@scottalanmiller

Already we set as same in all windows permissions in both source and destination created datasets. Then how ?

@scottalanmiller said in Resources for ScreenConnect on CentOS 7:

@dafyre said in Resources for ScreenConnect on CentOS 7:

@gjacobse said in Resources for ScreenConnect on CentOS 7:

@scottalanmiller said in Resources for ScreenConnect on CentOS 7:

@JaredBusch said in Resources for ScreenConnect on CentOS 7:

@scottalanmiller said in Resources for ScreenConnect on CentOS 7:

At 2GB, we never see it need it all. It's decently lean.

Been watching things and it seems to need another CPU. Everytime I click on something on the webpage, the CPU spikes to 100%.

I think that we use two.

Since we are having issue with our system

$ sysctl vm.swappiness vm.swappiness = 30

Why not go lower to say... 10 ?

That's what I set them to 😉

Just checked - It's 30...

$ uptime 17:48:06 up 1 day, 3:02, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.04, 0.07 $ sysctl vm.swappiness vm.swappiness = 30 ~~

@wirestyle22 said in Web Hosting Options:

@scottalanmiller said in Web Hosting Options:

A Small Orange uses cPanel and has been very good.

I love a small orange. Have never had a bad experience with them.

It's been great here.

@travisdh1 said in NextCloud and PHP 7:

Mostly because I either missed it, or never used it in favor of PHP7.

WTF?

I was speaking of the people on the NextCloud forum. You would still use SCL for any PHP > 5.4 on RHEL

We have Spiceworks setup. People email an address we have setup for help. Spiceworks sucks in the email and creates the ticket. Other than when we respond out of it people don't know anything about the ticketing system. You can really change how and when Spiceworks sends out emails, making it almost invisible to the end user. I recommend some type of ticketing system just for tracking purposes.

Gotcha. There might be some graphical utilities for snapshotting. But really this is just not a thing that is needed on Linux. It's a fundamentally different Os than Windows and the idea of system restoration like Windows does would be weird.

@JaredBusch said in Hidden VoIP.ms restrictions:

@rustcohle said in Hidden VoIP.ms restrictions:

With flowroute I watch my rtp stream go to the terminating carrier they are sending me to.

Who cares about this. You buy service. You stop caring once you hand off to them. If they cannot provide quality and you have a solid hand off, you find a different provider.

I think the transparent approach is preferable. Also they are the only pure SIP CLEC I've seen to date.

Not sure if voip.ms has their own interconnects to local exchanges though, seems possible with all their proxy locations.

I watched a VUC episode when flowroute was on years back and I agreed with a lot the guy had to say about the state of Clecs and providers like bandwidth. I had just always assumed voip.ms was more of a hobbyist provider like pbxes.com

Then again, maybe pbxes.com is also used a lot in production....

ok Thank you all

If you see this, check your logs, I found this in mind, it was php-pdo missing. Actually it was not missing, but httpd had not been restarted since it was installed.

[Thu Mar 09 02:49:16.682471 2017] [:error] [pid 3611] [client 192.168.88.245:34266] {"reqId":"WMC0nFFrJ-GCwZGoc2zWYQAAAAo","remoteAddr":"192.168.88.245","app":"index","message":"Exception: {\\"Exception\\":\\"Error\\",\\"Message\\":\\"Class 'PDO' not found\\",\\"Code\\":0,\\"Trace\\":\\"#0 \\\\\\/var\\\\\\/www\\\\\\/html\\\\\\/nextcloud\\\\\\/lib\\\\\\/private\\\\\\/Setup.php(171): OC\\\\\\\\Setup->getAvailableDbDriversForPdo()\\\\n#1 \\\\\\/var\\\\\\/www\\\\\\/html\\\\\\/nextcloud\\\\\\/lib\\\\\\/private\\\\\\/legacy\\\\\\/util.php(658): OC\\\\\\\\Setup->getSupportedDatabases()\\\\n#2 \\\\\\/var\\\\\\/www\\\\\\/html\\\\\\/nextcloud\\\\\\/lib\\\\\\/base.php(692): OC_Util::checkServer(Object(OC\\\\\\\\AllConfig))\\\\n#3 \\\\\\/var\\\\\\/www\\\\\\/html\\\\\\/nextcloud\\\\\\/lib\\\\\\/base.php(1092): OC::init()\\\\n#4 \\\\\\/var\\\\\\/www\\\\\\/html\\\\\\/nextcloud\\\\\\/index.php(38): require_once('\\\\\\/var\\\\\\/www\\\\\\/html\\\\\\/n...')\\\\n#5 {main}\\",\\"File\\":\\"\\\\\\/var\\\\\\/www\\\\\\/html\\\\\\/nextcloud\\\\\\/lib\\\\\\/private\\\\\\/Setup.php\\",\\"Line\\":115}","level":3,"time":"2017-03-09T01:49:16+00:00","method":"GET","url":"\\/nextcloud\\/index.php","user":"--","version":""}

Are you using mate or cinnamon? You can set the num lock and caps lock with gconf so it will stay the same with mate. I'm assuming Cinnamon is using dconf like Gnome3.

@JaredBusch said in Excel to SQL - Need Some Normalization Tips:

@garak0410 said in Excel to SQL - Need Some Normalization Tips:

So, what I am looking for is the proper way to store these notes in a database and have it tie back to the matching customer. I've imported this into SQL and while it worked, I still have the problem of how to display the data from the columns. Management stills wants one large field that displays the notes, most likely with a vertical scroll bar to through through them.

Do not worry about how to store the data.
Start with what you need to end up with and how it will be entered.
Those are two different things.
But those two will form the basis for what your data will have to be.

So supposing you have these entry fields.

ID Customer (multiple fields for info, name, account #, etc.) Note 1 Note 2 Note 3

You were posting about making multiple tables and getting close to 3rd normal form.

Works great, and is good design of course, but you also need to think about the purpose of this application.

But do you need to get that complicated? Any relational database can take all that in a single table with as many columns as needed.

The purpose is to see what special requirements there are for certain customers. We currently have 145 regular customers who have special needs when we design a building for them. We want to be able to display the customers in a cleaner format and also make it easy for a designated person to update as needed.

And I am, for now, going to use Access because I need something quick and within my current skill level. And yes, when my skills expand, I do plan on redesigning this. The main problem I am having is displaying the notes. Each single note per customer is it's own field. For example, look at this wizard:

0_1489002763830_access02.jpg

In creating a form,. it's wants me to select each note field and ends up looking like this:

0_1489002881856_access03.jpg

This isn't want management wants and it will also cause problems for customers who need more than 16 "notes." They want to see the customer name, address, contact number and all notes associated with it. It would be nice to see all notes in a scrollable window. Not sure how easy that would be with Access but I'm thinking it would be. This is where I may be confused if I need normalization or not.

@DustinB3403 said in OneNote - Share Across Devices - User rant:

OneNote locally to their hard drive, and then moan about their hard drive failing with OneNote saved locally.

huh, that's weird.. by default OneNote wants to make you put it on OneDrive (at least it used to) so making it be local would require extra work.

I'm with Jared, either DDNS or a central system that is static and sites that are dynamic. Are there cases for static IP at the office, of course. But I think that they are pretty rare these days and getting rarer.

@travisdh1 said in SSL between a proxy and its target:

@Dashrender said in SSL between a proxy and its target:

@dafyre said in SSL between a proxy and its target:

@scottalanmiller said in SSL between a proxy and its target:

Never had to do that. Seems like a script to pull it from time to time might be enough, though?

Set up a passwordless scp of the /etc/letsencrypt (or /etc/certbot?) folder from the proxy to the internal machine?

Any security risk to this? I don't know anything about it - I just see passwordless and have to ask.

It's industry standard public/private key encryption, so shouldn't be an issue.

You should go read up on SQRL. In my not so humble opinion, passwords have long outlived the point where they are a useful security mechanism.

I'm fully aware of SQRL - I asked Scott on Day one of ML if he would support it when it became available, sadly it's still not released to the wild 😞

Question: have you tried setting up the DHCP server as the time master, and having the Centos system sync time to the DHCP server (with said DHCP server syncing to NIST or whatever time source you prefer) instead of the NTP Pool? That way theoretically DHCP server and Centos should be at the same time. Just a thought.

This is the NextCloud information that @scottalanmiller was talking about.

This is still a consistent problem. Does not seem to occur if I'm not using cached exchange mode but that is required on my network.