredBusch said in KVM VM Replication: @scottalanmiller said in KVM VM Replication: Just using the search is best Tags. yeah, having tags on the topics makes them better than pinning.
    • GlusterFS + WebDAV Centos Setup Guide
      IT Discussion • centos replication webdav glusterfs winscp • • Emad R  

      1
      3
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      1116
      Views

      No one has replied

    • KVM Poor Man Replication HA
      IT Discussion • kvm replication ha cheap poor really • • Emad R  

      15
      1
      Votes
      15
      Posts
      2966
      Views

      @mlnews Thread resurrected !!! I see, interesting . Regarding Ovirt + GLusterFs my update on this is that did learn glustering and it was easy to perform. I didnt apply it in production or VMs. I did use Ovirt a month ago and it was very slow web ui experience. I should write a thread about my and Gluster.
    • Zertø Virtual Replication
      IT Discussion • replication zerto • • JaredBusch  

      44
      0
      Votes
      44
      Posts
      2405
      Views

      @JaredBusch I also didn't mind about zerto at the time because my resellers (asked a couple) offered really high prices - but don't remember the specific amount.
    • SW Port - New Server for virtual host - Sanity Check
      IT Discussion • dell esxi replication xbyte r720 • • DustinB3403  

      34
      0
      Votes
      34
      Posts
      2567
      Views

      @beta said in SW Port - New Server for virtual host - Sanity Check: Oh, one thing I was really curious about too, would it make sense to get an extra drive as a hot spare? Normally with OBR10 and spinning HDD, I'd put every spindle into the array, but since SSDs are going to give me plenty of IOPS and capacity, I didn't know if it is a good/bad idea with OBR5. The rule of "no hot spare ever" for RAID 5 still applies. If you were going to do this, you would do OBR 6. OBR6 can make loads of sense here, but OBR5 + HS does not. But it is up to you, depends on cost and risk aversion.
    • JRNL_WRAP_ERROR (SYSVOL)
      IT Discussion • windows server error replication domain controller sysvol • • wirestyle22  

      15
      1
      Votes
      15
      Posts
      2653
      Views

      @dbeato said in JRNL_WRAP_ERROR (SYSVOL): @wirestyle22 You can still do the following as well: http://kpytko.pl/active-directory-domain-services/authoritative-sysvol-restore-frs/ https://blogs.msmvps.com/acefekay/2013/08/28/how-to-recover-a-journal-wrap-error-jrnl_wrap_error-and-a-corrupted-sysvol-from-a-good-dc-what-option-do-i-use-d4-or-d2-whats-the-difference-between-d4-and-d2/ Maybe also move to DFRS instead of FRS, you would only use FRS if it is Server 2003 as part of one of your DCs Possibly in the future but I have so many other things to focus on
    • Build a highly fault-tolerant IT infrastructure with StarWind HyperConverged Appliance
      Starwind • starwind hyperconvergence hyperconverged cluster replication fault tolerance hca resiliency grid architecture nodes lrc • • Oksana  

      1
      6
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      606
      Views

      No one has replied

    • SOLVED DCs out of sync
      IT Discussion • active directory replication recovery • • thwr  

      14
      2
      Votes
      14
      Posts
      1702
      Views

      @thwr said in DCs out of sync: @Dashrender said in DCs out of sync: @thwr said in DCs out of sync: No substantial changes have been made during the last couple of weeks. Just a few new users and password changes plus maybe 2 or 3 new machine accounts. Some clients and servers now refuse to authenticate users during login due to the well known "trust could not be established between..." error. Where you still getting those errors after you powered down the broken DC? I'm guessing not since you moved forward with the install of another DC. Nope. Only "missing that other DC" errors now, which is fine. I've got some crappy internet connection (free WiFi in the train, next to no 3G/4G signal) here and can't check the current state. but it was fine half an our ago. OK, reading your OP, it seemed that you were getting those errors after turning off the broken DC, but since you're not - seems like you found a good solution.
    • SQL mirroring advise
      IT Discussion • sql replication mirroring sql server 2012 sql 2012 standard sql mirroring • • Ambarishrh  

      16
      1
      Votes
      16
      Posts
      2518
      Views

      @scottalanmiller said in SQL mirroring advise: @Ambarishrh said in SQL mirroring advise: @scottalanmiller said in SQL mirroring advise: @Ambarishrh said in SQL mirroring advise: @scottalanmiller said in SQL mirroring advise: @Ambarishrh said in SQL mirroring advise: @Dashrender said in SQL mirroring advise: Are the two SQL servers sitting side by side? If not, shared storage and low latency for it's use would be super expensive. Though I do wonder how their DR plan works if there isn't a cluster for the DB, what purpose does the second server serve? Warm spare? Yes the servers are side by side, basically just sits there, and when a new site is created on SP side, run the script which mirrors the new DB created on server 1 to server 2. Eventually they were planning to introduce the witness server once our testing is complete and then enable auto failover. The downside here is that someone need to manually run the script for db mirroring of new databases So the big thing here is that the databases are not mirrored, just the framework (schema) is at creation time. Very different from mirroring or clustering at that aspect level. Yes, we've told them this won't work and asked them to look at a clustered setup. Since the licenses are already in place and is SQL standard no option for Always-On. I want to know what would be the drawbacks for the clustered setup, as for sure there are some more advantages on Always-ON compared to the clustered setup. Won't work... for what? What's the end goal? Won't work: Current stage its 2 separate DB servers and mirroring needs to be done by executing a script whenever there is a new db is created by SP. End Goal: A fully automated failover setup giving high availability for the SharePoint solution What they are doing is unrelated to their end goal. How does mirroring database creation help with failover. There isn't even a first step in preparing for a failover here. What is going on is totally something different. Exactly what i was asking earlier.
    • XenServer: Backup & Replication
      IT Discussion • virtualization backup xenserver disaster recovery replication • • FATeknollogee  

      58
      0
      Votes
      58
      Posts
      6172
      Views

      @FATeknollogee said in XenServer: Backup & Replication: I assumed we "are" talking about 7.0? Yes, it works on XS7. @DustinB3403 was running into the same issues I was on 6.5. There is dicsussion that some other process is changing it back, but we have not started to troubleshoot that. (I no longer have any XS6.5 boxes here.)
    • SOLVED Replication cable
      IT Discussion • linux kvm replication gluster • • stacksofplates  

      11
      1
      Votes
      11
      Posts
      1735
      Views

      @stacksofplates said in Replication cable: Finally took some time and Gluster is running on both nodes. I get local speed and network replication :). Nice
    • LAMP replication to DR site
      IT Discussion • linux disaster recovery mysql replication backup and disaster recovery lamp • • Ambarishrh  

      16
      1
      Votes
      16
      Posts
      3162
      Views

      @Ambarishrh said in LAMP replication to DR site: How about setup MySQL replication to remote site and then enable MySQLdump local backup on the DR site as well with increased frequency than daily ( may be twice a day). This way we have an up to date/latest copy and in case let's say there was a drop table command on master, and primary site failed, I can still switch to secondary, use the latest mysql backup to restore and make it up and running. Yup, that's what I would do. Get HA and DR all in one setup. Have it take backups 24 times a day if you want. The impact is pretty much zero.
    • CentOS NFS Virtual Server - Nightly replication to Remote VM
      IT Discussion • replication usb remote backup secondary host • • DustinB3403  

      9
      1
      Votes
      9
      Posts
      1366
      Views

      @Danp That might be exactly what I'm looking for. It certainly seems like it is. I'll have to test it tomorrow when at the office.
    • SOLVED AD Sync between two Sites
      IT Discussion • security active directory replication server 2012 sync issues • • gjacobse  

      16
      3
      Votes
      16
      Posts
      2324
      Views

      @coliver said: repadmin /replicate DC1 DC2 dc=domain,dc=com So I have have limited success.. but success was made. I the user I created on the other end,.. is now on the local AD. I'll look at this more,.. but think it's otherwise solved.
    • UNSOLVED Storage for offsite VM replication
      IT Discussion • storage hyper-v veeam replication vm • • JaredBusch  

      22
      0
      Votes
      22
      Posts
      3281
      Views

      @JaredBusch said: @DenisKelley said: If you are trying to use Veeam, the standard setup would to have a server running a second copy of Veeam B&R at the target site. You'll link the two and configure the replicas. You do not need to purchase a second Veeam license to do this, but you will need a running B&R at the DR site. That was my understanding of how it works, but it has been almost two years since I talked to Veeam about it. With what I've seen with v9, you now can do full failover scripted ahead of time to make it a bit more turn-key during a disaster.