@scottalanmiller said in Sharepoint - Hybrid / Mixed solution?:

@JasGot said in Sharepoint - Hybrid / Mixed solution?:

I'm open to even the wildest ideas.

Is it only MS solutions for documents that they want, or are other options on the table too? Assuming so, but would be foolish not to check.

Yes, MS Only.

@gjacobse said in InfoPath Support:

I don't know all of what is needed - as I'm not included in that circle. But I have been told that one of the littlest things needed is changing an email address. That simple. Change from this person to another person (should be a distro / security group to ....never mind).

We need -the quick fix- so that we can address the point that it's EOL and only going to worsen with support falling off.

make a rule in the the email system that checks for something from that machine and forwards it to the desired location... might be a doable workaround for now.

@Dashrender said in Working with SharePoint Online in Windows:

Would someone please add some tags to this? Great thing to be able to find in the future.

Done

MS licensing on Sharepoint is as easy as licensing gets. It can't be more straightforward.

https://products.office.com/en-us/sharepoint/sharepoint-licensing-overview

"For On-Premises, intranet sites are licensed using a Server/CAL (Client Access License) model. SharePoint Server 2019 is required for each running instance of the software, and CALs are required for each person or device accessing a SharePoint Server."

It's that simple. CALs are requires for each person or device accessing SP. That's it. Nothing more or less. It's not just easy, but exactly what you'd logically expect the licensing to do if they were being rational.

@scottalanmiller said in Nextcloud Troubleshooting:

@mattbagan said in Nextcloud Troubleshooting:

@scottalanmiller I saw that too. I am wondering if I could just delete the folder in question and see if that helps.

Maybe, do a move, not a delete, in case you need to put it back.

Good idea! I moved the folder and it may have taken longer then normal, but it finally loaded again.

@jaredbusch said in Download OneNote Files from Sharepoint:

Pop a Windows 10 VM
Then you have two choices. The built in one note app and also install office current version and use the one note app there.
I suspect that will be the only workable method.

Danielle was trying it with the full client. I'm the only one attempting it with only the web one.

@scottalanmiller said in non VPN Cloud based storage:

@Dashrender said in non VPN Cloud based storage:

@scottalanmiller said in non VPN Cloud based storage:

@Dashrender said in non VPN Cloud based storage:

@scottalanmiller said in non VPN Cloud based storage:

@Dashrender said in non VPN Cloud based storage:

Cost is an issue? Assuming you got hosted SharePoint only I think it's $4/u/m...

Tiny capacity, though.

1 TB per user?

That's ODfB. The Sharepoint storage proper is like 100MB.

OMG, that's near useless!

It's only for documents. Goes a long way when used as intended.

Used as intended? That's a joke, right? Storing large PDFs should be a part of the intention. DWG files can be huge.

@Shuey said in Free SharePoint?:

@Carnival-Boy Cool, I'll look into that.

If I was going to try a P2V of this server, what would be the best way to go about it?

I could consider a cold clone (the only disc I have available to try this is the VMware cold clone 3.0.3 disc; not sure if that will work or not) Another option I was considering is installing VMware Standalone Converter, then booting into DSRM mode and performing the P2V. Once the server was successfully converted, I'd shutdown the existing server, fire up the virtual, and make sure the IP was the same.

Thoughts on these options, or other possibilities?

The best case scenario is that the P2V jacks AD totally and forces a total rebuild of the environment that allows you to demonstrate to the owners that bad-IT is just another term for "wasting money" and that would give you a chance to start fresh.

@JaredBusch said in Ideas for ITSP and MSP Internal and Customer Documentation:

@jmoore said in Ideas for ITSP and MSP Internal and Customer Documentation:

Didn't have time to mess with anything last night because of family. Hopefully tonight. I'm excited to try Wiki.js and Bookstack

If I was turning up something for only IT, and had the authority to force people to use it, I would only use Wiki.js. I totally love the git based backup thing.

Yeah, thankfully we have that flexibility.

This functionality is coming soon ™ to a Sharepoint near you. I saw it on the roadmap a few days ago.

I shared this with my parent company and they did an evaluation, but found that its not really useful for them. Initial feedback was " the application supports files only - no other objects (list items, etc.)"

Anyone checked this already and is this the case?

@jt1001001 said in SharePoint reverse proxy replacement for MS ForeFront UAG:

@JaredBusch no just Godaddy certs so far. You probably found the same blog posts I did:
http://blog.ganser.com/automate-lets-encrypt-certificate-renew-and-deployment-to-kemp-loadbalancer/

I did not find that one, and it is exactly the right thing.

I can update my cron to call a script instead of certbot renew and then have it use the Kemp API to push the cert after a renew.

So now on to setting up multiple certs per virtual service. read a post that I couldn't. if I can't this gets harder too.

Because LE on IIS still is not pretty.

Anyone ever try the products from Metalogix? If downloaded Essentials for Drives: File Shares to OneDrive Freemium, but I never received the activation code via email.

I am currently working on the storage planning for Veeam and found this site http://rps.dewin.me/

@Ambarishrh

Learn Sharepoint Training Tutorial is an online and offline platform for sharepoint seekers. Those who are looking for free online tutorial videos and training.
http://www.learnsharepointtrainingtutorial.net.in/
http://www.learnsharepointtrainingtutorial.net.in/

My image above is pulled from OWA - which allows me to save directly to my ODfB while never touching or using my machine in any real way to make the transfer happen.

@Ambarishrh said:

Is it a good practice to have a firewall first between internet and WFE servers and then between WFE and Application Servers? I am looking for a design diagram for such a setup

Depends on your needs. For a small setup, probably unnecessary. For compliance, potentially required.

We use firewalls against every single device on our network at the VM level. Communication in and out is always monitored and we have procedures on allowing traffic through. This provides compliance and proper lockdown between machines.

Don't think of the firewall as another device. If you have a single device, additional subnets with it inspecting the traffic is sufficient.