@garak0410 said:

@thanksaj said:

@garak0410 said:

@thanksaj said:

@garak0410 said:

@thanksaj said:

Is it always the same document that has the issue? Same font?

Happens to all paper sizes...all drivers and OSes (Windows 7 and 8.1)...even the built in paper path test and configuration pages...

Then that basically rules out software issues. Given the situation, there may be something wrong with the fuser, transfer roller, or a couple other components. I'd say it's time to replace the unit, unless you want to spend a small fortune getting an HP technician to look at it and only possibly fix it.

I am thinking it may be the transfer roller...I looked at it again and a plastic gear piece was sitting inside of it...didn't immediately see where it went but I have one on order just to see...would be amazing if that was the only problem.

Another common maintenance item on high volume printers.

I think it may have broke when I replaced it about 3-4 weeks ago, which is when this problem happened. But didn't equate it with that...ugggh.

Well hopefully this fixes it!

@Minion-Queen said:

It's weird cause nothing seems to be consistent. Some of us say Safari is fine other say chrome. Others can't use either.

Important question is... Chrome on what? Chrome on iPhone is still Safari under the hood. Chrome elsewhere is not.

@Reid-Cooper said:

That is a very strange business name. No wonder no one figured out what it was.

haha ehh I don't know Sir, that's why i asked..
Now i know 😉

I have seen the same thing. Often VoIP reliability simply outperforms traditional phone types. VoIP gets so much more modern infrastructure and has so much more resiliency, mostly in the ability for the end users (customers) to enact their own redundancy strategies whereas traditional phone types required complete dependence on a single vendor to supply all reliability and if they failed to do so there was little recourse leaving little incentive for them to do a good job.

@scottalanmiller said:

@thanksaj said:

@scottalanmiller not the point I was making.

Just saying that it could be super easy with effectively zero effort.

Yeah, I know. A bookmark in Chrome works just as well. Lol

So weird, you click on Not Junk and it asks if you always trust. Bah...that doesn't work.

Reading can be informational!

I have also manually added email addresses to Safe Senders in Oulook's Junk E-mail options.

FF 33 and haven't encountered any problem so far 🙂

Hmm...

Oh well.. I might just stick an MS OS back on an old PE box and use NTbackup.. It's simple,.. but doable.

@technobabble said:

@thanksaj said:

What PC are they connecting to, and are the credentials stored in the browser on that computer somehow? I'm confused how having them remote into a specific PC to do this when they likely need to know the credentials anyways adds any value.

This would be a one time log in and no, the password is not saved.

Ok, so how does having them use a separate PC make anything more secure? Unless they are using personal machines for work...

@Reid-Cooper said:

Maybe Webroot should have a tweet for everytime that it is blocked!

I like it!

Interface is everything isn't it? What's so great about the backend?

One of these days I'll finally get organised with my photos. Maybe....One day......

Yes, VM snapshots. Pain.

@Minion-Queen said:

I have heard that both of these are really good.

Brother MFC-J6720DW $225 on amazon

Set this bad boy up yesterday along HP Pro series desktop. It was nice to see that the product is a Professional Series Inkjet. Much bigger than our previous Brother consumer printers, this one is close to the specs of the 2 we bought.

Thanks for the recommendations!

Also, @PSX_Defector , this is my test box. They let you pick whatever OS you want to run on here and run it, be it Windows or any flavor of Linux. They don't put any blocks on it. I just use Google for DNS because it's faster and more stable as a rule.

@FiyaFly said:

Well, they send the notification as though they are getting a channel unavailable response from the PBX. I'm looking to call them tomorrow but wanted to see if anyone had seen this before. I do not think it is the PBX either.

Everything about this screams "hiccup in Vitelity" but of course, they'll pass it off as a PBX problem unless you can prove definitively otherwise.

This actually has been discussed quite a bit in forums over the last few weeks. And the bug, expanding the virtual disk and CBT affects more than embedded systems. Started, I think, on Reddit, then discussed by Veeam, noticed on The Register, and brought over to SW.

@NetworkNerd said:

So do you direct your users to the site where the RemoteApp gets published to use to connect to it, or do you put a shortcut on their desktops for the RemoteApp as well? I'm assuming there is no difference in functionality but don't really know at this point.

I push a shortcut. You cannot trust users to find anything via direction.