ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Topics
    2. Categories
    3. IT Discussion
    Log in to post
    Load new posts
    • Recently Replied
    • Recently Created
    • Most Posts
    • Most Votes
    • Most Views
    • sreekumarpgS

      Best Access Point with Hardware Controller

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      7
      0 Votes
      7 Posts
      1k Views
      ObsolesceO

      Definitely ubiquiti

    • DustinB3403D

      Why are local drives better

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      57
      1 Votes
      57 Posts
      6k Views
      StrongBadS

      @scottalanmiller said in Why are local drives better:

      @StrongBad said in Why are local drives better:

      @Oles-Borys do you have any information on the pricing for ACloudA? Seems like a really interesting product.

      I'm having beers with aclouda right now.

      What? What craziness is that?

    • anthonyhA

      XMLStarlet - Argument List Too Long

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved xmlstarlet
      9
      1 Votes
      9 Posts
      1k Views
      anthonyhA

      Well that was a fail. The append function was not what I thought it was. It's for elements within the XML file, not the value of a given element. Arg. Hmm...

    • S

      Firebird !

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      7
      2 Votes
      7 Posts
      841 Views
      scottalanmillerS

      @Slackmaker said in Firebird !:

      Thanks !
      Resolved ;=)

      Wow, that's awesome that that was all that it was. I was shooting in the dark there a bit 🙂

    • scottalanmillerS

      Public Cloud vs. Hosted Hyperconvergence Costing Project

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved hyperconvergence hyperconverged scale scale hc3 colocation america amazon aws vultr
      40
      8 Votes
      40 Posts
      8k Views
      scottalanmillerS

      @gjacobse said in Public Cloud vs. Hosted Hyperconvergence Costing Project:

      @scottalanmiller said in Public Cloud vs. Hosted Hyperconvergence Costing Project:

      @gjacobse looks like you quoted but forgot to write anything?

      Was back reading - deleted as I wasn't intending to reply

      LOL, fail.

    • DustinB3403D

      New StarWind Virtual SAN Free - All restrictions removed!

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved starwind vsan san storage starwind vsan
      57
      10 Votes
      57 Posts
      13k Views
      scottalanmillerS

      @jt1001001 said in New StarWind Virtual SAN Free - All restrictions removed!:

      In case you didn't see, the webinar is now up on their site:
      https://www.starwindsoftware.com/starwind-virtual-san-free-all-restrictions-removed

      THanks

    • Mike DavisM

      Zabbix gone wild

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved
      32
      1 Votes
      32 Posts
      2k Views
      scottalanmillerS

      Perfect timing...

      0_1492004454476_Screenshot from 2017-04-12 15-40-27.png

    • NetworkNerdN

      VMware VSAN 6.6 Release

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved vsan vmware vmware vsan vmware vsan 6.6
      1
      2 Votes
      1 Posts
      835 Views
      No one has replied
    • masterartsM

      What are your expectations for future versions of WordPress?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      2
      1 Votes
      2 Posts
      370 Views
      scottalanmillerS

      Not an expectation, but would love to see alternative back ends like NoSQL options. At large scale it would be very beneficial.

    • sreekumarpgS

      SQL Multi Site Failover High Availability Suggestions

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      12
      2 Votes
      12 Posts
      2k Views
      travisdh1T

      @sreekumarpg said in SQL Multi Site Failover High Availability Suggestions:

      Thanks All for the valid comments.

      Management is looking for a low cost solution , Currently we are having a two Physical Windows Server 2012 R2 standard Cluster with Microsoft SQL 2014 standard edition. Storage is Dell compellent. This setup is done in Datacenter A and In datacenter B we are having two Physical Windows Server 2012 R2 standard Cluster with Microsoft SQL 2014 standard edition and storage is Dell equallogic.

      Now the application is configured to send data to both SQL cluster and in outage or maintenance we are reconnecting all services to Datacenter B.

      Requirement is to reduce the manual process and only doing a DNS change or Load balance change should move service from Datacenter A to Datacenter B and SQL data should be the same. SQL alwayson seems to be the exact solution but not in budget.

      So why are you even worrying about this any more. Management said it's to expensive, so you or your boss should tell them to stand by that decision.

      Edit: Easier said than done I know, but the decision is out of your hands.

    • jrcJ

      Substitutes for Active Directory and Windows Server

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      37
      1 Votes
      37 Posts
      6k Views
      dbeatoD

      @alefattorini said in Substitutes for Active Directory and Windows Server:

      u're not forced to do it. You can install a module on a server and another module on another sharing the userbase. NethServer can join another remote NethServer using LDAP or AD
      Scenario:

      NethServer1: firewall with VPN, Proxy, ecc..
      NethServer2: mailserver, personal cloud and fileserver

      NethServer1 joins NethServer2 so you can use NethServer2 users/groups for authenticated proxy or VPN users
      That's just a pretty simple example.

      Oh yeah, I agree with NethServer, I was just saying about Zentyal. I have used it in the past and not a big fan. I just came too late to the post so sorry 😞

    • T

      Bloging

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      29
      1 Votes
      29 Posts
      3k Views
      Minion QueenM

      @RojoLoco said in Bloging:

      @Minion-Queen said in Bloging:

      @NetworkNerd said in Bloging:

      If you tag everything correctly, you could use ML as your platform - https://mangolassi.it/tags/networknerd blog. I haven't written as many as I would like, but hopefully the ones I have are helpful to others.

      Actually I am all for that idea 🙂

      All our blog are belong to you?

      Something like that. Free Content!!!

    • StrongBadS

      Azure AD Open Source Alternative

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved azure ad open source active directory
      5
      0 Votes
      5 Posts
      2k Views
      scottalanmillerS

      @coliver said in Azure AD Open Source Alternative:

      @StrongBad said in Azure AD Open Source Alternative:

      Samba 4 does what AD does, for free. But I'm not aware of anything that does what Azure AD does using open source software that you can host yourself. Does anyone know if something exists?

      I guess what are you looking for? Azure AD is basically hosted AD with some limitations as to client management.

      It's a totally different technology. Azure AD is a competitor with hosted AD. It's not AD in any way. Very different technologies. One is a LAN design and one is LANless as well.

    • wirestyle22W

      Veeam 9.5 Configuration

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved veeam backup veeam backup and replication
      4
      1 Votes
      4 Posts
      1k Views
      wirestyle22W

      Reinstallation fixed it but I don't know why.

    • bbigfordB

      SharePoint 2013 - Alert Me not working

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      2
      1 Votes
      2 Posts
      578 Views
      StrongBadS

      Does that email address definitely work?

    • openitO

      Are Servers on VMs are Safe from Ransomware ?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      26
      1 Votes
      26 Posts
      5k Views
      Oles BorysO

      Theoretically, the guest system is totally isolated by the VM and cannot even "see" the host, let alone attack it; so the guest cannot break out of the VM. Of course, in practice, it has occasionally happened. An attack requires exploiting a security issue (i.e. a programming bug which turns out to have nasty consequences) in the VM implementation or, possibly, the hardware features on which the VM builds on. There are few exit routes for data out of the VM; e.g., for Internet access, the VM is emulating a virtual network card, which deals only with the lowest level packets, not full TCP/IP -- thus, most IP-stack issues remain confined within the VM itself. So bugs leading to breakout from VM tend to remain rare occurrences.

      There are some kinds of attacks against which VM are very effective, e.g. fork bombs. From the point of view of the host system, the VM is a single process. A fork bomb in the guest will bring to its knees the scheduler in the guest OS, but for the host this will be totally harmless. Similarly for memory: the VM emulates a physical machine with a given amount of RAM, and will need about that amount of "real" RAM to back it up efficiently. Regardless of what the guest does, the VM will never monopolize more RAM than that. (You still want to limit VM RAM size to, say, at most 1/2 of your physical RAM size, because the extra "real" RAM is handy for disk caching; and the host OS will want to use some, too.)

      Taken into account that malware/ransomware is implemented on the file level, the best method of protection would be based on a block level recovery tool.

      In addition, the best way to overlook the possibility of loosing your data would be the implementation of the the 3-2-1 rule. Its a quite common safety measure in the data infrastructure. We actually implement it quite often, it is based on the replication of your data between 3 nodes as well as creating 2 real-time replication copies of the data between the nodes and storing a single copy of your data in a VTL on the cloud.

      For any other additional information, I would like to suggest you to take a look at the following article - https://knowledgebase.starwindsoftware.com/explanation/the-3-2-1-backup-rule/

    • travisdh1T

      Dell R510 RAID Battery Replacement

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved dell raid battery
      16
      3 Votes
      16 Posts
      4k Views
      scottalanmillerS

      @Tim_G said in Dell R510 RAID Battery Replacement:

      Okay I realize I totally hijacked your thread. Can I get this split off as a new topic in the sam-sd forum?

      I'll do that once I'm at a real computer.

    • LakshmanaL

      KDE neon modem detected Internet not working

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      2
      0 Votes
      2 Posts
      446 Views
      scottalanmillerS

      If you do an nslookup of something, what do you get?

    • hobbit666H

      OS for display TV

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      38
      1 Votes
      38 Posts
      4k Views
      JaredBuschJ

      @scottalanmiller said in OS for display TV:

      @black3dynamite said in OS for display TV:

      Has anyone ever use the Intel Compute stick on a projector?

      We were just talking about doing that today!

      You're going to want a powered USB hub and a separate Wi-Fi dongle in my opinion.

    • J

      New Project - Thoughts? (CentOS, HAProxy, Load Balance)...

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      56
      0 Votes
      56 Posts
      4k Views
      scottalanmillerS

      @Jimmy9008 said in New Project - Thoughts? (CentOS, HAProxy, Load Balance)...:

      In Windows, Remote Access/RDP etc is not enabled OOB. I assume the same in Linux? Unless you can connect to each through a command line/ssh or something, which maybe needs to be enabled/disabled etc...

      Linux has no default, it is the distros here that would have a default. CentOS defaults to SSH enabled. Most places leave it enabled. But certainly not all.

    • 1
    • 2
    • 347
    • 348
    • 349
    • 350
    • 351
    • 698
    • 699
    • 349 / 699