What Synology has done, to make this claim kinda legit, is look at what disks "can" stream (which is more than is listed here) and added the "cap" of the network. So if you do a contrived operation that pushes the drives to their throughput limit (a useless number hence why we don't measure drives by that metric) but tells us nothing about performance. That could be just two or three IOPS producing that limit. But in the real world, that's not useful.

I have windows 10 on xs7, the issue are drivers are still in beta.

@NetworkNerd said in Get your free Meraki gear!:

So it's kind of the same as that thread from long ago where you advised get a HDS if you get a SAN, but don't get a SAN? If you're going to get UTM, get Palo Alto, but don't get a UTM.

Exactly 🙂

@Dashrender said in Considering Ubiquiti Wireless:

@scottalanmiller said in Considering Ubiquiti Wireless:

Yes, they keep operating. The controller is just remote configuration, it's not the brains of the device. You dont even need a controller at all. It is just for initial setup.

@scottalanmiller said in Considering Ubiquiti Wireless:

Of course keeping a controller is recommended. Just saying it isn't necessary.

Yep, you don't NEED a controller after configuration, but I would leave one running. It will keep stats on the APs for you.
I don't use RADIUS currently, so I'm not sure if that would require a controller or not?

I also haven't read up on roaming. I know it works seamlessly, I just don't know if a controller is required for that to function or not.

The only thing you absolutely need to leave a controller running all the time for is if you want to present a landing page on a guest network. At least when I set ours up a year ago that's how it was.

Good to hear. Did you figure out what had happened?

I don't have it in "production" any more. I have a few things at home set up on it. I originally had a separate zone for it. Everything in my house is pa.jhbcomputers.com so the zone for ZT was zt.jhbcomputers.com. Now I just have a local hosts file I can push out to whatever I want.

I'm not really using it that much though. I'm mostly just tunneling through my jump box.

I'd put NTG in that category. Year after year growth. But it's still very slow. But it is not a steady state, it's annual improvements. Two steps forward, one step back, but still more forward than back.

@maalmeida said in ¿Como crear un gatekeeper?:

Lo necesito implementar en un router y probar con un telefono SIP

No usamos eso para SIP en nuestros routers. No es necesario para el uso normal de SIP.

https://www.dialogic.com/den/developer_forums/f/9/t/5525.aspx

Dialogic ... parece que no tenemos esos.

Thanks.

3CX's behaviour as a company on the Spiceworks forums is additionally reason to not deal with the product.

Reasons for putting this on it's own firewall instead of my main network using a Unifi Guest network.

This is a placeholder post.

In some cases, understanding when you are or are not may only be important for understanding your own scope and responsibility. Knowing that you are not responsible for data loss when someone in management above you refuses recommended backups is important for sleeping at night or telling a future employer about a previous role.

Knowing that you do (or do not) actually run IT could be potentially important for explaining in a court case who is responsible for decisions leading to breaches, data losses or violations. Titles do not matter in court, roles do.

But in a more day to day, practical sense, explaining to management "above you" at your job that they have decided to take over as the head of IT and that that impacts how you and they need to think about your job. Maybe this can make your job better, maybe this can help management understand business failings. But if we can't put these things into words, we cannot begin to address them.

@Mike-Davis Did this work for you btw?

Okay, still not bad. Only peaking at 30% and not often at all.

@brianlittlejohn said in Best speakers for School Epson projector:

@Dashrender said in Best speakers for School Epson projector:

@scottalanmiller said in Best speakers for School Epson projector:

@Dashrender said in Best speakers for School Epson projector:

@scottalanmiller said in Best speakers for School Epson projector:

@Dashrender said in Best speakers for School Epson projector:

@scottalanmiller said in Best speakers for School Epson projector:

@travisdh1 said in Best speakers for School Epson projector:

@Dashrender said in Best speakers for School Epson projector:

@scottalanmiller said in Best speakers for School Epson projector:

@FiyaFly said in Best speakers for School Epson projector:

This seems to be incredibly subjective. This really depends on HOW much better, and what they're willing to pay for. I mean, I know an audiophile who can design, build, and setup the entire room with properly proportioned surround sound with speakers that have a "true to sound" quality for several thousand, but something tells me that isn't what you're looking for.

LOL... audiophile and surround sound don't go together 😉

I don't think I agree with that - but I'd have to check definitions to be sure... If you're a movie audiophile... I'd think you'd want surround more.. if you're a music audiophile.. then heck.. mono might be best.. but stereo is the norm.

I'd agree with @scottalanmiller on this one. I've got a 5.1 at home that sounds great. Still, any surround sound system has to modify the original signal.

If you don't have a screen to blast through, drop that center channel and your sound quality instantly improves. That center channel thing is the bane of sound quality.

For music sure.

Nope, you missed the point. It's better, period.

the problem with that is that most media have a dedicated center channel for dialog. Without that dialog can get muddled or lost.

Then your system is handling it wrong. Anything that is sent to the center channel sounds better when sent to the R and L channels equally. Literally, the center channel cannot improve the sound over stereo, it's not possible as you have no center ear. All the center channel does is break your perfect sound experience and risk colouration and cause reflection interference. In all seriousness, audio physics makes it impossible for a center channel to improve the sound quality.

well, then perhaps I have to find a way to turn off the center channel when using my receiver.. because when the center is simply unplugged, you can barely hear the dialog.

If you go into the receiver and tell it there is no center channel speaker it will output it to both L&R

And then the sound improves because you don't have this weird sound source floating in the middle of your soundstage disconnected from the stage itself.

@Danp said in XenServer 6.2 servers down. I have no Xen skill. Most likely networking? Help!:

@Dashrender said in XenServer 6.2 servers down. I have no Xen skill. Most likely networking? Help!:

The only cost here would be the drive. Clonezilla is free, the use of the PC is free (of course that user is not ideal, so I guess there is cost there 😉 )

The owner is currently out of the country... use his desktop! 😁

If AD works. Lol

@JaredBusch said in AD on top of something that depends on it:

No, JB would say, FFS stop conflating shit. A hypervisor is not a server or desktop OS.

LOL same difference 😛