@JaredBusch said in Awesome new tool for checking if your building is lit with fiber or not:
@Buildinglit said in Awesome new tool for checking if your building is lit with fiber or not:
@Jason Naw it's not for spamming. But good feedback that you were concerned for that.
Then remove the requirement for an email address.
And even company name.
Bahahahahah
http://www.indeed.com/cmp/Rockfab-Kitchen-and-Bath/jobs/IT-Support-Specialist-f7c83252a09da78e
I actually contacted them to let them know this is a marketing/PR job not an IT job and the pretty much told me to go F yourself.
How do you guys handle them? Right now we proactively failover and shutdown them if we know there's likely to be issues anyway rather than let them automatically fail-over after something does happen.
We do both load Balancing and fail over with all of them so it's not a big deal either way, we just do it to prevent any damage from the center being powered up.
@IRJ said:
This is only news because that family of the thug, thinks they are entitled to everything somehow.
FTFY
This has become by far my favorite RDP software, just bought a copy to use for work. It can do many other things besides RDP (VNC, SSH, Webpages etc). I'd highly recommend it.
@Dashrender said in Home theater audio:
So hopped on Google,
First link Rocketfish wireless speaker connection.
Anyone have an opinion on Rocketfish stuff
It's a bestbuy store brand - enough said.
Why do so many other companies (mostly small ones) expect us to work with them to fix their issues when they have issues with emails or PDFs that they make are corrupt.
Makes no sense. We already have a job we don't need a second. Sad thing is users actually expect that we'd do this.
@JaredBusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@Dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
OMG I've become a millenial! - I'm listening Youtube vids while working...
I think that most people would say "How can you be a millennial if you are working?"
Though on that point I would say whose fault is it that the millennial generation is like this enough to be stereotyped? The parents and society their parents created.
I'm technically a millennial (though an early one) and I've had a job since I was 14... I know plenty of people both old and young to work the system (welfare etc) just so they don't have to work. It's not restricted to a generation. It's a lazy society.
https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20160210-asa-ike
A vulnerability in the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) version 1 (v1) and IKE version 2 (v2) code of Cisco ASA Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a reload of the affected system or to remotely execute code.
The vulnerability is due to a buffer overflow in the affected code area. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted UDP packets to the affected system. An exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code and obtain full control of the system or to cause a reload of the affected system.
Well this site is about three levels below spiceworks now.
@scottalanmiller said in analog video stream:
@Jason said in analog video stream:
@scottalanmiller said in analog video stream:
@Jason said in analog video stream:
You mean meeting presentation software? yeah that has nothing to do with live broadcast.
Right, neither does this thread
It's just two other rooms watching what is going on in the sanctuary.
Which is a broadcast feed but okay. Whatever you can't take sense into anyone here.
Well by that logic, meeting presentation is broadcast too. One presenter, multiple recipients. So it's all broadcast then.
No, No it's not.
@scottalanmiller said in analog video stream:
@Jason said in analog video stream:
You mean meeting presentation software? yeah that has nothing to do with live broadcast.
Right, neither does this thread
Which is a broadcast feed but okay. Whatever you can't take sense into anyone here.
@scottalanmiller said in analog video stream:
@Jason said in analog video stream:
Keep in mind this is not the modern way. Any professional AV company suggesting a solution like Scotts should be fired immediately. It's so freaking oblivious he has no professional AV experience but keeps pretending like his is the expert on the matter. Dude get over it. This forum is official worse than Spiceworks. So many idiotic suggestions that are lower than consumer level.
Ah, but this isn't a professional AV situation, so what is the purpose of that comment? I think you've missed the boat. This is about getting a quick, easy and cheap feed from the sanctuary into two other rooms. If a professional AV company was involved, someone would have seriously missed the goals. So I take that as a compliment that I stayed focused to the goal and wasn't just showboating that I know AV. I'm trying to solve a business problem, but prove that I know AV club skills.
Bahahahah. You people are insane.
@thanksajdotcom said in analog video stream:
@Jason said in analog video stream:
Keep in mind this is not the modern way. Any professional AV company suggesting a solution like Scotts should be fired immediately. It's so freaking oblivious he has no professional AV experience but keeps pretending like his is the expert on the matter. Dude get over it. This forum is official worse than Spiceworks. So many idiotic suggestions that are lower than consumer level.
Really? Because companies like Adobe, Cisco and Citrix have GoTo Meeting, Webex, and whatever Adobe's presentation software is called now. The world has been moving in this direction, as far as live feeds, broadcasting, etc. And "it's so freaking oblivious" that you are actually the one who is demonstrating how oblivious you are. Spending more now to ensure you are ready for the future makes every sense. Implementing admittedly outdated systems because they are cheaper now is a, at best, short-term gain (because of cost-savings) with a long-term loss. Implement a modern system now and then you are ready for future adjustments/additions.
You mean meeting presentation software? yeah that has nothing to do with live broadcast.
Keep in mind this is not the modern way. Any professional AV company suggesting a solution like Scotts should be fired immediately. It's so freaking oblivious he has no professional AV experience but keeps pretending like his is the expert on the matter. Dude get over it. This forum is official worse than Spiceworks. So many idiotic suggestions that are lower than consumer level.
and if they have money to blow:
http://www.vaddio.com/category/live-production-solutions
http://www.vaddio.com/category/vaddio-hd-ptz-cameras
but you will never get the same motion with a PTZ as you will a real camera. They look robotic and fake.
Personally I'd recomend getting a used Sony FS100 or a Panasonic HMC150 used. connecting up HDMI out and sending that over a long HDMI or CAT6 to HDMI system to the TV.
@stacksofplates said in analog video stream:
@DustinB3403 said in analog video stream:
@stacksofplates said in analog video stream:
I would stay away from IP cameras. Use a real camera with a real mic, or its going to sound like garbled mush. It shard enough to get good sounding sanctuaries let alone using a junk camera/ mic to record with.
Or just put the microphone on the stage and feed that in. An IP mic would work just as well.
On stage would be really hard to do because you can't get the full range of everything, and if you directly feed in the aux from the mixer you will pick up every pop and hum and off tone person.
Yup you need a sub-mix (digital boards can do this as a matrix, Send etc, analog would have to use an aux mix) but you need an audience mic or two to mix in with it... but they must be delayed based on placement from the speakers
@scottalanmiller said in analog video stream:
@brianlittlejohn said in analog video stream:
@scottalanmiller said in analog video stream:
@DustinB3403 said in analog video stream:
@Mike-Davis said in analog video stream:
@DustinB3403 There isn't a budget. Someone bought two TVs, and then came to me and asked me what else they needed. I guessing the TVs aren't smart TVs. Even if they are, I just tried taking a Foscam camera I had and going to it from the web browser in my samsung smart TV. It flat out didn't work. I could get to the web page, but the "server push" mode wouldn't work. (I knew the Active X mode wasn't going to work.) On my laptop, I only get audio if I download a plug in, so I don't think a camera like that is going to work on most TVs.
The other camera I have on my bench is a Ubiquiti Unifi G3 dome. I know I can't view that with a browser, so I'm going to have to set up a server just to test that unless I'm missing something.
Something you might be able to do which may be easier is to use an IP camera, and OBS, use the IP camera as a source within OBS and then make a youtube stream.
I've not got to try this before personally (using OBS and an IP camera) but I can't imagine it's not doable.
Oh, that's a potentially good idea. Get the video to YouTube then you don't have to worry about compatibility. The only issue is bandwidth.
Broadcasting on Youtube could bring in a whole new set of licensing issues for the music used during the service... just a thought.
Likely that licensing is either already handled or already a problem. But possibly there is a limit there. But can't you make YouTube private so the licensing would remain the same?
Churches are exempt from licesning music used as part of a normally schedule worship service. This exemption does not cover lyrics projected hence CCLI, nor broadcast or online steaming, podcast etc. nor does it cover special services (plays, musicals, etc)