Placeholder

I was pretty surprised to find that uuidgen was not available, not even available for install!

@scottalanmiller said in Oracle Laid Off Most Of Solaris Team: @marcinozga said in Oracle Laid Off Most Of Solaris Team: I hope all these devs form some entity and continue to work on Solaris fork. I'd love to see OpenSolaris come to life again. Often they can't because they've seen too much closed code What if they move north of the border? Or south...

Hope they will keep the pace

Good stuff, I've long been a Sparc fan.

@scottalanmiller said in UNIX: Switching Users with su: @Grey said in UNIX: Switching Users with su: Pop quiz: why do you need the dash with su? That was in the original article. And I quoted you without quoting you..... see what I did there, I switched a few words

@Dashrender said in ZFS is Perfectly Safe on Hardware RAID: @scottalanmiller said in ZFS is Perfectly Safe on Hardware RAID: @Dashrender said in ZFS is Perfectly Safe on Hardware RAID: @scottalanmiller said in ZFS is Perfectly Safe on Hardware RAID: @Pete-S said in ZFS is Perfectly Safe on Hardware RAID: @Obsolesce said in ZFS is Perfectly Safe on Hardware RAID: @scottalanmiller said in ZFS is Perfectly Safe on Hardware RAID: @Obsolesce said in ZFS is Perfectly Safe on Hardware RAID: Hardware RAID controllers should not be used with ZFS This part is obviously just BS. They even have this details list of reasons that if you study it, none of them would result in this conclusion. So this is where the "someone writing the docs through in a little unwarranted opinion" without anything substantiating it. In older docs, this was wrapped with a qualifying statement that includes "if you want ZFS to handle some of these functions." It looks like someone who didn't understand the source document copied what everyone things is the implication, but isn't at all, and missed their own technical details. I'm not following the context here... I didn't say what you quoted me saying. In a scenario where one wants to use ZFS as a LVM and software RAID, that is why I said to use HBA on hardware, rather than a RAID card: You would NOT want to use a hardware RAID card and use either passthrough disks or set each disk as a RAID 0. You should use an HBA instead, for ZFS' LVM and software RAID use. What's the difference here? A RAID card is just like a pure HBA but with RAID logic. The problem is, many RAID cards won't turn off the RAID logic and encapsulation. Hence the need for RAID 0, which could shield the actual drive from ZFS, I'm guessing. No, needing RAID 0 is the thing I'm talking about. The RAID is still there, hence "can't turn it off." That is what I was saying - the RAID is still there.. it's a RAID 0.. where HBA wouldn't have RAID at all. The disk is just presented as a disk. Many RAID cards do that, too. It is really just one popular one that doesn't let you, AFAIK.

@JJoyner1985 said in UNIX: What Is a Tarball: So, do you think the reason I am seeing a lot more gzip in use with tarballs is due to the familiarity of gzip and the negligible difference in the compression between it and bzip2? Basically, bzip2 doesn't make enough of an improvement with sufficient regularity to entice people to move away from gzip, or is there some other benefit to gzip that my training material hasn't covered? That's correct. The difference between the two is generally small enough that people are not concerned. And lots of systems still don't have bzip2 installed by default so if you want scripts or whatever to work universally you often use gzip because you know that it is always there and predictable.

Sure, mentioned it only for completeness.

Thanks!

Youtube Video

As long as it is "almost" boring, it is still exciting!

@matteo-nunziati said in Open Storage Operating Systems for SAM-SD: what a mess... Windows desktops are loaded with software that you are only limited as to how you can use it by EULA as well.

I loved SunOS, Solaris, and OpenSolaris, but after the Oracle buyout all of the Sun equipment has been slowly replaced and has gone away for the most part, and with the important features being ported to other OSes like FreeBSD, there's not much of a real reason to use OpenSolaris or its babies. Having said that though, I'm put off by the name OpenIndiana, it just sounds really stupid to me, and I don't think I could ever install something like that without flat out denying it if anyone asked. It just makes me think "that's the best name you could come up with, huh? Not even anything remotely related to the Sun or stars or anything..." (I realise the origin comes from a project name, but sticking with it was a mistake, so in a sense I guess I should say "So, couldn't come up with anything at all?")

The FreeNAS community really shows just how important it is to avoid products like FreeNAS. It's built on good tech, but the issues are that the community is horrible, only tiny non-storage expert shops use it and it is broadly misunderstood. FreeNAS doesn't make any of the technology, they just repackage it. So the vendor and their community all lack the basic knowledge of what they have and the stuff that they repeat just gets worse and worse. If this was the FreeBSD community, talking about the same technologies, the answers and approaches would be completely different. Enterprises use FreeBSD every day. They do not use FreeNAS. Once you limit yourself to a "non-expert" product, the idea of using a community for assistance causes a breakdown in dangerous ways.

@scottalanmiller said: NTG started using network UPS in 2000. APC SmartUPS supported that even way back then. I've asked for an OK for funds to purchase a model that can support up to 1800 watts, something like a desktop model that can attach to the network, and allow for Solaris systems to detect they are on battery and shutdown without my interaction. Tripplite is getting back with me, hopefully it's not overly expensive.