@FiyaFly Well, it inconsistent is how it was behaving. 🙂
Fair point. Fair point indeed. lol. I will admit, I have a rule of thumb with inconsistent problems. If it's on a computer, first assumption is hardware.
For something like this, first assumption is Firewall, and more specifically NAT.
Now I didn't need to use a separate ISP for the Guest network, I could have setup VLAN trunking on the corporate firewall connection, and then setup rules inside the corporate firewall to split the traffic as desired.
I'm sure I've used something like Acronis Backup and Restore in the past for trouble machines, when restore they have a "dissimilar hardware" option.
Right - I was using the tools I had available at the time. XenConvert hasn't been officially supported since VS 6.2 or earlier.
I did solve the problem though - one that seemed pretty common - though as @hobbit666 mentioned - third party utilities apparently do often help resolve these problems sometimes.
OpenVas is a great tool, but the GUI is one of the worst I have seen.
Ya. What's with the lady in the scan area? The reports are also not great.
Yeah she really annoys me. She has to be the most annoying thing about the GUI. The reports have good information but the format isn't great. They aren't well organized and they don't have pretty images.
Haha yes! I never looked into it but they look like LaTeX documents, so I can understand why they did it that way.
I tested with internet radio and it plays for hours without interruption, but with itunes library it struggle to keep up.
What a POS (the macbook/itunes part)! My music library will play uninterrupted across the whole house from a big, slow SATA drive.
Did you use NAS option?
On the speaker? I don't think mine has that option, might be a gen 1 model. On mine, you just point it to a network share.
On Bose's app. There are 2 primary options. 1st is internet radio. 2nd is add a server. In Add a service there are options to add Amazon Music, Spotify, Pandora, etc... and connect to NAS and Using iTunes Library.
Yeah, I guess that's the option I used. I didn't remember it being called "NAS" though, but my memory sucks sometimes. I think my brain translates that to "network folder".
So the way ADFS works (here) is that when a client attempts to access say, email, they hit microsoft, which forwards the request to our exchange server to confirm the user details, and then our server redirects the request back to microsoft to access email.
This is a long handshake. Just have autodiscover setup and configured that Microsoft is syncing our details from exchange, and allowing people to authenticate against what microsoft has for email is way "cleaner".
And way less of a headache (like the past 4 days)
I suppose I see what you're saying AD sync can give you this. So what other features of ADFS is @coliver getting that AD sync doesn't provide?
I honestly have no clue what features are included. I haven't done anything (besides the work over these past 4 days) to try and find what was broke.
What you are thinking of is my recommendation for supported drives that are part of the system itself if you are going for a warranty supported system like from Dell or HPE. Bringing your own drives would push you to vendors like SuperMicro where you can mix and match for the best performance, cost and features.
I want to ask why we can't/shouldn't use consumer class drives in a Dell or HPE server, but I think the answer might be - because if you're paying for that level of support, why are you not going all in?
Is that right?
i.e. if you want to run your own performance/cost factors, you're better off starting with a SuperMicro, is that what you're saying?
I find a good yum clean all tends to fix these types of errors.
Yep. I mostly just wanted to point out that even the OS myself and @scottalanmiller are always recommending can do dumb things from time to time as well.
If you had another station (whether laptop or desktop) or maybe a very small VM on what will be your host, consider installing Starwind's virtual SAN (just on the one box). It's a way to get yourself some experience with how VMware or another hypervisor interacts with iSCSI storage. I've used it in a lab before, and it worked great.
We have that on top of the Scale cluster in the lab. Starwind SAN on top of the HC3 works great.
