Do other machines have the issue when they try to hook up at the same location?

I'm not sure that I understand the question.

@BRRABill said:

And with a product like DropBox Busniess I can collaborate by SHARING, but not working on the document at the same time.

Right, which is a bit different.

Yeah, it's limited nearly to pointless.

@scottalanmiller said:

That's not an uncommon approach.

That is exactly why we use it. We use the Action Pack for application builders.

Going to do so now, thanks.

@scottalanmiller said:

@JaredBusch said:

Yeah, wget and epel-release are NOT part of a true clean CentOS install. Many people just make instructions with assumptions built in.

I did not in this case. I knew that epel was required but not included and put it in the instructions. Wget I tested to ensure it was there by default, but it appears that Digital Ocean is modifying that too!! That's really frustrating. Can't wait till our new lab cluster is up so that we can do these tests faster and easier there with true vanilla installs and not have to trust third parties have not been modifying them.

Well, we had a discussion here (not even going to try and find the thread) about a year or so ago when I was setting something up and I mentioned this then. Mostly related to how DO was not a clean Minimal install.

I even got a $10.00 Gift Card for my efforts.

Who knew, I wasn't expecting anything.

That doesn't really surprise me that it's a bandwidth hog like that...

https://www.ninite.com/greenshot

Thanks, Ill have a look. I wonder if they are features I would be concerned over.

@scottalanmiller said:

There does not seem to be any trend with this issue. Just one user, in a quick search, reporting the issue. And there was no answer in that case.

FWIW, I've found some additional instances of this issue by searching Google with "HKCU\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\PushNotifications\AppDB"

@johnhooks said:

@scottalanmiller said:

@johnhooks yup, every script that is trying to hit you already checks for the ports to be open, not specific ones. Someone attacking you would never even realize you had changed the port unless they are specifically getting a report of people who had done so, presumably because that would mean that they are better targets to focus on.

Plus if nothing else, it's annoying to remember.

Which alone is considered a bad security practice.

@scottalanmiller said:

You are too fast for us 🙂

I had a meeting at 3pm EST with the vendor on the assumption I was going to have the issue fixed by then. Now I can go get some coffee.

@DustinB3403 said:

So just buggy ass software, and the device is useless then?

You could try hacking it for a weekend project. It's got all the right bits to be an interesting toy.

@xByteSean said:

@BRRABill Yes as a matter of fact we do. Any proof of concept box can be configured and shipped to you, and if it didn't fit your needs we would provide the return shipping label at no cost to you.

That is very awesome!

@gjacobse said:

I think you have the Ftype and Assoc backwards.

http://superuser.com/questions/204354/how-do-i-get-ftype-assoc-to-match-windows-explorer

Not unless Microsoft is wrong about there own commands.

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb490912.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/323526