ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?

    IT Discussion
    virtualization hyper-v management ssd raid5 kvm xenserver esxi autocad smb education
    11
    89
    11.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L
      luismc
      last edited by

      CAD files are small, about 350KB on average. Apparently some of these Revit files are pretty big (150MB). One of the employees with a "faster computer" opens a file and it takes about 30 seconds. Others go grab a coffee and come back. Kind of absurd, if you ask me. The network is setup with GigE.
      I chose SSDs because the client insisted. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think there would be a big difference in pricing if I did HDD RAID10 vs SSD RAID5, at least that's what I thought when I ran the specs.

      scottalanmillerS matteo nunziatiM 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @luismc
        last edited by

        @luismc said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

        I chose SSDs because the client insisted. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think there would be a big difference in pricing if I did HDD RAID10 vs SSD RAID5, at least that's what I thought when I ran the specs.

        Typically it is a big difference, but it depends on the deal that you get. That's only four 2TB NL-SAS drives. Would be super cheap with spinners.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @luismc
          last edited by

          @luismc said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

          CAD files are small, about 350KB on average. Apparently some of these Revit files are pretty big (150MB). One of the employees with a "faster computer" opens a file and it takes about 30 seconds. Others go grab a coffee and come back. Kind of absurd, if you ask me. The network is setup with GigE.

          Seems unlikely that they'd notice a change to a WAN link, unless this is an SMB limit from lots of small files, which might easily be the case. But a sync client might fix that, but introduce other annoyances.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • matteo nunziatiM
            matteo nunziati @luismc
            last edited by

            @luismc said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

            CAD files are small, about 350KB on average. Apparently some of these Revit files are pretty big (150MB). One of the employees with a "faster computer" opens a file and it takes about 30 seconds. Others go grab a coffee and come back. Kind of absurd, if you ask me. The network is setup with GigE.
            I chose SSDs because the client insisted. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think there would be a big difference in pricing if I did HDD RAID10 vs SSD RAID5, at least that's what I thought when I ran the specs.

            For little files on LAN, SATA could be the bottleneck but for bigger files LAN is the bottleneck. Some 3D modeling softwares act really bad with Samba (linux layer to expose services to winodws clients). Or Solidworks files hang at opening from a linux NAS (buffalo). Moving them to a real windows machine solves the problem.

            For remote access: how many people need this simoultaneously?! how meny times?!

            @scottalanmiller is not fan of road warrior VPN but I'll invent more on a proper WAN connection and go SATA or NL-SAS OBR10.

            Also would check what limits employer loading: is the PC really running lot of computation? is the server really spinning? is just everything stalling due to SMB protocol issues?!

            L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • L
              luismc @matteo nunziati
              last edited by

              @matteo-nunziati @scottalanmiller so I guess I'm better off going RAID10 SATA or NL-SAS rather than RAID5 SSD then? I know my original post mentioned 4 drives, but they were complaining that it wouldn't be enough space in the future so I was going to add another. Not sure if that makes a difference and also not sure about the rebuild times for both cases.

              scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @luismc
                last edited by

                @luismc said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                @matteo-nunziati @scottalanmiller so I guess I'm better off going RAID10 SATA or NL-SAS rather than RAID5 SSD then? I know my original post mentioned 4 drives, but they were complaining that it wouldn't be enough space in the future so I was going to add another. Not sure if that makes a difference and also not sure about the rebuild times for both cases.

                This makes the NL-SAS RAID 10 approach make way more sense then. The SSD with RAID 5 will get expensive quickly as you add drives or go for larger drive sizes. You are getting 2.4TB here. The smallest reasonable RAID 10 would be 4TB usable. Go to 3TB or 4TB drives, still very cheap, and you get 6TB and 8TB usable for that small, additional cost.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @luismc
                  last edited by

                  @luismc said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                  Not sure if that makes a difference and also not sure about the rebuild times for both cases.

                  SSD rebuilds are typically insanely fast. But RAID 10 rebuilds typically don't matter due to insanely high reliability and low impact from rebuilding. Worrying about the time to rebuild is a RAID 5/6 problem. Once you have RAID 10, you normally stop talking about time to rebuild because you can keep using the system just fine while it rebuilds.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • S
                    StorageNinja Vendor @DustinB3403
                    last edited by

                    @dustinb3403 said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                    SBS2008 setup

                    BURN IT WITH FIRE

                    Virtual gives you more options for migration later. It gives you more options for backup and recovery.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      StorageNinja Vendor @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                      A VPN adds overhead and latency

                      You sir, have not seen what a pair of Brocade MLXe's can do with a dark fiber connection. A fully loaded chassis could push 1.2Tbps of IPSEC traffic at wire speed.

                      Shitty consumer grade, no crypto ASIC stuff? Yah, there are limits. The latency your complaining about? That's likely from trying to run UDP real time protocols WITHOUT configuring datagram TLS? OUCH. Yah that's gonna suck. Use a real VPN appliance that will support dTLS.

                      DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DashrenderD
                        Dashrender @StorageNinja
                        last edited by

                        @storageninja said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                        A VPN adds overhead and latency

                        You sir, have not seen what a pair of Brocade MLXe's can do with a dark fiber connection. A fully loaded chassis could push 1.2Tbps of IPSEC traffic at wire speed.

                        Shitty consumer grade, no crypto ASIC stuff? Yah, there are limits. The latency your complaining about? That's likely from trying to run UDP real time protocols WITHOUT configuring datagram TLS? OUCH. Yah that's gonna suck. Use a real VPN appliance that will support dTLS.

                        What is the cost of stuff like that? Recall that most people here come from SMBs where we are now recommending ER-L firewalls that cost $150 or less.

                        stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • stacksofplatesS
                          stacksofplates @Dashrender
                          last edited by

                          @dashrender said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                          @storageninja said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                          @scottalanmiller said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                          A VPN adds overhead and latency

                          You sir, have not seen what a pair of Brocade MLXe's can do with a dark fiber connection. A fully loaded chassis could push 1.2Tbps of IPSEC traffic at wire speed.

                          Shitty consumer grade, no crypto ASIC stuff? Yah, there are limits. The latency your complaining about? That's likely from trying to run UDP real time protocols WITHOUT configuring datagram TLS? OUCH. Yah that's gonna suck. Use a real VPN appliance that will support dTLS.

                          What is the cost of stuff like that? Recall that most people here come from SMBs where we are now recommending ER-L firewalls that cost $150 or less.

                          I don't think that was the point of his post.

                          DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DashrenderD
                            Dashrender @stacksofplates
                            last edited by

                            @stacksofplates said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                            @dashrender said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                            @storageninja said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                            @scottalanmiller said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                            A VPN adds overhead and latency

                            You sir, have not seen what a pair of Brocade MLXe's can do with a dark fiber connection. A fully loaded chassis could push 1.2Tbps of IPSEC traffic at wire speed.

                            Shitty consumer grade, no crypto ASIC stuff? Yah, there are limits. The latency your complaining about? That's likely from trying to run UDP real time protocols WITHOUT configuring datagram TLS? OUCH. Yah that's gonna suck. Use a real VPN appliance that will support dTLS.

                            What is the cost of stuff like that? Recall that most people here come from SMBs where we are now recommending ER-L firewalls that cost $150 or less.

                            I don't think that was the point of his post.

                            my question still stands.

                            stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stacksofplatesS
                              stacksofplates @Dashrender
                              last edited by

                              @dashrender said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                              @stacksofplates said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                              @dashrender said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                              @storageninja said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                              @scottalanmiller said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                              A VPN adds overhead and latency

                              You sir, have not seen what a pair of Brocade MLXe's can do with a dark fiber connection. A fully loaded chassis could push 1.2Tbps of IPSEC traffic at wire speed.

                              Shitty consumer grade, no crypto ASIC stuff? Yah, there are limits. The latency your complaining about? That's likely from trying to run UDP real time protocols WITHOUT configuring datagram TLS? OUCH. Yah that's gonna suck. Use a real VPN appliance that will support dTLS.

                              What is the cost of stuff like that? Recall that most people here come from SMBs where we are now recommending ER-L firewalls that cost $150 or less.

                              I don't think that was the point of his post.

                              my question still stands.

                              Expensive. But again, that wasn't his point. ASIC offloading and dTLS aren't only available in those. Ubiquiti does crypto ASIC. Last place I worked we did 3D CAD with SolidWorks over ZeroTier and it wasn't bad. There is likely some serious tuning that could be done here.

                              L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • L
                                luismc @stacksofplates
                                last edited by

                                @stacksofplates said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                                @dashrender said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                                @stacksofplates said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                                @dashrender said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                                @storageninja said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                                @scottalanmiller said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                                A VPN adds overhead and latency

                                You sir, have not seen what a pair of Brocade MLXe's can do with a dark fiber connection. A fully loaded chassis could push 1.2Tbps of IPSEC traffic at wire speed.

                                Shitty consumer grade, no crypto ASIC stuff? Yah, there are limits. The latency your complaining about? That's likely from trying to run UDP real time protocols WITHOUT configuring datagram TLS? OUCH. Yah that's gonna suck. Use a real VPN appliance that will support dTLS.

                                What is the cost of stuff like that? Recall that most people here come from SMBs where we are now recommending ER-L firewalls that cost $150 or less.

                                I don't think that was the point of his post.

                                my question still stands.

                                Expensive. But again, that wasn't his point. ASIC offloading and dTLS aren't only available in those. Ubiquiti does crypto ASIC. Last place I worked we did 3D CAD with SolidWorks over ZeroTier and it wasn't bad. There is likely some serious tuning that could be done here.

                                ZeroTier looks pretty dope. I'm curious to set this up and see how well it behaves.

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @luismc
                                  last edited by

                                  @luismc said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                                  @stacksofplates said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                                  @dashrender said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                                  @stacksofplates said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                                  @dashrender said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                                  @storageninja said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                                  @scottalanmiller said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                                  A VPN adds overhead and latency

                                  You sir, have not seen what a pair of Brocade MLXe's can do with a dark fiber connection. A fully loaded chassis could push 1.2Tbps of IPSEC traffic at wire speed.

                                  Shitty consumer grade, no crypto ASIC stuff? Yah, there are limits. The latency your complaining about? That's likely from trying to run UDP real time protocols WITHOUT configuring datagram TLS? OUCH. Yah that's gonna suck. Use a real VPN appliance that will support dTLS.

                                  What is the cost of stuff like that? Recall that most people here come from SMBs where we are now recommending ER-L firewalls that cost $150 or less.

                                  I don't think that was the point of his post.

                                  my question still stands.

                                  Expensive. But again, that wasn't his point. ASIC offloading and dTLS aren't only available in those. Ubiquiti does crypto ASIC. Last place I worked we did 3D CAD with SolidWorks over ZeroTier and it wasn't bad. There is likely some serious tuning that could be done here.

                                  ZeroTier looks pretty dope. I'm curious to set this up and see how well it behaves.

                                  A lot of us have used it, it's a really cool product. Their founder is here in the community, too.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • L
                                    luismc @Dashrender
                                    last edited by

                                    @dashrender said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                                    As for Sharepoint - You don't get that much storage in Sharepoint in O365, so you'll likely be paying for more storage there. Sharepoint also has a number of files per site limit, just something else to watch out for.

                                    For future reference to anyone wondering, I spoke to three different O365 reps today and they said the limit has been bumped to 1 million items so we'll be good for a while!

                                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @luismc
                                      last edited by

                                      @luismc said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                                      @dashrender said in Port - How to go about setting up a client to be virtualized?:

                                      As for Sharepoint - You don't get that much storage in Sharepoint in O365, so you'll likely be paying for more storage there. Sharepoint also has a number of files per site limit, just something else to watch out for.

                                      For future reference to anyone wondering, I spoke to three different O365 reps today and they said the limit has been bumped to 1 million items so we'll be good for a while!

                                      That's a bit more!

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • 1
                                      • 2
                                      • 3
                                      • 4
                                      • 5
                                      • 5 / 5
                                      • First post
                                        Last post