@Reid-Cooper said:

@thecreativeone91 I thought that the HTML5 spec was going to have specific file and codec types specified. Was that dropped?

No. it just provides a way to present the video. It's up to the browser to support the codec. H.264 is the most common, but even then there are differnt types as it's a GOP codec there's I frames and P frames. where I frames are key frames and P frames are rendered by the computer as inbetween frames at the time of playback using a lot more cpu. All I frames take less cpu usage but are much bigger in size.

I use RubyMine daily now and love it. JetBrains makes some of my favourite stuff.

Yes. Though I thought it was pretty straightforward. The videos are pretty good for free, but the full price of $29 seems optimistic.

Some more info on why io.js decided to fork Node.js.

Care to share?

@Dashrender said:

@scottalanmiller said:

@Dashrender said:

No browser supports HTML5 completely correctly. Granted there are ones that do it better than others.

Partially because the final spec is just one day old. But in general, all HTML support is always just "really close." The closer the better, and that is what they generally compete over.

Agreed - and as we all know, until recently MS/IE just used to do their own thing, but now they seem to be at least trying to play better.

As far back as IE7 there has always been extra code snippets that will have to be added to deal with browser inconsistencies with HTML, XHTML and CSS. Most often MS was last to the party and only if you add proprietary coding.

@scottalanmiller said:

The new site is really looking awesome!

Hopefully all ok.

Email me, let me know please.

Thanks,

G 🙂

@scottalanmiller said:

Nothing is more confusing than the "Go" language.

As in DO NOT PASS ?? lol