This has been resolved and is working as intended.

@quixoticjeremy said in Sodium Helpdesk: Username Using Email Address Cannot Login:

I have been able to create an account using an email as the user name and log in with it. Can you confirm this is now working @NashBrydges ?

Confirmed. I can log in with an email address as a username.

@quixoticjeremy said in Sodium Helpdesk: New Group Permissions Not Working:

From what I can tell this is now working as intended. Can you confirm @NashBrydges ?

Confirmed fixed.

@nashbrydges said in Sodium Helpdesk: Unable To Create Password In Chrome:

@sodium said in Sodium Helpdesk: Unable To Create Password In Chrome:

@quixoticjeremy said in Sodium Helpdesk: Unable To Create Password In Chrome:

Have found the issue and have pushed a release. Keeping an eye for when it hits production to verify that like in dev this will fix the issue.

Push to prod is done.

Confirmed. The fix allows me to create password in Chrome.

Glad to hear, I've moved one of your next bugs. I'll be keeping you posted as soon as I'm rolling it out and as to which one it is.

@nashbrydges Thanks for posting this nash, will have to try this with fail2ban.

If anyone is interested there is a nice bash script for getting Guacamole installed:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/guacamoleinstallscript/

@scottalanmiller said in Install Alfresco Community Edition On Ubuntu 17.04:

@stacksofplates said in Install Alfresco Community Edition On Ubuntu 17.04:

@scottalanmiller said in Install Alfresco Community Edition On Ubuntu 17.04:

@nashbrydges said in Install Alfresco Community Edition On Ubuntu 17.04:

@scottalanmiller Just testing it out for now but so far so good. I had a client ask me for a good document management solution that wouldn't break the bank and could be hosted locally so I immediately thought of this. I've given him access to see if this could work and from the sounds of his feedback, he might want it setup.

Cool, would be good to see some threads on it. Been so long since I've used it.

I use the hosted one. They gave you 10GB for free. Idk if they still do that or not.

I didn't even know that they did hosted.

Ya the free one didn't seem advertised much. I'll have to see if I can find a sign up link again.

Thanks @JaredBusch this will be a huge help! I'll give this a try later this evening when I'm back.

I've used mnx.io before. They're not bad.

0_1498760223289_Selection_009.png

I have received USPS and UPS ones lately. Normals would be totally fooled by them. 😞

@dafyre said in Transfer Large File To Host = GOOD Transfer Large File To VM File Server On Same Host = BAD:

@Tim_G said in Transfer Large File To Host = GOOD Transfer Large File To VM File Server On Same Host = BAD:

@dafyre said in Transfer Large File To Host = GOOD Transfer Large File To VM File Server On Same Host = BAD:

@Tim_G said in Transfer Large File To Host = GOOD Transfer Large File To VM File Server On Same Host = BAD:

@dafyre said in Transfer Large File To Host = GOOD Transfer Large File To VM File Server On Same Host = BAD:

@Tim_G said in Transfer Large File To Host = GOOD Transfer Large File To VM File Server On Same Host = BAD:

@NashBrydges said in Transfer Large File To Host = GOOD Transfer Large File To VM File Server On Same Host = BAD:

@JaredBusch said in Transfer Large File To Host = GOOD Transfer Large File To VM File Server On Same Host = BAD:

Disable-NetAdapterVMQ

Yeah I was aware of the VMQ issues so that was disabled.

Once the office had closed for the day and after an hour of toying with everything I could find, I decided to completely uninstall the network drivers and reinstall from scratch. Deleted the vswitch and recreated it. Also uninstalled network drivers from workstation and reinstalled. Rebooted everything including the switch and it looks like everything is back to normal...for now. Not sure why this changed anything since none of the settings have changed. Just bizarre.

Thanks for your help everyone.

You do not want to disable VMQ on 10Gb NICs. That's what it is meant for. The issue was that VMQ was being enabled by default for 1Gb adapters, and that was causing the problems.

You disable VMQ on anything that is Intel or Broadcomm period. Their drivers are seriously bugged for that. I've got 4 Server 2012 R2 bare metal machines with Intel and Broadcomm 10 gig NICs in them. Network performance absolutely sucks until I disable VMQ.

Up to date firmware on the NICs?

My experience has been the opposite, as well as my research on the subject.

VMQ on 10Gb NICs is fine, that's what it was designed for. VMQ on 1Gb NICs is not fine.

When I disable VMQ on a busy 10Gb NIC on a Hyper-V host, performance goes down.

Yepp. Firmware is up to date (did an update about 2 months ago, I think). The systems have been operational for a year or better.

It's all Cisco gear on the networking side. I've read the same thing that you have that says 10gig is fine to enable VMQ, but on Intel & Broadcomm NICs, it is not.

Those are the NICs I'm talking about, Intel & Broadcom. Maybe I just have un-effected models in all of the servers I've dealt with.

I hope so, lol. But if you start having problems with Intel or Broadcomm NICs, that' the first place I'd start.

I have. And it was always with old-firmware'd 1Gb broadcoms. Never 10Gb.

Yes you can. And if you are unsure of yourself, mount it as RO to ensure that it is safe.

@Breffni-Potter said in Secure Wiki:

@Tim_G said in Secure Wiki:

I feel like WordPress may be a nice option. If the default access control structure doesn't work well for your needs, there are some great addins.

Not to mention the performance of the database over time, the bloating, PHP being a pig, so so many things wrong with it.

I'm not as familiar with this part because the biggest database I've ever had regarding this only consisted of about ~100k forum posts, several thousand users... wordpress articles only a few thousand, with like 50k images. So I can't really comment on wordpress database bloat on an enterprise level. Mine have never grown past like 30-50 meg... or something like that. May have been less I don't remember.

I'm not sure what you mean about what's wrong with WordPress... because it seems to always have worked great and performed very well for me and those I've set it up for.

If it's small things nobody notices, then who cares? Nitpicking? I'm very open minded, so if there's any punch behind this I'll definitely consider moving away from WordPress when using it externally.

@JaredBusch Could be. All I know is it's working now.

Great guide! Super helpful.

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/malware-uses-obscure-intel-cpu-feature-to-steal-data-and-avoid-firewalls/

For the TLDR

0_1493385958696_upload-54e54758-7d9b-44bc-9f06-2826daed2714

@JaredBusch said in Looking for how-to on setting up a proxy:

server {
client_max_body_size 40M;
listen 80;
server_name support.bundystl.com;
rewrite ^ https://$server_name$request_uri? permanent;
}

Yep, got all that done and it's working well. What I was referring to was redirecting traffic to HTTPS. Essentially this is the part of the file I was missing...

server { client_max_body_size 40M; listen 80; server_name support.bundystl.com; rewrite ^ https://$server_name$request_uri? permanent; }