Blender can video edit.
https://danielpocock.com/quick-start-blender-video-editing

True: CAT6 is finicky and takes a lot more effort than CAT5e
False: You need to be certified.

Might just be Barracuda.

We use Webex here, not the best but it works. Definitely pricey, but we have it because that's what our customers are used to using, so.....

@gjacobse said in Korora 25 Daily Use:

@scottalanmiller said in Korora 25 Daily Use:

@gjacobse said in Korora 25 Daily Use:

@scottalanmiller said in Korora 25 Daily Use:

Use top and hit "m"

That I like.

Shows Firefox using about 15%MEM

How often are you restarting FF? On Korora I found that it could not be left on for more than one day.

The system as a whole has only been running 1:4:3:00 - I restarted FF this morning after @dafyre made mention of it.

I mentioned the other day that you needed to restart it regularly 😉

Please mention another reason for not using Docker with Linux based operating systems:
If the UID on your host system doesn’t match the UID of the user inside your Docker container, you will have file ownership issues.

I think most people don’t encounter this because they are probably the only user on their development machine, and most people only add a single user in their Dockerfile to run their app.

I’m not sure about other Linuxes, but Ubuntu will assign the first user a UID of 1000 so if you’re the first user on an Ubuntu host and you have an Ubuntu-based Docker image, you won’t even notice.

Personally, i was given advice to avoid host volumes even though the case can be resolved with bindfs and a privileged machine in a Windows environment.

Also have you tested your ping to to NJ/NY data center for VULTR? Might surprise you.

I was surprised and ended up moving some things from Chicago to NJ/NY despite it being twice the distance from me as Chicago VULTR instances were (500 miles to Chicago, 1200 miles to NJ/NY). Latency went from 80/90ms to 30ms or less on average when I moved to NJ/NY Vultr instance.

.

Pretty sure that ShadowCopy is still time only.

Veeam DOES recommended avoiding low end NAS devices, and recommends SAN over NAS because Veeam wants block protocols. These parts are true and we don't need to watch videos as they are available in writing from @Rick-Vanover - we even have the author of the best practices here in the community!

https://www.veeam.com/blog/vmware-backup-repository-configuration-best-practices.html

0_1501712220659_Screenshot from 2017-08-02 17-16-46.png

The keys here are "low end" which is an issue around support. The misleading bit is that NAS means server, so low end servers are every bit affected in the same ways. The QNAP, Synology, ReadyNAS and other such devices are not actually NAS but Unified Storage, SAN as much as NAS. That Veeam recommends SAN instead of NAS is a protocol choice, it does not make those devices any less applicable. We should not be calling them NAS, as that is misleading, they are equally both.

If we really look at the guidance and consider what it could mean, the only real concern is "low end" and low end is always of some concern. Why spend so much on Veeam and Windows licensing and then get cheap on the hardware? You want solid storage hardware and solid support. But nothing here is telling us that there is anything wrong at all with these kinds of devices and certainly the issue is not some kind of corruption caused by the fact that they are in this product category.

@jaredbusch said in Ubuntu Boot Issues:

@brrabill said in Ubuntu Boot Issues:

Gotta love Ubuntu.

not really.

FFS can't you tell that was sarcasm?

Hey ... I kind of like this FFS-ing and yelling at people! It's fun after a long day!

@jaredbusch said in My Grizzly Login...:

@bigbear said in My Grizzly Login...:

How do you like my Fusion login screen?

Has turned out to be very much a developer/freeswitch project. Just messing around with it has given me so many ideas...

0_1501689798181_Screenshot (41).png

That (FusionPBX/Freeswitch) is next on my list of things to do this week, after firmware updates to Ubiquiti gear.

You know, if nothing else you could use it to provision and configure your phones to your FreePBX instances. The provisioned is great.

Just be a little bit of code change...

It has been for a while. However, the rumour is that the product is done and being phased out. So not likely useful even for testing.

@jaredbusch said in Comparing Ubiquiti EdgeRouter and Cisco ASA PPS Performance and Cost:

@nashbrydges said in Comparing Ubiquiti EdgeRouter and Cisco ASA PPS Performance and Cost:

@jaredbusch said in Comparing Ubiquiti EdgeRouter and Cisco ASA PPS Performance and Cost:

@nashbrydges said in Comparing Ubiquiti EdgeRouter and Cisco ASA PPS Performance and Cost:

@brandon220 said in Comparing Ubiquiti EdgeRouter and Cisco ASA PPS Performance and Cost:

I've been using an ERL at home for a while and have them deployed at several business. Zero complaints and I recommend them all the time.

I wish I could use it at home. I'm on Bell Canada ftth and they use a different vlan for iptv and internet. All of the online guides I've seen haven't been able to get me to use my ERL and Bell won't give up which VLANs they use.

No one hasd figured this information out yet?

Sadly not yet, at least not that my Google-fu has allowed me to find.

I am a bit amazed because it should only take a mirrored switch port and wireshark to find VLAN tags.

This was my thinking as I was reading the posts. This is /should be pretty easy to figure out.

In thinking about this - I mentioned adding additional domains to the search suffix list.

While this is doable for a few PCs, or if you are using DHCP, I was thinking -

For the primary things you'll be searching for by shortname from the 'other' domains, create cname records in the local domains pointing to the real host in the real domain.

Example

The DB server is DB1.fire.randomcity.com
A user in water.randomcity.com needs to access the DB server.
Create a cname in the water.randomcity.com DNS server called DB1 that points to DB1.fire.randomcity.com
This allows the user in the water domain to connect to 'DB1' and they will be pointed to the server via DNS over to the server in the fire domain. No change to the client's DNS search suffix list required.

This does assume that there is not a server called DB1 in the water domain.

@bigbear said in So, is this Vultr Machine CPU Pegged Out?:

@Dashrender yeah I thought the same thing

Its a windows RDSH server btw. Made a huge difference. I went ahead and defrag (optimized) the block storage attachment as well for the hell of it.

Hmmm... Windows. Suspicious 😉

@jaredbusch No rush but when you can post something up that will help 🙂

@travisdh1 said in NextCloud: Insuffienct Storage:

Which base OS is being used? Debian/Ubuntu or RedHat/CentOS/Fedora? Log files will be different between the two that I'd want to look at. Either way probably looking for the apache/httpd log.

Fedora -

FWIW, xo-server updated to 5.11.1 without issue.