@scottalanmiller Yeah, it was a test box on Vultr, and in the end, I'll probably just reinstall it, but the fact that it's doing this is bothering me, especially thinking about if it would be a production box. Oh well, thanks for the help.
This is exactly what the original Surface was. A Windows only piece of hardware. ARM based, Secure Boot locked Windows only computer. I have no problem with that, while not blatantly obvious, anyone reading the specs would realize this.
@Carnival-Boy still looking to move Sharepoint? Any progress.
I'd forgotten that Microsoft has killed Foundation (2013 will be the last version), so there is no longer a free version of Sharepoint. If you need it, you have to pay for it. I'd forgotten this even though I actually posted it on ML a year ago (I think my memory is going in my old age).
Add that to the fact that it appears that migrating from on-premise to online is not a simple task (compared with say Exchange), and I'm coming round to thinking it would be foolish to further invest in Sharepoint Foundation 2013 and we're better off moving to Sharepoint online asap. It will mean extra cost in the short-term, because we'll have to buy a load of O365 subscriptions, but less cost in the long-term (as eventually we will have to migrate from on-premise to online since Foundation is the only product that makes financial sense on-premise and Foundation has been killed).
Hence why I used onenote or something local to my phone.....
You know OneNote run on Azure right?
You realize that OneNote runs locally and syncs to Azure? Possibly if you have no Office 365 subscription there is some limit on this, but none that I am aware of.
oh yeah of course JB said that hours ago.
š
Yeah, even know we consumers aren't in on those meetings, I would like to know what happened...while not as high profile as some apps, 36 hours downtime is terrible for any service...
@travisdh1 I guess I should note that I got a laugh because the route to go from our site in Killbuck, OH to our host in Walla Walla, WA went
Cincinnati, OH
Los Angeles, CA
Monroe, AR
Chicago, IL
New York, NY
Philadelphia, PA
Atlanta, GA
Seattle, WA
Walla Walla, WA
Nothing like traversing the entire country 3 times to help with latency, right? Even with that, latency only averages 87ms with the Piladelphia -> Atlanta link being the slowest of the bunch.
I've been under the impression that's how it always was... Red Hat patches a vulnerability or changes something, then CentOS does.
It's how it was when CentOS wasn't part of Red Hat. Now CentOS isn't a company, just a product of Red Hat. So Red Hat is patching both. So your statement above can be rephrased to...
I was under the wrong premise. Whoops... thanks for the clarification. Did not get those answers over at SW. Another reason I love ML.
Lots of big time CentOS users here š It was good before RH bought them, but way better since they did. Used to be even months behind in releases. Not like that at all anymore.
RH has to keep CentOS patched to maintain their reputation as the most enterprise OS option in the SMB and commodity spaces.
Yeah I live under a rock. We don't get updates about that kind of stuff in the desert. Also, please send food and Internet.
I know a successful wireless ISP and basically in his part of the country it's cost prohibitive to get copper, let alone fiber, to his customers.
I have worked with a successful fixed wireless company in the past as well. it is most certainly a good solution as long as it is done correctly. Not really any different than any other solution. Do it right and it works well.
Exactly. It's almost all about the ISP in question, not the technology itself.
And to clarify for the naysayers. The ISP includes the installation.
