I don't believe it has been out more than a few days. The ship date was far enough out that we think that we might be in the first week of shipments, perhaps.

I've never heard of the Posh. If you run Spiceworks Android App on it, is it Posh Spice?

That's an easy fix. As long as you have the foresight to have SSH enabled.

@g.jacobse said:

@ajstringham said:

I agree with what he said. I've never heard of it. I've already got Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, and that's just installed. I also have Box, Amazon and a couple others. I'm set. Lol

I agree; I have Google Drive, Dropbox, Box and another I can't remember, in the office I have Onedrive and another Dropbox... I also carry 6 different USB drives - although three of them were to replace the other three, and I've since plan to reduce even more with a multi-boot USB.

@scottalanmiller said:

The primary feature of Tresorit is client-side encryption. A nice feature, but not too big of a deal for SMB customers, I don't think.

https://tresorit.com/

Although the REALLY BIG feature is that all data is stored only in the EU, not in the US. That's a big feature that I am surprised that they don't advertise more clearly.

Uhm - yea,.. that would be a big issue to disclose.. the US market could easily be cut off if someone barked loud enough. While it was a "SPICEWORKS" promo.. think I too will be passing.

No I think it is meant as a huge plus. More protection for companies.

Glad it's fixed!

@scottalanmiller said:

FTC..

Lol

Oh, so no way to test email functionality directly?

@Dashrender said:

The NAT Traversal is the biggest thing to overcome for any of these types of products. It's most easily done by a middle man server, which of course has a cost.

Yeah, that's a huge pain.

Thanks guys, I missed the fact that this was a 'soft phone'

In my case I installed a new HP driver, which apparently (completely expectantly) must have updated a part of one of my other pre existing HP drivers - which is where I had this problem.

@g.jacobse said:

@scottalanmiller said:

@g.jacobse no phone is useful without a PBX. How are you functioning without a PBX today? Are you paying for a 1960s Key System from the phone company?

Uhm yea - about that,...We have a onsite Nortel NorStar system at the main office,.. but I'm pretty sure it is otherwise POTS.... as it 90% of all of our remote sites. It was this way when I started last year - but I fully plan to move us into the modern world...

Nortel made PBXs, long ago. That's just an old PBX.

POTS is the outside lines, doesn't refer to the inside ones. At a minimum that's almost certainly a digital (not IP) phone system. Pretty rough, though.

Oh good, that was an easy solution 🙂

@Dashrender said:

did you find the problem?

Nope. Didn't get much time to work on it though.

Have not seen this before.

Lots of good tools on that list. Thanks for the share!

But for $60 per year a business can tell the other person that it is their side failing to use standards because it has updated.

That was an easy one 🙂

@JaredBusch said:

@ajstringham I cannot help sorry, I just turned up 4 websites on my CentOS7 server. all working perfectly.

I figured out the issue. I had everything set up correctly. Turns out my NoIP settings were wrong. Once I fixed those (that is what actually fixed it), it all started working! @scottalanmiller helped out tremendously! Thanks all!

@Hubtech said:

@scottalanmiller said:

@Hubtech said:

this is for a $300 device, and a company that only has 7 tunnels (and won't hit 20 for a couple years).

Have you looked at the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite instead? Only $99 and I would expect it to handle way more than 20 IPsec tunnels.

I mentioned the edge router 8 up there. I've never messed with one so i was looking for hands on from somebody.

I have 10 (may be one more I lost track) of the Ubiquiti EdgeMax LITE (ERL) in production. I only use OpenVPN tunnels at the moment because they are easier to work with and I am not approaching the bandwidth limit of OpenVPN on the hardware (~10-14mbps encrypted). Not a single site I have an ERL installed at has a pipe that can push out more then 10mbps, so I will never have a problem with this for now. I do have one IPSEC tunnel up to a home user that I have not sent a new router yet and it has no issues either.

The ERL I have at my home office has a tunnel to every single one of the remote ERL at my clients and it never blinks.

Using IPSEC you can get throughput in the 100+mbps range with the ERL. The difference between IPSEC and OpenVPN is that the IPSEC encryption can be offloaded to hardware while the OpenVPN encryption all has to be done on the processor.