For switch, the following is the configuration, I mean it is on SNMP.
sw2 2.PNG
Following is info that I can see for it:
sw2 3.PNG
Is it possible to pull info every port of switch, just like Spiceworks Networ Monitor used to do? If yes, what template I would need to use or any config? Most switches we have are Cisco SG300.
swn.PNG
Yes, Cisco and general SNMP templates can be applied to the host and it will start to pull in information if you configured SNMP correctly.
Makes no sense developing on a laptop IMHO - unless you're talking about another kind of R&D in another field.
On our team we remote into development servers and all development and testing is run there. Which means the computer you're actually sitting in front of just needs to be able to run a browser, rdp, ssh etc. So any machine suitable for general office work would get the job done. So no 2-3K laptops needed for development, even if that is not the primary reason. I kind of assumed everyone worked that way but haven't actually given it much thought until now.
I haven't really seen anyone do this other than CAD work. Everywhere I've been it's local development, possibly using Eclipse Che or Coder or something for a remote IDE but still local.
VSCode and JetBrains tools allow you to include your development environment in a container. So when you open the project it will open inside of a container with all of the dependencies included. That's the best workflow ive seen so far.
I believe you and find it very interesting. Wov. If that's how most people work, I'm just blown away. I assumed everyone was remote and had full on development and test environments at their disposal.
They usually do have full dev/test environments but it's all containerized. So it's trivial to run that locally. Then when you are satisfied with local results push to your branch and have it auto build/deploy against the actual dev/test environments with something like Flux/Argo. This is still remote, GitOps is all about remote workflows.
Hey guys sorry for late update....
I still didn't fix my issue....like I say before I am not a PRO so I really need a step by step help if someone has time.
The main issue is that the two site can't ping each other but I can from the laptop and access to both network LAN clients.
I tried to create a new GATEWAY and select the Zerotier interface + made a static rule but is not working.
@Dashrender I'm a 3rd party to the end customer here. Acting as the middle man as the customer's IT department wanted to engage outside support to try and vet different products.
I candidly told the customer that while this product will work, it won't work with all of the features they want without some substantial changes to their infrastructure and that the support (at least from this vendor) is pretty awful.
The simple approach here is to not integrate RFID/HID's to the system and simply use the AD Integration with the built-in QR codes that each member is assigned.
Just because something may be supported, doesn't imply that it is support.
Except in this case the vendor very clearly has stated they support you adding custom attributes within AD.
And yes I know that best is relative to ones needs.
Access was the "best" at one point I'm sure.
I'm willing to bet that's not true - not a lot.. maybe $100... lol pretty sure Access was never the best for anything.. other solutions while possibly more difficult could still likely be shown to be much better solutions.
It wasn't Access itself that was the thing. It was the JET database engine that Access used under the hood that made it popular.
Back in the 90's if you wanted a simple database in your application and you used something like Visual Basic 3.0 then the JET engine was the first option to consider because Microsoft bundled it with VB and it was free. That's how it gained a foothold.
The JET engine was very very far from the best or even good. It was common to corrupt the database and run tools to "repair" it. But it was available without any effort - today we know that is perhaps the most important "feature"...
If you wanted the best you'd connect your application to an Oracle db.
MS Access itself was never a serious tool that developers used for business applications. It's very limited so VB was the default choice in the MS ecosystem for these kinds of applications.
Once Access could use SQL Server, it became worlds better. But the whole "GUI application interface" made it so expensive and limiting that it could never really be a great tool, even when it was a good enough tool.
I've got customers who have built way too much on it and even though they are tiny and use it about as well as anyone could, it's really clear that if they put a little effort into a PHP developer that they could replace everything in a week with something vastly better.
A week? you mean 40 hours at $250/hr (dev house)?
40 hours, a PHP dev sure isn't $250/hr. That's an ERP cost per hour. Contract a developer for a week and you can definitely find someone who will work at much more like $85/hr if you shop around and find someone available.
I moved a test AP to 4.3.28.11361 yesterday. No issues experienced. I moved some additional ones this AM, and still no issue with DHCP like with the 4.3.24.x version
For the remote system, is it always creating new files? If so, you could set your script to delete files older than so many days and then run the SFTP?
Of course, the copy of the content is generated with robocopy incrementally, the whole environment is a Windows, except the SFTP which is a Linux, so in theory I could not make incremental copies to the sftp 😞
@Danp Hey Dan, I don't think it's on the xcp-ng forum but I had come across something on the XO forum about it. Don't have the post nearby but it's a known issue.
Open "RD Licensing manager", browse for device who's license you want to "revoke", leftclick on it and choose "Revoke license"
As said, up to 20% of total licenses can be revoked before expiry.
I checked few power supplies in office pcs, every single one accepts 100-240VAC 50-60Hz input. So they will work anywhere. I haven't seen one in years that would be limited to 110 or 230 (or others) only.