@Rob-Dunn said:

Looks cool - I'll have to try this out. For all the flashiness of the site (I'm guessing non-English speakers), you'd think there would a little more attention given to the grammar...some of the wording on the main page is...off.

Chinese site.

I guess we got lucky. We tried to install that update and the update download kept failing due to NVidia's shoddy download system. So I gave up and haven't gotten back to it yet. Guess I will hold off, then.

@Lakshmana said:

There are two difference present here.That is the user in 1st wing has the Windows 7 who faces the slowness issue but the same user logged in the url in 2nd wing with windows 8 OS there is no issue in loading the pages or url.

Whether the OS has issue in accessing the url??

Does using an IP address not work? Using the term URL here is very weird and misleading. You don't "access a URL", it's just an alias to an address.

@DustinB3403 said:

LDAP and Kerberos would be the nearest equivalent that I'm aware of.

Huh? That's nothing like NAP, nap is a collection of plocies. Other devices tie into it with RADIUS. LDAP only provides authentication, not authorization based on conditions like NAP does

@scottalanmiller said:

@JaredBusch said:

@scottalanmiller said:

@JaredBusch said:

@scottalanmiller said:

@JaredBusch said:

While I have never made a how to with a port range, the basic firewalld syntax is used all over the place on this forum by me and every system that I have ever seen that accepts a port range does so with the range hyphenated from lower boundary to upper boundary.

I would have thought that this was a colon, though, not a hyphen.

I have never seen it commonly used with a colon to represent a range

Native IPTables. 🙂

I rarely work with native IPTables. That would explain a difference in point of view.

Yeah, and for me I pretty much have done raw edits on /etc/sysconfig/iptables and never used external tools. Now with FirewallD I'm relearning the syntax for everything on Linux firewalls.

Well, at least I'm not the only one then. Learning how to use firewall-cmd still feels a bit odd.

@scottalanmiller said:

@wirestyle22 said:

@Mike-Davis said:

@JaredBusch said:

That is just a silly thing to say. PoE and PoE+ require, per the IEEE standard, category 5, but is still allowed to be ran on category 3 for lower wattage workloads.

I haven't installed many PoE+ cameras and have only had those running less than a year. Do you have a number of PoE+ cameras running on CAT5? Longer runs? I'm wondering why the camera company I was dealing made such a big deal about 23 guage CAT6 for their cameras. Maybe because it had a heater?

You mean a heater as in a heating unit? I guess? A quality cat5e cable will tolerate temperatures from -4 to 167 degrees Fahrenheit. Keep in mind I run a lot of cabling for my company but I am by no means a cabling guru. Maybe they know something I don't. shrug

He means a heater in the camera enclosure.

WELP. I took a chance boys.

I don't have to typically deal with harsh winters even though we were hit with a sizable blizzard this year in NJ.

On top of Chromebooks being the top need for average users, they've also become the best sellers for them, too.

Like the others, I'd recommend using VLANs only if you need them to secure something. For instance, in a college where I worked previously, I helped migrate from the stacks of switches that @scottalanmiller mentions to a network using VLANs to separate student traffic from the admin traffic.

You will definitely need a router (or layer 3 switch) or firewall to ensure that the VLANs have access to the internet, but not to one another.

@dafyre said:

But you posted it in a public forum... Spamming to commence in 3...2...1...

Sorry, that was a (poorly executed, I guess) joke about guessing account names.

@JaredBusch said:

@scottalanmiller said:

@dafyre said:

@scottalanmiller said:

@sreekumarpg said:

Also looking for a centralize console (single dashboard ) for monitoring all the backups and report on the activities. Push restore from the console

that we can't get from Veeam free 🙂

The Veeam free products don't offer that, but their paid versions do.

They have a paid version of their desktop backup tool?

No, but if you have a paid Veeam solution and point Endpoint Backup at it you can see status there as well as get email notifications.

Ah, good to know. What not aware of any integration.

@Dashrender said:

@johnhooks said:

@Dashrender said:

@johnhooks said:

You don't need a third party store. If you're dumb enough you can just go to the internet and download the first apk you find and install it.

I'm not sure what you're driving at? Of course you can - so? it still requires checking the box to allow third party things to be installed.

I guess I'm confused what your point was here

Just wondering, why did you mention side loading required checking the box, but not installing a third party store?

You mentioned that you don't need a third party store, that if someone was dumb enough they could just download an APK and install it.

I specifically mentioned side-loading, so I wasn't sure what you were driving at? What makes side loading any dumber than installing a third party store?

Ah that's what I didn't get. When I read it I thought you were saying you needed a third party app store after you checked the box. I just misunderstood your statement.

@hobbit666 said:

Quick question.
What config file do I edit in Centos7 to change the web interface of zabbix from using 80 to something like 8088??

Sorted...
I forgot Firewalld was running when I edited the httpd.conf file and was trying to test it.

@tonyshowoff said:

@aaronstuder said:

@scottalanmiller Do you know what they say about assuming? 😜

It makes an ass out of you.

It's also the mother of all foulups.

@sreekumarpg said:

Need to know anyone is using this feature and how benefit it is ? . Does the exchange share calendar work with rackspace email ? Does the resource mailbox is accessible by rackspace email users ?

They might now, but back when we were using Rackspace Email (which was excellent) it did not, so you had two completely independent pools of users. All that they could do was email each other.

@Dashrender said:

Here's another option someone else found.

@VivekSharma..

i too was installing the client access on win 7 32 bit, it work perfectlty, but when installing on windows 7 64 bit got the error XCOPYFILE-2 error, each time on every machine win 7 64 bit, so then to be able to installed the client access, i’ve put the windows 64 bit on safe mode, on an administrator account, then start the client access on compatibility mode, win xp sp3, and start the installation, and the program install corectly, then restart the computer in normal mode, and use the client access.. it works without any error. on every machine.

Well this might have worked in WIn7 x64, but does not in Windows x64

If it is a restart of the Hyper-V host, then check the services once it fails to respond like that.

I wouldn't say "blazing", but it got alot faster since I moved away from Bell 😛 Right now I am on a 100/10 connection.

@johnhooks said:

@scottalanmiller

but it uses Ubuntu 14.04, I believe, which I am not going to touch

You say from your 14.04 based Mint laptop 😛

I know, I hate that they decided to do that.

@scottalanmiller said:

@johnhooks said:

Well looks like I might actually have to go over there. I tried to switch users and it looks like it's stuck or something. TeamViewer is hung on a cannot display error. Suck.

Never seen that with SC, just saying 😉

Well I normally use NoMachine and connect to the ZT network I set up for them. But somehow she screwed that up as well. So this was a last ditch effort to get something working.

So in the end I use Robocopy just to get the file transfer over. Still, we cannot rename or add any other files to the same folder.

(space), and symbols. I have to remove the symbol temporary just to get robocopy does its job. As for spaces, you will need to put quotation between the space.
\Program" "Files\ instead of \Program Files\ or "Program Files"\