Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems
-
@JaredBusch said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
But 5 years ago Yealink was good, and has only gotten better.
Also 5 years ago Snom was good and has stayed about the same.For what should I look at Grandstream when they sucked so bad.
I can say that about a lot of things...
Remember v1 of Hyper-V (with the Windows 2008/Vista code base).... -
@JaredBusch said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
@DustinB3403
The Ubiquiti phones are a gimmick. I would never seriously consider it. They are also extremely expensive comparatively.Yeah, this was my issue - they were easily 2x+ the cost of Yealink phones.
-
@FATeknollogee said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
@JaredBusch said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
But 5 years ago Yealink was good, and has only gotten better.
Also 5 years ago Snom was good and has stayed about the same.For what should I look at Grandstream when they sucked so bad.
I can say that about a lot of things...
Remember v1 of Hyper-V (with the Windows 2008/Vista code base)....Yes, that is why I specifically asked "For what should I look?"
Give me a real solid reason and I will.
This is what happened with Hyper-V. When Server 2012 was released with the new Hyper-V stack, I immediately was like cool, but f*** that s*. Not doing until someone shows me better evidence or I get the spare time to trial it.
It was not until Server 2012 R2 that I actually start deploying it, But that was simply because it took me that long to read enough trusted information and then test it myself.
-
@DustinB3403 Sure thing.
-
@JaredBusch said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
It was not until Server 2012 R2 that I actually start deploying it, But that was simply because it took me that long to read enough trusted information and then test it myself.
What did you move from out of curiousity?
-
@JaredBusch said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
@DustinB3403
The Ubiquiti phones are a gimmick. I would never seriously consider it. They are also extremely expensive comparatively.Cool thanks for the feedback.
-
@wirestyle22 said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
@JaredBusch said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
It was not until Server 2012 R2 that I actually start deploying it, But that was simply because it took me that long to read enough trusted information and then test it myself.
What did you move from out of curiousity?
VMWare like pretty much everyone in the SMB space.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
@fuznutz04 Do you think it was because of the mono speaker or just in general the underlying hardware?
Have you tried the executive version of the phone with stereo sound?
I don't really know. I haven't taken the time to really test with it, because I immediately decided that I wouldn't want to use one. For an executive who wants a nice looking phone on his desk, sure, this is OK. But for real world usefulness in a business setting, I would never deploy these.
-
I have used both Snom and Yealink. Yealink wins hands down. Now for speaker phone my favorites are Revolabs.
-
Revolabs equipment is pretty ugly. . .
Can't they pretty it up a bit. . .
-
@DustinB3403 said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
Revolabs equipment is pretty ugly. . .
Can't they pretty it up a bit. . .
might be ugly but the sound quality is amazing. Both the speaker and the microphones.
-
@Minion-Queen that may be, but appearance is the first thing that people notice.
-
I actually like the Grandstream. I use the 5 GXP2140s in my office. A great PoE phone. I don't have very complex needs but the quality is great and it works. Sound quality is pretty good too.
-
@coliver said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
They are Android based IIRC. They look sharp and the pricing isn't bad. I think @scottalanmiller had gotten one to test with previously?
Want one, but have not acquired one yet. They look super cool, though.
-
@wirestyle22 said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
@coliver said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
They are Android based IIRC. They look sharp and the pricing isn't bad. I think @scottalanmiller had gotten one to test with previously?
Yeah I think he did but didn't like them. Scott prefers Sangoma and Snom if I remember correctly.
Our experience with Grandstream is that they were insanely cheap and worked okay and died often. If you need something that is going to get beat up and won't last long anyway or is super likely to be stolen, they are great. But over time, you don't save money and they are very obviously a cheaper phone. So it's not like they were "bad", but once Yealink got withing 20% of their price, their point was really gone.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
@wirestyle22 said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
@coliver said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
They are Android based IIRC. They look sharp and the pricing isn't bad. I think @scottalanmiller had gotten one to test with previously?
Yeah I think he did but didn't like them. Scott prefers Sangoma and Snom if I remember correctly.
Our experience with Grandstream is that they were insanely cheap and worked okay and died often. If you need something that is going to get beat up and won't last long anyway or is super likely to be stolen, they are great. But over time, you don't save money and they are very obviously a cheaper phone. So it's not like they were "bad", but once Yealink got withing 20% of their price, their point was really gone.
How long ago was that? I have 65 of them working great right now.....
-
@aaronstuder said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
@scottalanmiller said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
@wirestyle22 said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
@coliver said in Ubiquiti VOIP phone systems:
They are Android based IIRC. They look sharp and the pricing isn't bad. I think @scottalanmiller had gotten one to test with previously?
Yeah I think he did but didn't like them. Scott prefers Sangoma and Snom if I remember correctly.
Our experience with Grandstream is that they were insanely cheap and worked okay and died often. If you need something that is going to get beat up and won't last long anyway or is super likely to be stolen, they are great. But over time, you don't save money and they are very obviously a cheaper phone. So it's not like they were "bad", but once Yealink got withing 20% of their price, their point was really gone.
How long ago was that? I have 65 of them working great right now.....
Key words... right now
-
With T56 series here the 48s dropped down to $170 range, everything else has gotten even cheaper.
The t56a is the cost that Yealink 48s was a month ago, and it is android. About $199.
I got Ubiquiti phones in to test and have updated them a couple times. At last pass they still couldn't park or use BLF reliably.
I can't imagine leaving Yealink.
