What Are You Doing Right Now
-
Morning all!
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Morning all!
mutters ... Need coffee.... and for pine trees to quit trying to grow in my head and chest.
-
@dafyre said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Morning all!
mutters ... Need coffee.... and for pine trees to quit trying to grow in my head and chest.
I just got my 1st coffee... same feelings about the pines. But at least it's been cooler weather. I turned my heat on for a few minutes this morning.
-
@RojoLoco said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dafyre said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Morning all!
mutters ... Need coffee.... and for pine trees to quit trying to grow in my head and chest.
I just got my 1st coffee... same feelings about the pines. But at least it's been cooler weather. I turned my heat on for a few minutes this morning.
Nice! It's still warm enough to need a jacket in the morning and leave it behind by lunch.
-
Working with Dell support all day to get a resolution/ tech dispatched to my customer.
-
Power keeps going off for a few minutes. Not tragic but so annoying.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Power keeps going off for a few minutes. Not tragic but so annoying.
Surely you have all your important things on UPS... Things like... your internet and such? lol.
-
@dafyre said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Power keeps going off for a few minutes. Not tragic but so annoying.
Surely you have all your important things on UPS... Things like... your internet and such? lol.
You only get a very little bit on UPS. Big UPS are expensive here.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dafyre said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Power keeps going off for a few minutes. Not tragic but so annoying.
Surely you have all your important things on UPS... Things like... your internet and such? lol.
You only get a very little bit on UPS. Big UPS are expensive here.
Big UPS are expensive everywhere.
-
Just doing a simple update of VMware is so onerous, I swear I could migrate people to KVM faster than you can run the VMware updates.
-
All weekend it is doing a VMware migration from 6.5 to 6.7 on two hosts, not a cluster. Should be SO simple.
As this is VMware, it's over 150 hours of engineering time already. VMware support had to be engaged as we hit a bug in VMware's code that they didn't patch and doesn't get hit very often and it took them hours to figure out once they were engaged.
VMware is a train wreck. If we were doing this on ProxMox, this entire process would have been fifteen minutes, for real.
And we have a green zone. There's no attempt to do this online. This is a powered down process, and VMware can't do it.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
All weekend it is doing a VMware migration from 6.5 to 6.7 on two hosts, not a cluster. Should be SO simple.
As this is VMware, it's over 150 hours of engineering time already. VMware support had to be engaged as we hit a bug in VMware's code that they didn't patch and doesn't get hit very often and it took them hours to figure out once they were engaged.
VMware is a train wreck. If we were doing this on ProxMox, this entire process would have been fifteen minutes, for real.
And we have a green zone. There's no attempt to do this online. This is a powered down process, and VMware can't do it.
Ouch - That doesn't offer much confidence.
-
@gjacobse said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
All weekend it is doing a VMware migration from 6.5 to 6.7 on two hosts, not a cluster. Should be SO simple.
As this is VMware, it's over 150 hours of engineering time already. VMware support had to be engaged as we hit a bug in VMware's code that they didn't patch and doesn't get hit very often and it took them hours to figure out once they were engaged.
VMware is a train wreck. If we were doing this on ProxMox, this entire process would have been fifteen minutes, for real.
And we have a green zone. There's no attempt to do this online. This is a powered down process, and VMware can't do it.
Ouch - That doesn't offer much confidence.
Nothing about my real world experience with VMware inspires confidence. Nearly every deployment seems to be done based on emotions or confusion (you mean there are other options? but I've seen ads for this? but it is expensive, it must be good?) so the starting point is bad. And every deployment seems to need to bring in specialized outside help because nobody can manage it on their own. Every aspect of it is 100x harder than with every other product out there. People act like it is easy or well known, but how can every IT shop easily support KVM, Xen or HyperV, but we always have to get brought in as VMware specialists because no one can run patches reliably on ESXi?
-
binged the Matrix movies over the last 3 days. they left the last one wide open for 5th film.
still reckon the original is the best. -
@siringo said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
binged the Matrix movies over the last 3 days. they left the last one wide open for 5th film.
still reckon the original is the best.I reckon they should have left it at one. There was just something missing from the others that followed. Don't get me wrong, I have watched 2 & 3 and I did like them but I just feel that they were unnecessary.
-
@nadnerB said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@siringo said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
binged the Matrix movies over the last 3 days. they left the last one wide open for 5th film.
still reckon the original is the best.I reckon they should have left it at one. There was just something missing from the others that followed. Don't get me wrong, I have watched 2 & 3 and I did like them but I just feel that they were unnecessary.
eh. maybe, dunno. at least the follow ups were watchable.
i'll be back onto sbs now, see what new Scandi noir masterpiece I can wrap my eyeballs around.
-
New hire orientation.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@gjacobse said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
All weekend it is doing a VMware migration from 6.5 to 6.7 on two hosts, not a cluster. Should be SO simple.
As this is VMware, it's over 150 hours of engineering time already. VMware support had to be engaged as we hit a bug in VMware's code that they didn't patch and doesn't get hit very often and it took them hours to figure out once they were engaged.
VMware is a train wreck. If we were doing this on ProxMox, this entire process would have been fifteen minutes, for real.
And we have a green zone. There's no attempt to do this online. This is a powered down process, and VMware can't do it.
Ouch - That doesn't offer much confidence.
Nothing about my real world experience with VMware inspires confidence. Nearly every deployment seems to be done based on emotions or confusion (you mean there are other options? but I've seen ads for this? but it is expensive, it must be good?) so the starting point is bad. And every deployment seems to need to bring in specialized outside help because nobody can manage it on their own. Every aspect of it is 100x harder than with every other product out there. People act like it is easy or well known, but how can every IT shop easily support KVM, Xen or HyperV, but we always have to get brought in as VMware specialists because no one can run patches reliably on ESXi?
Before ESX 7.0.3, I can count the number of times I had to call VMswear for support on one hand.... Heck, one finger. They seriously screwed the pooch on 7.0.3. We had to open several tickets with them about new issues.
They change the driver name for an intel NIC... but didn't check the depenency chain and update those to look to the new driver too. So that causes problems installing things like... Security patches. Go VMswear!
After we got past that hurdle, at some point on the 7.0 branch of ESX, we started seeing file locking issues where DRS would try to migrate a machine to a more suitable host -- which is fine... Except that if the VM is in the middle of a snapshot cleanup, the move will fail and the VM will power down and you can't get it back up until you reboot the original host it was on... Which in our environment here is not a bad thing, just aggravating.
So yeah, I'm not happy with recent editions of VMware. However, KVM and Proxmox (both personal setups) have worked beautifully! Proxmox makes KVM much easier.
-
@dafyre said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@gjacobse said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
All weekend it is doing a VMware migration from 6.5 to 6.7 on two hosts, not a cluster. Should be SO simple.
As this is VMware, it's over 150 hours of engineering time already. VMware support had to be engaged as we hit a bug in VMware's code that they didn't patch and doesn't get hit very often and it took them hours to figure out once they were engaged.
VMware is a train wreck. If we were doing this on ProxMox, this entire process would have been fifteen minutes, for real.
And we have a green zone. There's no attempt to do this online. This is a powered down process, and VMware can't do it.
Ouch - That doesn't offer much confidence.
Nothing about my real world experience with VMware inspires confidence. Nearly every deployment seems to be done based on emotions or confusion (you mean there are other options? but I've seen ads for this? but it is expensive, it must be good?) so the starting point is bad. And every deployment seems to need to bring in specialized outside help because nobody can manage it on their own. Every aspect of it is 100x harder than with every other product out there. People act like it is easy or well known, but how can every IT shop easily support KVM, Xen or HyperV, but we always have to get brought in as VMware specialists because no one can run patches reliably on ESXi?
Before ESX 7.0.3, I can count the number of times I had to call VMswear for support on one hand.... Heck, one finger. They seriously screwed the pooch on 7.0.3. We had to open several tickets with them about new issues.
They change the driver name for an intel NIC... but didn't check the depenency chain and update those to look to the new driver too. So that causes problems installing things like... Security patches. Go VMswear!
After we got past that hurdle, at some point on the 7.0 branch of ESX, we started seeing file locking issues where DRS would try to migrate a machine to a more suitable host -- which is fine... Except that if the VM is in the middle of a snapshot cleanup, the move will fail and the VM will power down and you can't get it back up until you reboot the original host it was on... Which in our environment here is not a bad thing, just aggravating.
So yeah, I'm not happy with recent editions of VMware. However, KVM and Proxmox (both personal setups) have worked beautifully! Proxmox makes KVM much easier.
The team has been working ALL weekend. Six engineers doing 10-12 hours a day. They've been going for 5+ hours already today. Finally after four days of 60-70 hours of engineering time per day, including Dell / VMware support involved, two simple 6.5 ESXi hosts non-clustered have now been updated to 6.7u3.
So that's about 250 hours of time, so far. The hosts are now up, but the VMs aren't back yet.
I don't understand how any company deploys VMware in this day and age. This is insanity. We told them 60 hours in that we could move them to KVM in a few hours. But they wanted to stay the course, which is fine. But wow. That moving to KVM is SO much easier & more reliable than staying on VMware is a big deal.
-
@dafyre said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Before ESX 7.0.3, I can count the number of times I had to call VMswear for support on one hand.... Heck, one finger. They seriously screwed the pooch on 7.0.3. We had to open several tickets with them about new issues.
This is all ESXi 6. The customer doesn't want to upgrade to 7. Jaja.
So this is, in theory, the "good" Vmware.
