Time to gut the network - thoughts?
-
@Dashrender said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
I currently don't have any ACLs between VLANs.
No zone policy either?
-
@Dashrender said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
Anyone know from experience if the Edgeswitches can do this? The specs claim they can.
Looks like it. But as you can see, I don't use it for that.
-
Can you really get more than 1Gb/s between the buildings? Is it worth going to 10Gb/s now?
-
@scottalanmiller said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
Can you really get more than 1Gb/s between the buildings? Is it worth going to 10Gb/s now?
A good point. None of the clients will really benefit from this.
You're still bottlenecked at each client and at the router.
-
@stacksofplates said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
@Dashrender said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
I currently don't have any ACLs between VLANs.
No zone policy either?
I don't know what that is.
-
@stacksofplates said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
@scottalanmiller said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
Can you really get more than 1Gb/s between the buildings? Is it worth going to 10Gb/s now?
A good point. None of the clients will really benefit from this.
You're still bottlenecked at each client and at the router.
Yeah I was wondering wondering that myself. Converting to 10 Gb dollar wise isn't that much more than 1Gb, but percentage wise is huge on the components, like 100%+.
As mentioned it's probably just a waste of money.
-
With 10Gb tho, he can loose 2 of the 3 fiber runs and the network won't notice. Besides, it's not like 10Gb adapters for servers are very expensive from a place like xByte, right @xByteSean?
-
@travisdh1 That said, I don't know what the price difference actually is myself. For servers and backbone it might be worth the upgrade all around.
-
@travisdh1 said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
@travisdh1 That said, I don't know what the price difference actually is myself. For servers and backbone it might be worth the upgrade all around.
I'd have to get a different/additional switch to have enough 10Gb ports to cover servers. That kinda makes it not worth it.
Assuming the use of only one of the ES-48-500w as a backbone switch, it only has two 10Gb ports.
-
Are you maxing out your 1Gb ports? That's what would push me to 10Gb.
-
(hijacking on)
also thinking of upgrading some networking gear with the EdgeSwitch
-
@travisdh1 said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
@travisdh1 That said, I don't know what the price difference actually is myself. For servers and backbone it might be worth the upgrade all around.
Refurbs aren't bad, but new NICs are around $250-300 and if you use SFP then it's even more.
-
@Dashrender said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
@stacksofplates said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
@Dashrender said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
I currently don't have any ACLs between VLANs.
No zone policy either?
I don't know what that is.
Instead of straight ACL firewall rules.
I guess I don't see the point in VLANs with no firewall rules.
-
If it were me, I'd bump those HP 2650's up to the Ubiquiti equivalents and just stick with 1Gig backbone, unless you're consistently pushing the 1gig links pretty hard. If the price difference between 1gig and 10gig SFPs aren't that big, then I would consider going to 10Gig.
I'd also just leave the HP 2824 as the VLAN router since there's no real rules like that. Or get the EdgeRouter as a primary and keep the 2824 as a backup.
-
@Mike-Davis said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
Are you maxing out your 1Gb ports? That's what would push me to 10Gb.
No, not really. 90%+ of our network traffic goes over the fiber link to the internet. We have a 100/20 internet connection.
-
I put 10 Gb on the table mainly because it's actual cost over 1 Gb links was around $100 more per link and it would give me a chance to - just do it.
But as I mentioned above, when I put my IT hat one, you know, the one where we do what's best for the company - which includes being financially responsible - well, I suppose I should just save that $200 because it's really not going to gain us anything.
-
@Dashrender said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
I put 10 Gb on the table mainly because it's actual cost over 1 Gb links was around $100 more per link and it would give me a chance to - just do it.
But as I mentioned above, when I put my IT hat one, you know, the one where we do what's best for the company - which includes being financially responsible - well, I suppose I should just save that $200 because it's really not going to gain us anything.
How often are you pushing out images to a new desktop that would definitely be filling up your pipe if you're trying to do more than one or two at a time?
-
@Dashrender said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
I put 10 Gb on the table mainly because it's actual cost over 1 Gb links was around $100 more per link and it would give me a chance to - just do it.
But as I mentioned above, when I put my IT hat one, you know, the one where we do what's best for the company - which includes being financially responsible - well, I suppose I should just save that $200 because it's really not going to gain us anything.
Does the fiber between those buildings support 10G? For 200$ this seems like a no brainer to me. It's not enough to cause any issues with accounting and it introduces some opportunity. I know, buy for what you need now and not what you need tomorrow but $200 just doesn't seem like much.
-
@stacksofplates said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
@Dashrender said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
@stacksofplates said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
@Dashrender said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
I currently don't have any ACLs between VLANs.
No zone policy either?
I don't know what that is.
Instead of straight ACL firewall rules.
I guess I don't see the point in VLANs with no firewall rules.
Legacy understanding, and the belief (by the phone installation company) that VLANs would allow QOS for the IP phones.
Of course the use of VLANs does allow for VLAN X to have a higher QOS level, but if the switch is saturated by traffic on other VLANs, I suppose the switch should give priority to the QOS ratings, but I probably have problems to fix.
One thing I've considered to dumping the VLANs and moving to /23 or /22.
-
@JaredBusch said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
@Dashrender said in Time to gut the network - thoughts?:
I put 10 Gb on the table mainly because it's actual cost over 1 Gb links was around $100 more per link and it would give me a chance to - just do it.
But as I mentioned above, when I put my IT hat one, you know, the one where we do what's best for the company - which includes being financially responsible - well, I suppose I should just save that $200 because it's really not going to gain us anything.
How often are you pushing out images to a new desktop that would definitely be filling up your pipe if you're trying to do more than one or two at a time?
Never.
I don't use multicasting for deploying images, so each image would be it's own stream. I'm not sure what my disk through would give me much more than 1 Gb/s.The closest I come is when doing updates manually at a workstation - say to 1607. In that case, I'd probably be maxed at around 4 machines at once.
