ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Topics
    2. Categories
    3. News
    Log in to post
    Load new posts
    • Recently Replied
    • Recently Created
    • Most Posts
    • Most Votes
    • Most Views
    • mlnewsM

      Some New Macs Risk Bricking from Third Party Repairs

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved apple macos mac pc ars technica apple t2
      49
      1 Votes
      49 Posts
      6k Views
      scottalanmillerS

      @DustinB3403 said in Some New Macs Risk Bricking from Third Party Repairs:

      @dafyre said in Some New Macs Risk Bricking from Third Party Repairs:

      @Dashrender said in Some New Macs Risk Bricking from Third Party Repairs:

      @DustinB3403 said in Some New Macs Risk Bricking from Third Party Repairs:

      Yeah I kind of have an issue with this. . .

      It's my device, if I want Joe from the mall kiosk to replace whatever in my device, that is my right to do, and I'd be the responsible person who risk the device being broken further or compromised with non-oem parts.

      On the other side of the conversation I understand Apple's reasoning for this and it's sounds like they simply want users to use OEM only parts, but they use this guise of "for security".

      Which also kind of irks me. . .

      Why do you call it a guise? If Apple doesn't make the interconnect APIs available, who knows what those knockoff people are making.

      I'm back to the point where the device should likely just hit you with a warning every 24 hours that you might have compromised shit installed - but I'm guessing that Scott and others will be against that level of frequency.

      I'm against a one time notice of there being a perceived security issue in the device.

      I'm not against a notification -- but every 24 hours seems excessive. Maybe a 30 second notification every reboot -- something that doesn't require any action other than waiting the 30 seconds.

      But this is just an "you may have been" there is no proof that something has been compromised. Just the possibility because a non approved person or company has worked on property you own.

      I think any notification that would force you to wait, period would be overly intrusive.

      Right, you MAY have been compromised with Apple's own stuff, too. But they would "conveniently" not show a warning. Therefore the warning would have nothing to do with risk, and everything to do with FUD.

    • mlnewsM

      Spectre, Meltdown researchers unveil 7 more speculative execution attacks

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved intel cpu security ars technica meltdown spectre
      1
      1 Votes
      1 Posts
      610 Views
      No one has replied
    • DonahueD

      Windows Server 2019 is back on

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      12
      2 Votes
      12 Posts
      908 Views
      DashrenderD

      @PhlipElder said in Windows Server 2019 is back on:

      Downloaded both the 1809 server and desktop clients from Volume Licensing Service Centre yesterday so the .ISO files are up on that side.

      Note that once the .ISO files are down, they are .107 so they will need the latest Servicing Stack Update (SSU) and Cumulative Update (CU) slipstreamed in to be current.

      Thanks - I looked in VLSC when this was posted here yesterday and it still wasn't posted. It is now posted and I'm downloading.

    • mlnewsM

      What Is In Store for HTTP3?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved http ars technica https3 udp networking
      2
      1 Votes
      2 Posts
      904 Views
      tonyshowoffT

      I'm curious as to how they'll deal with depletion of their 256 bit UUIDs and/or spoofing or anything else. We can know is that Google (and others) will have a way that works across IP addresses that will provide a fairly unique way of identifying you no matter what. Presumably some browsers will let you change it or have it different in privacy mode or whatever, but like with Don't Track we'll can almost guarentee that even if there is a standard some other company like Microsoft will implement it just differently enough to make a lot of it pointless... other than the connection speed I guess.

      People are already gungho about this, some thinking that it's a total replacement for the TCP stack which is utterly stupid. I first read about this in mid 2017 and noticed it seemed to be sort of a spin on MinimaLT which was specified to deal with mobile IP (as in protocol, not address) issues.

    • matteo nunziatiM

      Http/3 without tcp

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved http
      3
      0 Votes
      3 Posts
      610 Views
      matteo nunziatiM

      😕

    • mlnewsM

      Windows 10 Introducing New Disk Cleanup Features

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved windows 10 windows 10 19h1 windows storage softpedia
      1
      1 Votes
      1 Posts
      452 Views
      No one has replied
    • mlnewsM

      Another Major BGP Mishaps Redirects US Traffic to China

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved networking google youtube bgp routing ars technica
      3
      1 Votes
      3 Posts
      711 Views
      dafyreD

      @scottalanmiller said in Another Major BGP Mishaps Redirects US Traffic to China:

      I noticed that YouTube was down yesterday for a little bit. Very short, though.

      Even Facebook got taken out for a bit too... Don't know if it's related or not, but still...

    • CCWTechC

      Microsoft bug is changing Windows 10 Pro to Home

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved windows windows 10 microsoft
      12
      2 Votes
      12 Posts
      1k Views
      scottalanmillerS

      Just had our first person report issues this evening.

    • mlnewsM

      MS SQL Server 2017 on Linux Has Released

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved databases linux ms sql server 2017 ms sql server rdbms microsoft ms sql server on linux ms sql server 2017 linux
      19
      3 Votes
      19 Posts
      3k Views
      Reid CooperR

      @tonyshowoff said in MS SQL Server 2017 on Linux Has Released:

      Does it allow odd number processors yet or do I still have to disable one if I don't have an even number?

      Even only for licensing, I believe. No change there.

    • mlnewsM

      Activating Windows 10 with Windows 7 Keys Today

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved windows 10 software licensing windows licensing softopedia
      15
      2 Votes
      15 Posts
      2k Views
      scottalanmillerS

      @gjacobse said in Activating Windows 10 with Windows 7 Keys Today:

      @scottalanmiller said in Activating Windows 10 with Windows 7 Keys Today:

      @gjacobse said in Activating Windows 10 with Windows 7 Keys Today:

      @DustinB3403 said in Activating Windows 10 with Windows 7 Keys Today:

      @gjacobse said in Activating Windows 10 with Windows 7 Keys Today:

      @aaronstuder said in Activating Windows 10 with Windows 7 Keys Today:

      https://www.thurrott.com/windows/windows-10/142616/yes-can-still-clean-install-windows-10-windows-78-x-key

      Article coverd up by their stupid box saying your AdBlocker is showing...

      Not with pihole. 🙂

      I'm running one....

      You sure it is working?

      I'm no genius... but it shows it's working

      0_1541719164459_2018-11-08 18_19_03-Pi-hole Admin Console.png

      the Pi-Hole is running, you sure that that is what you are using for your DNS? Check with nslookup

    • scottalanmillerS

      Blockchain-based elections would be a disaster for democracy

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved voting ars technica blockchain
      14
      0 Votes
      14 Posts
      2k Views
      scottalanmillerS

      @JaredBusch said in Blockchain-based elections would be a disaster for democracy:

      @pmoncho said in Blockchain-based elections would be a disaster for democracy:

      @scottalanmiller said in Blockchain-based elections would be a disaster for democracy:

      @pmoncho said in Blockchain-based elections would be a disaster for democracy:

      @scottalanmiller said in Blockchain-based elections would be a disaster for democracy:

      @pmoncho said in Blockchain-based elections would be a disaster for democracy:

      @IRJ said in Blockchain-based elections would be a disaster for democracy:

      @JaredBusch said in Blockchain-based elections would be a disaster for democracy:

      @IRJ said in Blockchain-based elections would be a disaster for democracy:

      @JaredBusch said in Blockchain-based elections would be a disaster for democracy:

      @scottalanmiller said in Blockchain-based elections would be a disaster for democracy:

      @JaredBusch said in Blockchain-based elections would be a disaster for democracy:

      The technology itself makes for a great tamper proof system. but that is not the problem with a blockchain based election system.

      As the article states, the hard part about this technology is the loss of anonymity.

      And perception problems.

      I don't care about perception of people too stupid to even spell blockchain, let alone understand what it is.

      Blockchain election systems would be great technically.

      100% agree. Blockchain isnt quite ready for this yet, but will be very soon. I have done quit a bit of tinkering with my own Ethereum token with transactions, testing, etc.

      It isn't quite ready for the Broadway yet, but it's getting there and the concept is very solid. Some issues need to be addressed such as speed.

      The issues will not be technical. If you cannot have a 100% anonymous electorate, then you have people that can sell their votes (and prove it).

      The entire point of blockchain is accountability. You cannot have accountability and anonymity with the current design of blockchain.

      Retaliation based on political views could be a potential issue as well.

      I believe It may already be an issue and would get much worse.

      Right now it is based on perceived views. Which is bad. But you can imagine how mad people would be if they learned for certain how people voted.

      For the people who want that info kept private, it is a huge issue. Many people have no issue stating who they did not vote for or what party they belong to. Just like many have no issue posting their life on social media.

      Claiming and proving are very different things, though.

      Good point.

      Actually, the point. If people would be able to prove that they voted a certain way, the amount of money that flow into vote buying is nearly unimaginable.

      Yeah, someone paying for a vote might pay $.25 for someone's word on who they voted for. But might pay $100 for a proven vote.

    • mlnewsM

      nGinx Security Issue Exposes Some Uses to DoS Attacks, Patches Available

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved nginx denial of service security softpedia
      3
      1 Votes
      3 Posts
      635 Views
      scottalanmillerS

      Probably pretty minor, but just patch nGinx anyway 🙂

    • mlnewsM

      Linux 5 Announced for 2019

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved linux linux 5 linux 4.20 softopedia linux torvalds
      2
      1 Votes
      2 Posts
      588 Views
      DashrenderD

      So how much weed will be in the next release then?

    • mlnewsM

      VirtualBox Guest to Host ZeroDay on GitHub

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved virtualization virtualbox security zero day guest to host softpedia
      2
      0 Votes
      2 Posts
      667 Views
      black3dynamiteB

      Too bad KVM is not available on Mac then I can move from using Virtualbox.

    • mlnewsM

      Microsoft to Launch Linux Version of Sysinternals

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved microsoft linux sysinternals softopedia
      14
      2 Votes
      14 Posts
      2k Views
      CloudKnightC

      @scottalanmiller said in Microsoft to Launch Linux Version of Sysinternals:

      @StuartJordan said in Microsoft to Launch Linux Version of Sysinternals:

      ...it would still probably be less than windows though because you need to elevate privileges on Linux and we all know most people run with admin privileges on windows.

      That's not related to Linux vs. NTKernel (the Windows Kernel.) They are essentially identical there. You are seeing "common approaches from the userbase" and perceiving that behaviour as being caused by the kernel code, but it is not.

      Run Windows uses on a Linux-based OS and they will behave the same as they always did. Put Linux-based OS users on Windows and they are secure. It's the userbase, not the product, that has that effect.

      Windows is just as much "need elevated privileges to run" as any highly secure Linux distro, but Windows end users are way more likely to work around that, and be accepting of third party products that demand it.

      Port the Windows desktop to Linux, literally nothing will change, because those users will come along with it.

      I suppose I was meaning the userbase more then the actual kernel in that statement.

    • mlnewsM

      Windows Store Possible App History Exposure with Local Accounts

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved windows windows 10 security windows store softopedia
      1
      1 Votes
      1 Posts
      426 Views
      No one has replied
    • mlnewsM

      NetwiredRC Backdoor Used to Attack Holiday Suppliers

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved malware security softopedia netwiredrc backdoor
      1
      1 Votes
      1 Posts
      516 Views
      No one has replied
    • mlnewsM

      New Browswer Locker Malware Detected in the Wild

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved browser locker malware security softopedia
      1
      1 Votes
      1 Posts
      447 Views
      No one has replied
    • mlnewsM

      Future Plans for AMD Chips

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved amd cpu gpu processor tsmc ars technica
      1
      4 Votes
      1 Posts
      622 Views
      No one has replied
    • mlnewsM

      Strange snafu misroutes domestic US Internet traffic through China Telecom

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved ars technica china telecom security bgp networking isp
      5
      2 Votes
      5 Posts
      952 Views
      scottalanmillerS

      @Dashrender said in Strange snafu misroutes domestic US Internet traffic through China Telecom:

      @scottalanmiller said in Strange snafu misroutes domestic US Internet traffic through China Telecom:

      @Dashrender said in Strange snafu misroutes domestic US Internet traffic through China Telecom:

      Man - BGP needs an overhaul!

      Replaced!

      Is there something that can replace it now?

      Dont' think so. Not on that scale.

    • 1
    • 2
    • 12
    • 13
    • 14
    • 15
    • 16
    • 155
    • 156
    • 14 / 156