I ran that with my domain admin account. If i use an account that is [email protected], I get the following (that account was used for a long time, and has the highest network credentials by far):

Additional Details

Exception details:
Message: Invalid Uri: parsing problem (no viable alternative): <
Parameter name: value
Type: System.ArgumentException
Stack trace:

Server stack trace:
at Microsoft.Rtc.Signaling.SipUriParser..ctor(String value)
at Microsoft.Rtc.Signaling.RealTimeAddress..ctor(String uri)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Lync.TestOcsCore.DoMRASServiceRequest()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Lync.TestOcsCore.Initialize()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Lync.OcsSignInTest.PerformTestReally()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Tests.Test.PerformTest()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Tests.Test.PerformChildren()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Tests.Test.PerformTest()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Tests.TopLevelTest.PerformTest()
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.StackBuilderSink._PrivateProcessMessage(IntPtr md, Object[] args, Object server, Object[]& outArgs)
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.StackBuilderSink.AsyncProcessMessage(IMessage msg, IMessageSink replySink)

Exception rethrown at [0]:
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.EndInvokeHelper(Message reqMsg, Boolean bProxyCase)
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RemotingProxy.Invoke(Object NotUsed, MessageData& msgData)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Website.PerformTestAsyncDelegate.EndInvoke(IAsyncResult result)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Website.TestExecutionManager.<>c__DisplayClass8.<TestCompleted>b__6()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Common.IL.ILUtil.DoTryFilterCatch(Action tryDelegate, Func2 filterDelegate, Action1 catchDelegate)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Website.TestExecutionManager.TestCompleted(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
Exception details:
Message: Invalid Uri: parsing problem (no viable alternative): <
Type: Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.Sip.SipException
Stack trace:
at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.Sip.SipUri.ParseUriString()
at Microsoft.Rtc.Signaling.SipUriParser..ctor(String value)

LVM clearly dictates.....

@JaredBusch said:

@travisdh1 said:

@Dashrender said:

why can't you put it in the room where you are using it?

1 AP and 8 rooms, and adding more APs would most likely create to much overlap. I actually have 2 on the way, but only anticipate needing one in that building. The 2nd one will be in a different building, and much simpler to deal with.

If you have lots of walls, then put two on opposite ends of the building and set the power to low.

This is why we test! While I think one will be enough, I ordered 2. The location for the 2nd one can easily be covered by the current cheapo running DD-WRT. I have a Friday of a long network cord on the floor while I walk around starring at WiFiAnalyzer on the company tablet.

You should point out that XenServer is almost exclusively for quite small companies, not large ones. XenServer goes after the SMB market primarily. It is Xen without XenServer that tends to go after the big enterprise customers. Both play in both markets, but XS really is focused on SMB and Xen sans XS on the enormous cloud market.

But as such, those big clouds are used by nearly every up to date SMB. So almost everyone is running something on Xen even if they do not realize it. Xen is just about everywhere.

@Dashrender said:

Do you think this will lead to an even higher infection rate than before?

Yes, because it now does not even take any coding knowledge. The crypto is created for you. All the person now has to do is find a delivery mechanism.

@Mike-Davis said:

femtocell

If you are trying to provide coverage for the customers, and only have one device - you risk 'losing' those customers since one carrier gets preferential treatment.

@anonymous said:

@Mike-Davis Your confusing two different services both offered by Backblaze.

Backblaze Business is a backup service like CrashPlan Business. $50 year for unlimited data, but it's designed for workstations not servers. This service is NOT in beta.

The service I was discussing was their B2 Cloud Storage service which is like Amazon S3. It just raw storage, you need something like the Cloudberry software to do the backup, and B2 would storage the data.

Does this make since?

P.S. I didn't realize B2 Cloud Storage was still in beta, would be better to hold off using it in production for now.

I thought in the other thread they had said it was out of Beta now.

@JaredBusch said:

@Dashrender said:

@JaredBusch said:

@Dashrender said:

@PSX_Defector said:

@JaredBusch said:

@NetworkNerd said:

They did provide specifics. They said open UDP 1024 - 65535 for RTP traffic specifically but UDP 5060 for SIP.

No, stating 1024-65535 is NOT specifics. It is a cop out.

At that point, why not just completely make it unsecured and put in an any/any rule.

I would silo that shit pronto, so when the inevitable pwnage happens it doesn't infect the rest of the network.

If it's limited only to the IP of the SIP provider, what are you worried about? Don't get me wrong, we should of course limit the ports when possible, but really 1 port versus 64K ports - does it make you more vulnerable when you've locked the ports to a single incoming IP?

My response to that is how can I trust them to keep their stuff secure when they cannot even configure a proper set of ports for RTP?

You have a completely valid point.

Setting that aside - does the rest of my point remain valid?

Yes, as long as you have properly restricted it to the provider, you have less to worry about.

I've restricted SIP and RTP traffic to the Intelepeer ips as @Dashrender mentions.

This is the important bit

function getSiteStatus (url) { var siteStatus = -1; try { var response = UrlFetchApp.fetch(url, { muteHttpExceptions: true, validateHttpsCertificates: false, followRedirects: true }); siteStatus = response.getResponseCode() === 200 ? 200 : -1; } catch(e) {} return siteStatus; }

So upon further investigation I've realized I'm a complete moron. So I created the local storage through the web interface. I thought that meant it was local to XenServer, but it was local to XO. So the backups are being saved to the container and not on XenServer. Disregard everything above, I'm just stupid.

@johnhooks said:

Ya I've tried to install with the gui and it wouldn't run unless I had it at least 1 GB. After the install I just put it at 256MB

This is what I should have done.....

or This: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eplStIEmtlA

I don't know about sending a window to another screen, but the 1/2 was definitely in Windows 7. That quadrant thing does sound usable, assuming your on a larger 4K type display.

@scottalanmiller said:

wn all of the

I lease with buyout from HP and use un-managed colo. An aged asset becomes a liability for my business continuity. However I dont think I would lease equipment from Rackspace fwiw. My aged hardware becomes dev hardware upon replacement.

thx
-d

Guess I will cross-post on SW.

http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1368875-vcenter-server-6-on-windows-2012-r2-backup-using-veeam-8

@creayt said:

@JaredBusch said:

usively devs via GotoMyPC. I cannot stand to watch him work. So there is your exception to prove the point.

That guy sounds like he hates productivity. I can't imagine what that would be like. Cringing as I write this.

He has changed his GoToMyPC settings to never disconnect and the session is up for days at a time.

https://eshop.macsales.com/shop/Thunderbolt/Dock/OWC/Thunderbolt2-Dock/ - I don't know how "universal" it is, you'd need thunderbolt in PC
http://www.amazon.com/Kensington-Sd3500v-Universal-2048x1152-ethernet/dp/B009F7E730 - no audio 😞

Social Media is king these days. I only spent about $50 in advertising for this traffic. Using Facebook Groups to promote our site has been highly effective. I have also gained more blog authors due to the amount of exposure.

0_1451501672988_2015-12-30_13-53-24.jpg

We don't do tech screenings with questions like this. We interview using conversations. I find the entire idea of having a list of technical question or non-technical weird questions (what kind of bird would you be) to be a waste of time and actively counter-productive. They tell you effectively nothing about the abilities of a useful candidate. Discussions are much more telling and much harder to fake or prepare for while not weeding people out at random based on testing .0001% of their potential knowledge without knowing if it is something that they should know about. Also far less likely that the interviewer is the one that is wrong - which I've seen be the case as often as not sitting on both sides of the table. Interviewers rarely research their questions and this makes it that much worse that you might weed out people based on knowing too much!