What Are You Doing Right Now
-
Fixing more FFS items. No one ever setup Exchange IIS Log rotation so a client server backpressure last night causing mail flow to stop.
I addressed the immediate issue with PowerShell, having cleared ~40GB worth of logs....
This morning I finished setting up a scheduled task to manage this on a go-forward basis.
-
@dustinb3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Fixing more FFS items. No one ever setup Exchange IIS Log rotation so a client server backpressure last night causing mail flow to stop.
I addressed the immediate issue with PowerShell, having cleared ~40GB worth of logs....
This morning I finished setting up a scheduled task to manage this on a go-forward basis.
-
@travisdh1 Yup... I was shocked up much space was chewed up by the logs..
I was especially irked because it was midnight that I was called about this issue and had to fix it (granted 10 seconds but still).
-
Afternoon everyone! Enjoying a Fanta Naranja while working on some PostgreSQL stuff.
-
Searching through SOP documents to see if there's something that's younger than a decade old that relates to my question before playing a game of Email-Quest.
-
@gjacobse said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
I almost wished I had not run that query now - as now I just want to ....
Connected to and ran a query against AD and it looks like,... (dramatic pause while rechecking)
Total Accounts: 1048 Active Accounts: 476 Disabled Accounts: 525God help me. True that this includes service accounts and some other 'fluff'... but,... god - help - me.
-h-u.. h?
-
@gjacobse said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
I almost wished I had not run that query now - as now I just want to ....
Connected to and ran a query against AD and it looks like,... (dramatic pause while rechecking)
Total Accounts: 1048 Active Accounts: 476 Disabled Accounts: 525God help me. True that this includes service accounts and some other 'fluff'... but,... god - help - me.
Are there "inactive" but not disabled accounts since 476 + 525 = 1001?
-
After a long ass day, I'm kicking back with a beer and a joint, listening to the funk show on wrek.org Georgia Tech college station... Been a long time since I got to listen to this show from the beginning.
-
@rojoloco said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
After a long ass day, I'm kicking back with a beer and a joint, listening to the funk show on wrek.org Georgia Tech college station... Been a long time since I got to listen to this show from the beginning.
Gettin' seriously funky in here.....
-
-
Dealing with the frustration of having VMs in vCenter named for general VM function rather than the VM hostname.
-
@eddiejennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Dealing with the frustration of having VMs in vCenter named for general VM function rather than the VM hostname.
really? why would you want a VM name tied to it's host? Should we assume you'll never move a VM to another host?
-
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@eddiejennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Dealing with the frustration of having VMs in vCenter named for general VM function rather than the VM hostname.
really? why would you want a VM name tied to it's host? Should we assume you'll never move a VM to another host?
Because the VM and host is a one to one container/contained relationship.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@eddiejennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Dealing with the frustration of having VMs in vCenter named for general VM function rather than the VM hostname.
really? why would you want a VM name tied to it's host? Should we assume you'll never move a VM to another host?
Because the VM and host is a one to one container/contained relationship.
Until you move the VM to a different host.
-
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@eddiejennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Dealing with the frustration of having VMs in vCenter named for general VM function rather than the VM hostname.
really? why would you want a VM name tied to it's host? Should we assume you'll never move a VM to another host?
Let's say there's a VM with the hostname ATLSMTPV01, and the name of the VM in vCenter is Atlanta_Mail_Server_VM_01. If I get an alert that ATLSMTPV01 is down, and I can't access it via normal remote access tools, I want to be able to search for ATLSMTPV01 in vCenter to find the VM for console access rather than need to know to look for Atlanta_Mail_Server_VM_01.
-
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@eddiejennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Dealing with the frustration of having VMs in vCenter named for general VM function rather than the VM hostname.
really? why would you want a VM name tied to it's host? Should we assume you'll never move a VM to another host?
Because the VM and host is a one to one container/contained relationship.
Until you move the VM to a different host.
Huh? The VM and the hostname are always linked regardless of which hypervisor they are on.
-
Working on some audio editing before teaching a saxophone lesson.
-
@eddiejennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Working on some audio editing before teaching a saxophone lesson.
You mean a sexiphone lesson. Anyone who can play an instrument (and is of age) has sex appeal!
-
@dustinb3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@eddiejennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Working on some audio editing before teaching a saxophone lesson.
You mean a sexiphone lesson. Anyone who can play an instrument (and is of age) has sex appeal!
Put Jared’s sake back on the shelf
-
Video editing
