@dashrender said in Using HTML5 Playback in Firefox on Fedora: @jaredbusch said in Using HTML5 Playback in Firefox on Fedora: If anyone is curious as to why these libraries are not in the native Fedora repository, it is due to licensing. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items well, I'd be more curious as to why they aren't included with FF. But as you already told me privately, it's a conflict of license types. Yep, just because two different pieces of software are both open source, doesn't mean the licenses work together. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_and_open-source_software_licenses

@mattbagan Fedora kimchi-2.5.0-0.fc25.noarch.rpm wok-2.5.0-0.fc25.noarch.rpm

@scottalanmiller said in HTML5 management interface for KVM: Calligra was always okay. Not great, but certainly not bad. That is atrocious

Received a few emails from Mozilla myself, about Mozilla Thimble - sadly, only watched the videos so far, but, does look good so far.

http://www.cnet.com/news/12-organizations-say-vp8-infringes-patents

Yes. Though I thought it was pretty straightforward. The videos are pretty good for free, but the full price of $29 seems optimistic.

@Dashrender said: @scottalanmiller said: @Dashrender said: No browser supports HTML5 completely correctly. Granted there are ones that do it better than others. Partially because the final spec is just one day old. But in general, all HTML support is always just "really close." The closer the better, and that is what they generally compete over. Agreed - and as we all know, until recently MS/IE just used to do their own thing, but now they seem to be at least trying to play better. As far back as IE7 there has always been extra code snippets that will have to be added to deal with browser inconsistencies with HTML, XHTML and CSS. Most often MS was last to the party and only if you add proprietary coding.