63410266-b777-4ebd-83be-e8b7bdaa4816-image.png

Full PDF of plan comparison
https://vitalpbx.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ENG_VitalPBX-Plans-Web.pdf

Oh look WP link. Lazy....

I have not dealt with this much, however I have seen sharing groups get their members removed completely.

jees @scottalanmiller can you please just start posting giant fucking walls of text so I can ignore everything you have to say.

Thanks much,

sarcastically

Dustin

@olivier Definitely worth repeating this old post. Oracle has given back so much more than Amazon.

@FiyaFly said in Github for code storage:

@scottalanmiller said in Github for code storage:

@FiyaFly said in Github for code storage:

I've been using Bitbucket for private repos, and I didn't run into any issues with them, but man I scoured a year ago trying to find the best alternatives because I didn't want to pay for Github. This is awesome.

Why not GitLab which has always been free, and is totally open source?

It was long enough ago that I would have to review my notes, but I think it had to do with data encryption, and at the time I saw BitBucket had a plugin for that.

If memory serves, that plugin actually didn't work, and I never had the time nor energy to go on another hunt. Was attempting to adhere to data encryption standards here at work because some of my stuff might have identifiable information in it.

Also a lot of things have changed since then, and even with this new advent, I'll still have to review where things stand with requirements, desires, and focus.

Currently I mostly use the private repo for my notes storage on my general tasks. Originally it was a factor of I was just getting into using Git for anything and wanted to ensure I had a backup of my notes somewhere. This was not something
my employer would participate in, and almost certainly my boss would have rejected my request for approval, mostly for arbitrary reasons. Since I certainly have 'sensitive' information in my notes, I wanted to ensure that I stayed properly aligned with any and all compliances that may have applied.

Since then... those aren't details to get into on a post, but suffice it to say I have the most care for those compliances in my department.

Cleaning up some spam posts and including this suggestion that was on the site but hidden in spam so that we won't miss the spam:

Get-ADComputer -Filter {OperatingSystem -Like “Windows 10*”} | ForEach-Object {Get-WmiObject -Class Win32_Process -Computer $_.Name}

This error came up while loading the page - not because the user clicked on something, or clicking on the lock in the address bar.

@FATeknollogee said in VOIP Provider: Skyetel:

@scottalanmiller curious question...why are you responding to a post from Dec of 2018 made by a user who only posted that one time?

Also, because @scottalanmiller .......

Issue was fixed. Enclosure back plane was bad. A new C7000 had to be purchased and swapped out and it worked right away.

Whoa I love this. Are you still using it @BRRABill ?

Dont' use bullet/number lists in instructions and guides like this. it makes it annoying for those that want to copy and paste.

This guide is assuming that you are running as root. If not prepend everything here with sudo.

Install the salt-master package dnf install salt-master Open the required ports in the firewall firewall-cmd --add-port=4505-4506/tcp --permanent firewall-cmd --reload Enable the salt-master service to start on boow, and also start it now. systemctl enable --now salt-master.service

@DustinB3403 said in Why IT Builds a House of Cards:

Just to necro this thread, how would someone in IT actually get the business to see and understand these risks? I've tried this, explained in full detail the chances taken and I get a "thank you for telling us, but let's stay the course" sorts of responses.

Thanks for the necro. Get greeted with a comment I didn't recall making, just to look at the date 2 1/2 years ago. lol.

Then, on a second note, this article legitimately applies to me today.

@JaredBusch Yes, you were correct and we discussed this last night on the Telegram group 🙂 .

@DustinB3403 said in Testing oVirt...:

Also I feel like the most popular instructions were a blog post, rather than official documentation.

I'm not even sure they have a dedicated techwriter. This is why it is better to just follow the official RHV docs. You'll have to filter out the Red Hat specific details, like subscription-manager, but you'll definitely have a better experience

All of the hypervisors are built for this. It's the storage and clustering that may or may not be built for this. As a rule, highest performance systems are not clustered at all, the can't be. Clustering takes a performance hit.

But in the extreme performance space products like VMware and Starwind are the top dogs. Both have multiple solutions, but they are using tech like memory sharing, localized data, NVMEoF, log structuring, and others to do things that Gluster just can't do. So much so that products like Gluster sometimes use these techs on top to accelerate them (example: Starwind makes a CEPH accelerator platform.)

Yes, if you are setting physical ports to a VLAN, then they are acting like a physically different switch on those ports. So attaching another physical switch to one of those ports would make it a switch on that VLAN.

@Dashrender said in PCI Point to Point vs End to End:

@scottalanmiller said in PCI Point to Point vs End to End:

@Dashrender said in PCI Point to Point vs End to End:

@Pete-S said in PCI Point to Point vs End to End:

@Dashrender said in PCI Point to Point vs End to End:

@Pete-S said in PCI Point to Point vs End to End:

@Dashrender said in PCI Point to Point vs End to End:

@Pete-S said in PCI Point to Point vs End to End:

If you have unencrypted LAN communication (at your servers) you are encrypted point-to-point but not end-to-end.

Thanks, I get the difference now... but now why anyone cares.

It's just that CC info can't be picked up anywhere if it's end to end encryption.

but it can - at the terminal where it's collected - at the processor who terminates the E2EE (though hopefully that's beyond extremely unlikely).

Maybe I should have said it can't be picked up in transit.

The card processors probably have more stringent requirements for infosec than PCI.

Sure, ok - in transit... but once the data gets to your payment gateway, it's not your responsibility anymore - so again, who cares... P2PE gets it to the payment gateway just as good as E2EE does to First Data or Elavon, only the payment gateway then also injects itself into the data stream for some unknown reason...

So I'm still not seeing a benefit to E2EE to the merchant.

I assume E2EE gives you some discounts.

based on what?

Just seems like the logical reason.

Placeholder