Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
Pretty sure that ShadowCopy is still time only.
J
@JaredBusch said in CryptXXX ransomware:
@scottalanmiller said in CryptXXX ransomware: Every time one of these gets broken, it massively lowers the value of making the next one, too. I see it differently. Every time one of these gets broken, it highlights how easily the governmental agencies can get into our personal data.
@scottalanmiller said in CryptXXX ransomware:
Every time one of these gets broken, it massively lowers the value of making the next one, too.
I see it differently.
Every time one of these gets broken, it highlights how easily the governmental agencies can get into our personal data.
Who said its not the government (NSA) releasing these ransoms ware viruses?
@scottalanmiller said:
FUD
I'm sad to say I had to look this up, and it wasn't nearly what I thought it would be.
@Dashrender said:
Do you think this will lead to an even higher infection rate than before?
Yes, because it now does not even take any coding knowledge. The crypto is created for you. All the person now has to do is find a delivery mechanism.
No one has replied
Where DNS != DNS That was CONFUSING
Where DNS != DNS
That was CONFUSING
I knew exactly what @scottalanmiller issue was when I read his post.. I updated my post for clarity.
http://mangolassi.it/topic/6748/do-we-still-need-file-protocols-today
