@DustinB3403 said in Trying to get metrics comparing two APs Cisco and Ubiquiti:

@Dashrender said in Trying to get metrics comparing two APs Cisco and Ubiquiti:

ustomer wouldn't approve adding cabling to run extra APs.

How many do they have today?

That's kind of what I'm thinking of recommending, but would want to ensure that we're list apples to apples and not against grapefuites (if you get my point).

well sure - so look at what the current APs support, then find something that does that or better for the new APs, You might have to play with power settings to keep things from overlapping to much,...

Tweaked a bit to provide an output file.

https://gitlab.com/EddieJennings/bash-general/-/blob/master/find_files_sort_by_filename.sh

@DustinB3403 said in Powershell variable help:

@Pete-S That is going to be complete subjective based on the type of spam that might come in.

I follow what you're saying but I'm kind of stuck between having something functional or not (due to this).

Well, you need to decide what you are allowing and not. For instance you have already decided to just use the subject line and not any of the other parts of the email, for instance author.

You need to run the string through regex or something like that to remove characters you are not allowing. It might take more than one string operation to sanitize. I think you can escape any special character you want to allow with backtick `.

Another option would be to allow the user to enter the entire KQL query themselves.

Also if you get an error when trying to apply the search you put out an error "Invalid search input!" and go back to prompt the user for input again. That would be one way so solve problems.

But, like I said, if you are moving everything, you can simply backup and restore, and then update DNS.

@scottalanmiller said in Proxmox install for use with a ceph cluster:

Yes, but it blocks SMART so you never want to do it, it undermines the stability of the JBOD. There's always a standard controller on the MOBO for the JBOD connections.

Also blocks TRIM commands (not that I trust the Linux TRIM driver to ATA drives given how many one off exceptions to disable they've had to write).
Operationally it's messy because on a drive failure you have to go in with PERCLI etc, and rebuild the RAID 0s. We used to run this but it was just a royal pain in the ass.

@manxam said in Ubiquiti WiFi blank the yard:

@DustinB3403 said in Ubiquiti WiFi blank the yard:

@manxam I didn't even know this was a thing! That's awesome.

How did you make out using Link? I haven't used it for a short PtP but have used its suggestions for several KM links.

I mean the distances are so short that the tool doesn't make a lot of sense, but it proves what I thought.

@JaredBusch said in Unifi Point to Point:

@NashBrydges said in Unifi Point to Point:

UBNT has also recently released a Unifi based option. Haven't tried those though.
https://store.ui.com/collections/unifi-network-routing-switching/products/unifi-building-to-building-bridge

Yes, These are a great solution that fill a very comman gap IMO.

So many building to building links are done with products that were designed for much longer ranges, simply because there was never a solution designed for the smaller ranges.

So those look interesting for sure and could be an option.

I got to see the site and there are quite a few trees between the buildings so this may not work.

It might be better fore to just blanket the area from a single focal point.

@G-I-Jones said in GPO to create scheduled task to run netlogon batch script:

Did you ever figure this out?

No and the person who was working on it has been OOO all day, so its not a priority either.

@Dashrender said in Unifi Controller - Reinstall and adopt APs:

@DustinB3403 said in Unifi Controller - Reinstall and adopt APs:

@travisdh1 Yeah I'm thinking what happened is someone setup a Unifi Controller on windows at some point, then they engaged us and said yeah we don't have access to the AP's but its all still working. So they were sold a physical cloud key, and still the AP's weren't adopted.

Assuming you're at an MSP now, do you host a controller that you could just build a new site for and adopt the APs too?

This is what @Bundy-Associates and @NTG do.

That is the plan, but for now this is just janitorial work.

I just confirmed, this system is only using the Intel controller, and not SS.

Checkout https://www.nomachine.com/
https://www.nomachine.com/terminal-server

https://github.com/UPC/ravada

@DustinB3403 : Team effort! 🙂

@DustinB3403 If it is not DNS, firewall is always a problem lol. Nice find.

All good points.... I've been sitting alone with my thoughts for too long, good thing it's Friday.... Just an hour left

@dafyre Thanks, testing now to see if it works (as expected).

@JaredBusch said in Vyos Configure DHCP Server:

@EddieJennings his second error is related to DNS.

This is a working DNS setup.

set service dns forwarding cache-size 150 set service dns forwarding listen-on eth7 set service dns forwarding listen-on eth7.2 set service dns forwarding name-server 1.1.1.1 set service dns forwarding name-server 8.8.8.8 set service dns forwarding options server=/domain.local/10.202.0.21 set service dns forwarding options server=/domain/10.202.0.21

Correct. I gambled from his title the immediate interest was DHCP. I lost. 🙂

@Dashrender said in Windows Domain routing question - dual-nic:

Though - if you have a second layer network like this, you'll need to inform your external router on the internal networks and how to route them.

Routing to the internet is mostly just a nice to have.

You could probably take away Major Project section and make that a bullet point under a role.

Also I like to list my skills under each role. It's any easy place to list your skills without using bulletpoints

1c1080b6-fce3-4816-a612-aa7dd84118ca-image.png

Got it with this.

lpadmin -p Printer-Name -E -v ipp://printer-address -o printer-is-shared=false -o printer-make-and-model="Canon iPR Svr G250 V1.0 US" -P "/Library/Printers/PPDs/Contents/en.lproj/Canon iPR Svr G250 V1.0 US"

@Dashrender said in lpadmin Printer drivers are deprecated and will stop working in a future version of CUPS:

@DustinB3403 said in lpadmin Printer drivers are deprecated and will stop working in a future version of CUPS:

Keeping a system out of date on purpose for this though. . . ugh kill me now.

Better get used to it - it's exactly what those shops running old XP machines on million dollar printing presses had to do.

😧