@black3dynamite said in Unix Command line - Printer Details: @DustinB3403 said in Unix Command line - Printer Details: Here is the completed command. lpoptions -p <NAME> | grep -o "printer-make-and-model='Your Printer make and Model" That outputs the exact detail I needed! lpoptions -p SHCSL_209_ColorPrinter | sed -r "s/^.*(printer-make-and-model.*)'.*$/\1/g; s/'//g; s/printer-make-and-model=//g" This will remove all the unnecessary text, printer-make-and-model=, and the single quotes. Yeah I'm also able to just use lpoptions -p SHCSL_209_ColorPrinter | grep "'SHCSL_209_ColorPrinter'" and get what I need in a single line response.

Is there a reason that you are looking into Awk? Awk is a programming language that used to be popular for extension text processing in conjunction with BASH. But in the last decades, its use has fallen away and that is why you won't find examples of it. It's only used for very basic things now. Languages like Perl and Python supplanted it being easier to use, better known, more portable, and vastly more powerful. Awk is really a legacy tool today.

@DustinB3403 said in Tar gzip file compression calculation without decompressing the file: @Pete-S So the simplest way I can think to explain this would be like this. You have a network share which is relatively organized You create a compressed tarball of any folder on that share and then move that tarball to offsite storage. How would I realistically get a hash of that folder pre and post tar and compression and have it make sense? They aren't the same thing, even if they contain the same things. @Pete-S said in Tar gzip file compression calculation without decompressing the file: Is it safe to assume that the gzip file is correct when it is created? This is what I'm looking to verify I'm assuming that files are static during backup. If you first of all run md5deep on all files in the folder, you'll create a textfile that contains md5 (or sha256 or what you want) signatures on every file in the folder. Place it into the folder so it ends up inside the backup and you'll always have the ability to verify any uncompressed individual file. If you really want to verify your tar.gz file after it's created I think you have to decompress the files to a temporary folder, run md5deep on the files to compare them with the original file. What you really are testing is that the backup-compress-decompress-restore operation is lossless on every file. It should be by design, but if there is an unlikely bug somewhere it's technically possible that it might not be. If you use the gzip compression with tar, gzip has a CRC-32 checksum inside that can be used to verify the integrity of the gzip file. Or to be even more certain you can create an md5 signature of the entire gzip archive with md5sum or md5deep. Then you can always verify that the archive has not been corrupted. If you ever need to restore the files you can verify the integrity of the restored files with the md5 you created on the original files, before you did the backup.

@rhya said in alternative way to copy stuff with read access: I am using fedora 22. Fedora 31 is current. F22 is insanely ancient.

Placeholder

You almost had it. It should be... find /Volumes -not -name something

rpcbind services is not required for NFSv4 https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/8/html/deploying_different_types_of_servers/exporting-nfs-shares_deploying-different-types-of-servers

@DustinB3403 said in OSX Power Saving Settings: @black3dynamite said in OSX Power Saving Settings: Does that also prevent it from sleeping when the lid is closed? The lid closed is powernap

So with further testing, a restart is required if the user is using their system, otherwise they'll continue to get the notifications.

@dbeato said in lpadmin - remove printer with a space in the name: @DustinB3403 said in lpadmin - remove printer with a space in the name: Nevermind! lpadmin adds spaces as underscores! So with lpadmin -p I was able to find the list of printers. lpadmin -p Accounting_Printer And with lpadmin -x Accounting_Printer was able to remove the printer! Removed Accounting_Printer Good to know for central administration of Apple devices. What are you using right now? ARD and Unix cli

@scottalanmiller said in OSX Unix Using Brew to install software remotely: @DustinB3403 said in OSX Unix Using Brew to install software remotely: So I can just unpack the dmg file, and have an Copy job, copy the application to the Applications folder for any user. As my admin user account. All via Apple Remote Desktop. This works without issue. What I am trying to do is avoid having to locally download the app at all, unpack it and then have a Copy job to run. I'd like to streamline the process. That's what the script is doing already. Making your own "sudo friendly" script for your install might make sense. The issue is there is no way AFAIK without adding my local admin account to this group. Which is more work than it may be worth since the existing solution works but is annoying.

Traditionally TrueOS has been a good desktop.

I was pretty surprised to find that uuidgen was not available, not even available for install!

See the following for ideas as to how you can accomplish what you're seeking to do: https://macmule.com/2011/09/08/how-to-map-drives-printers-based-on-ad-group-membership-on-osx/

@black3dynamite said in Allowing Root Password Login via SSH to Dragonfly BSD: @scottalanmiller said in Allowing Root Password Login via SSH to Dragonfly BSD: Dragonfly is tough by default because unless you use something like Salt, you can't connect to it to get keys to it in the first place. You can curl keys to it, of course. But you need totally different processes than you would typically use with any other OS to get it set up. That means it's not even Ansible friendly. Pretty much agent-based tools like Puppet, Salt, etc... is the way to go. Yup, unless you have some way to push the Ansible key ahead of time, like in a curl. So back to the beginning there

@scottalanmiller said in Errors Installing SaltStack on NetBSD 7.1.1: Got it, it was a packaging versioning issue. I had accidentally set the verison to 8.0 when it was 7.1.1. I got a clean install and set the package version correctly and now it works fine. If you want to know how to set the version accurately automatically, try this that I just made... export PKG_PATH="http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/`uname -m`/`uname -r`/All/" That's exactly what I was thinking but didn't say anything. I wanted to see what you'd do.

@black3dynamite said in GhostBSD 11.1 Released with MATE and Xfce: @scottalanmiller said in GhostBSD 11.1 Released with MATE and Xfce: My Xfce download is underway. What's GhostBSD default desktop environment? MATE and Xfce. Those are the only two that they make.

The Linux world is complex enough for normal users. BSD just pushed them that much farther over the edge.

Hope they will keep the pace

Start with old Desktop with Virtualization extension, something that you can install OS and dont have to remove cause of free space or you need it for something else. Cause learning Linux or Centos or anything else needs environment, and virtualbox can work but it wont allow you play with KVM, and thats for me the big part of the fun. Also you need to keep learning that means its is process some day you will leave it 4-5 days dormat cause your stuck in an issue the other day bulb lights up mainly due to reading this site and you get back on it.

All of the RHEL/CentOS 7 stuff I've used has started at 1000. Identity Management sets users in a random range around 1,000,000,000.