Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?
-
@gjacobse said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
@dafyre said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
If you are going to be doing RDS, I would recommend using User Profile Disks (UPD). It eliminates some of the complexities of roaming profiles. Apps that don't work well with roaming profiles work file with UPDs because it connects a VHDX to C:\Users\usersname as opposed to storing all the files on \someserver\someshare\username.
Not heard of UPD... but that is an interesting process.
Sadly, it's only for RDS right now. I wish they'd just set it up to replace roaming profiles. One disadvantage to UPD though -- you can only have the disk mounted on one server at a time. This normally isn't a problem with RDS deployments though.
-
I have had so many problems with roaming profiles over the years.
So I used redirected folders and offline files. Again lots of problems.
Finally ownCloud came out and I moved en masse to it.
-
@jaredbusch said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
I have had so many problems with roaming profiles over the years.
So I used redirected folders and offline files. Again lots of problems.
Finally ownCloud came out and I moved en masse to it.
Same here, Nextcloud makes all of that Windows overhead seem so silly. And frees you from Windows licensing, Windows desktop lock in, etc. all as bonuses.
-
@dafyre said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
If you are going to be doing RDS, I would recommend using User Profile Disks (UPD). It eliminates some of the complexities of roaming profiles. Apps that don't work well with roaming profiles work file with UPDs because it connects a VHDX to C:\Users\usersname as opposed to storing all the files on \someserver\someshare\username.
Interesting that this never came up in my mcsa.
But it looks like scale out file server would be required in this situation -
@flaxking said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
@dafyre said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
If you are going to be doing RDS, I would recommend using User Profile Disks (UPD). It eliminates some of the complexities of roaming profiles. Apps that don't work well with roaming profiles work file with UPDs because it connects a VHDX to C:\Users\usersname as opposed to storing all the files on \someserver\someshare\username.
Interesting that this never came up in my mcsa.
But it looks like scale out file server would be required in this situationYou need a reliable server. I do think it needs to be on SMB3 though. I've got this running on a Server 2012 R2 setup and have zero issues with it.
Edit: Just don't reboot the server that holds the UPDs while everybody is connected.
-
It sounds like they are pretty confident they can implement a good roaming profiles setup and are going to go ahead with it. It's their problem and not mine, so I'm going trust they know what they are doing.
-
Roaming profiles are an archaic approach and a major headache, always have been in every environment I've been in. They were a good idea when introduced, but constantly has issues. Folder redirection replaced roaming in some environments, but I've still had some of the weirdest issues with even folder redirection. There are other methods for storing files anymore.
-
I only use a small subset of roaming profiles, which is only to sync user certificates. It stores them in AD and are automatically loaded into their personal certificate store on the machines they log in to.
I wouldn't use more than that.
-
My advice is to not use roaming profiles and instead use Folder Redirection , they will be less trouble.
-
@dbeato said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
My advice is to not use roaming profiles and instead use Folder Redirection , they will be less trouble.
This is the best way to do it imo.
-
@dbeato said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
My advice is to not use roaming profiles and instead use Folder Redirection , they will be less trouble.
Also using roaming profiles will create different profile versions for each OS the RDS are on which can cause a lot headache with registry and applications.
-
@dbeato said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
My advice is to not use roaming profiles and instead use Folder Redirection , they will be less trouble.
Manual Folder Redirection with Symbolic Links
I've actually been using folder redirection with symbolic links instead of changing any of the user shell folders paths. And with some adjustments, its been working great for users that are using Nextcloud. -
@black3dynamite said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
@dbeato said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
My advice is to not use roaming profiles and instead use Folder Redirection , they will be less trouble.
Manual Folder Redirection with Symbolic Links
I've actually been using folder redirection with symbolic links instead of changing any of the user shell folders paths. And with some adjustments, its been working great for users that are using Nextcloud.That’s good that it works for you, although symbolic links can be a disaster if not properly configured in Windows.
-
@dbeato said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
@black3dynamite said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
@dbeato said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
My advice is to not use roaming profiles and instead use Folder Redirection , they will be less trouble.
Manual Folder Redirection with Symbolic Links
I've actually been using folder redirection with symbolic links instead of changing any of the user shell folders paths. And with some adjustments, its been working great for users that are using Nextcloud.That’s good that it works for you, although symbolic links can be a disaster if not properly configured in Windows.
How? I have never had a problem with symlinks.
-
@jaredbusch said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
@dbeato said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
@black3dynamite said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
@dbeato said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
My advice is to not use roaming profiles and instead use Folder Redirection , they will be less trouble.
Manual Folder Redirection with Symbolic Links
I've actually been using folder redirection with symbolic links instead of changing any of the user shell folders paths. And with some adjustments, its been working great for users that are using Nextcloud.That’s good that it works for you, although symbolic links can be a disaster if not properly configured in Windows.
How? I have never had a problem with symlinks.
Before Windows 10 to get a symlinknyou couldn’t do it without elevated permissions now is much improved. I was just stating that if not planned properly (meaning symlinks are created but configuration of NextCloud, OneDrive or whatever’s have you are not set) You wil have applications and data issues (which is expected) . Linux has very well set symlinks better than Windows in my opinion so far.
-
@dbeato said in Can Roaming Profiles be a good idea?:
Before Windows 10 to get a symlinknyou couldn’t do it without elevated permissions now is much improved.
I use directory junction (/J) instead of directory symbolic link (/D), which requires admin privileges. All I wanted is to create a link from
c:\users\user1\Desktoptoc:\users\user1\Nextcloud\Desktop.Edit: Now obviously there are more to it than just creating links to have it properly setup.
