Creating a Static / Dynamic Stamp isn't overly difficult. But I seem to being having trouble with the script needed to prompt for data entry to complete it. I found / followed a decent YT video on the matter and after creating a basic Static Stamp, started working on the Dynamic Stamp.

Create Dynamic Stamp

After some initial issues with the script, I found that I had missed one symbol; that corrected Adobe was happy and moved forward. And over all, the process works as expected. Only when prompted for entry nothing is placed into the stamp and the other field are not prompted for.

if ((event.source.forReal)&&(event.source.stampName =="#PatientTest")) { this.getField("Patient Name").value = app.response("Patient Name:"); this.getField("Date of Birth").value = app.response("Patient DOB:"); this.getField("Patient ID").value = app.response("Patient ID:"); }

Despite the fact that it isn't working - I'm pretty satisfied with the result thus far. Back to searching why it isn't (seemingly) working.

OP Edited also.

@RojoLoco said in Adobe After Effects - Preview is not real time:

@scottalanmiller mid to late 90s. absolutely. I graduated with my audio degree end of '96, literally EVERY VENDOR had Apple's ball juice conspicuously on their chin. According to "the industry" at that time, nobody could record multitrack audio, use photoshop/after effects / premiere etc, or do any kind of multimedia production without a Mac. My personal mission since then has been to shit all over that mindset.

I know what you're talking about. At the end of the nineties I worked with a company that was running Protools on Windows NT and not Mac. It was rather unusual. System could do 64 tracks of 24 bit @ 48kHz on a Pentium II full of effects, but that was in large part because audio processing was offloaded to DSP cards. That's Digital Signal Processors for those who don't know. Audio tracks where recorded to SCSI disks. I remember it was a very stable and good system but it was extremely picky on hardware.

Hey Flash, get off my lawn!

@Danp said in Convert Inkling developer sites to PDF:

@DustinB3403 said in Convert Inkling developer sites to PDF:

wants to validate the content in a PDF.

Isn't the goal of Inkling to eliminate PDFs? 😁

grr stupid requirements clients.

FTFY.

Maybe this? https://github.com/angelabair/SBU101

Yeah..... it may but I'm not willing to send it over to a client if things are going to be shifty.

I'll tell the client that they are stupid to have this requirement before compromising our integrity.

@Jason said:

@coliver said:

@RojoLoco said:

Sumatra PDF has none of Adobe's BS. Clean installer and everything.

My preferred reader. Although I wish there was a way to add bookmarks to the pdfs.

Or lots of form fills and many other things that the PDF standard allows but Sumatra doesn't support. The reality is as much as Adobe sucks, if you use anything other than acrobat you will likely have some missing features

No question there. For basics Sumatra is awesome. As soon as you need more then Adobe is the way to go.

Ergo... not an important problem to solve 🙂

@scottalanmiller said:

@Breffni-Potter said:

So double click test says....

There is a password stopping me from reading/extracting the file.

But I can see the "newsecretdoc.txt" file - Just can't read it yet.

Does the unencryption software have any problem getting started on it?

Not started it yet, merrily working away on other things.

Most of those things, like Java for an HP ILO, can be isolated to networks that are not on the Internet or are highly protected. They don't need to be on general use machines.

I would generally agree that you should feel free to use this until/if the person you sold it to contacts you back.

I would not try to sell it again unless you can confirm 100% what happened to the last purchaser. If they did go under, there may be litigation against their assets and this could be considered part of it and found through the discovery process.

I'm a heavy Adobe Audition user, but I use an older version that I think is much better and I am dreading the day that I might have to go to the CC version.

Lol, pwnt

@garak0410 said:

@scottalanmiller said:

Correct, Adobe has moved to a pure subscription model.

I don't mind some subscription models (I actually like Office 365) but Abode's prices are just out of the park...

That's a completely different issue. They ALSO raised their prices. So now they cost more. If you were to have other buying options, they would cost just as much. The issue is that you don't like their new prices. That makes more sense.

I'd look to alternatives, Adobe operates on the assumption that their user base won't leave them at any price.