@NetworkNerd yes, you can just redirect them!

https://techlib.barracuda.com/display/bwfv60/block+messages

@technobabble said:

@JaredBusch Thanks for the info, that helped.

I am guessing it really doesn't matter (custom domain vs no-ip domain) as long as they can connect to the cameras.

Going to get them setup asap.

The good thing about using your own domain record is if you move it somehow you can keep the same url for end users and they won't notice any changes.

Yes, you can move the drive.

that will cut their virus exposure way down though!

For those same reasons you can't lock down a Domain Admin account.

Solving the problem so you can use a non domain admin account is the only way to really lock it down.

Obviously that is where they got the name from.

@Dashrender since the vendor should have little to no way to identify an OS installation as being virtual or physical, it works out well. Don't ask, don't tell.

@thecreativeone91 said:

I had a Nokia Lumia 920.. It took great pictures that was about it. It was nice that it was streamlined. The browsers was lacking (only allowed 4-5 tabs) MS did not allow third-party browsers to be made. The apps are lack and most of them are just html wrappers (so an app the loaded the IE frameworks and made it 'hidden' to the user.

The browser now has unlimited tabs (at least I've seen mine have as many as 12.)...apps are getting better but they still do seem like the distant cousins of the other apps.

I'll hold on to my ICON as long as I can...fingers crossed they will get another flagship...the HTC One M8's camera is what would keep me from it.

Without an open conversation, it is effectively impossible for EE to have value anywhere near as good as open forums.

@thecreativeone91 said:

@ajstringham said:

@thecreativeone91 said:

I still like Trendmicro as much as some people hate them. I had more problems when I tried webroot than I ever did with full deployments of Trendmicro.

When did you last try Webroot?

Like less than a month ago.

Weird...

@thecreativeone91 said:

Ah, That's why you didn't need .htaccess because it was doing that inside the main config..

Yes, so now I just need to look into general security settings and such.

@thecreativeone91 said:

There is never such a thing as true security with anything online. Its just logging and more levels to break through. nothing isn't breakable.

Even offline. There is no security. I'll take online security over offline security any day.

@Jaguar said:

I wholly agree with the SSDs for databases, and really, anything that has a high amount of 'touches' (otherwise known as IOPS!). Databases constantly have little tiny touches to make changes, which results in a higher amount of requests going on to the storage. This is where higher IOPS makes the difference. For systems like your average desktop, moving a large file takes relatively few IOPS, but more throughput.

These large number of small touches is why huge RAM both in the system and in cache make such a big different to databases. With a good RAID cache you can offload a ton of write hits and speed the system while also preserving the SSDs. And a large system memory will do even more often keeping transactions from hitting the storage subsystem completely.

I use Notepad++ quite a lot too.

Yup, pretty normal. Postgres is the database. Hashing never stops, baby.

Unitrends is constantly preparing itself for need to do an autosynth, and is working on the dedup and inline hashing and everything else all the time. It's pretty normal for postsgres to be pegged.

I need to spend some time going over the exchange 2013 books myself, I've deployed countless exchanges up through 2010, but 2013 just seems to have endemic issues, like sharepoint. You've got to dig in and change things before it'll even begin to work properly.
On a fresh exchange 2013 install, I couldn't even get the EAC to come up until I'd installed the service packs, all I was getting was "Something went wrong, sorry :-(", no messages to help along the way.

I liked the old exchange console :<

@garak0410

No, the 302 redirect is on the website/hosting from the old website. The redirect you are using is only for the home page also, which is why this page is still working: http://pinnaclemetalbuildings.com/contact.html

My company can help you guys with this type of issue as websites, graphic design and marketing is 60% of our workload.

It's weird because sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. I haven't seen a pattern yet.

This is one script we did when me and James used to work together at the town. It was mainly to make sure users where restarting to get updates from WSUS as well as new GPOs that needed restarts. We were tempted to take the okay button away after 14 days and make it only a Restart now but that got shot down of course.

http://community.spiceworks.com/scripts/show/1478-uptime-notification