ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Testing oVirt...

    IT Discussion
    ovirt supermicro red hat virtualization kvm gluster hyperconverged centos7
    21
    339
    52.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee @Francesco Provino
      last edited by FATeknollogee

      @francesco-provino This is a 3 + 1 node hyperconverged cluster with Gluster, HA, Live Migration etc!

      stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • Emad RE
        Emad R @FATeknollogee
        last edited by

        @fateknollogee

        Very good more pics and stuff please, did you face any hosts disconnections I faced that alot

        FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stacksofplatesS
          stacksofplates @FATeknollogee
          last edited by

          @fateknollogee said in Testing oVirt...:

          @francesco-provino This is a 3 + 1 node hyperconverged cluster with Gluster, HA, Live Migration etc!

          That's what I was wondering. I didn't know if it was a self hosted engine (couldn't think of the name last night) or multiple node setup.

          FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • FATeknollogeeF
            FATeknollogee @stacksofplates
            last edited by

            @stacksofplates said in Testing oVirt...:

            @fateknollogee said in Testing oVirt...:

            @francesco-provino This is a 3 + 1 node hyperconverged cluster with Gluster, HA, Live Migration etc!

            That's what I was wondering. I didn't know if it was a self hosted engine (couldn't think of the name last night) or multiple node setup.

            This setup uses the Hosted Engine.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • FATeknollogeeF
              FATeknollogee @Emad R
              last edited by

              @emad-r said in Testing oVirt...:

              @fateknollogee

              Very good more pics and stuff please, did you face any hosts disconnections I faced that alot

              No host disconnections at all.
              The current version (4.2.5) is very easy to setup.
              I will post some pics of an upcoming version, oVirt Node (4.3) based on Fedora 28.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • FATeknollogeeF
                FATeknollogee
                last edited by

                oVirt Node v4.3 (based on Fedora 28) - this is pre-release:

                0_1533637604798_gluster_deployment.png

                0_1533637615089_step2_fqdns.png

                0_1533637623806_step3_packages.png

                0_1533637637986_step4_volumes.png

                0_1533637646286_step5_bricks.png

                0_1533637654853_step5_bricks_2.png

                0_1533637662108_step6_review.png

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • DustinB3403D
                  DustinB3403
                  last edited by

                  So you're saying ovirt is pushing the Xen guys to get into gear as this appears to be the entire package, with FOSS.

                  FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • FATeknollogeeF
                    FATeknollogee @DustinB3403
                    last edited by FATeknollogee

                    @dustinb3403 said in Testing oVirt...:

                    So you're saying ovirt is pushing the Xen guys to get into gear as this appears to be the entire package, with FOSS.

                    I believe oVirt is being billed as "vSphere for FOSS"

                    You're probably not going to move the Xen/XS/XCP-ng guys off their spot.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • dafyreD
                      dafyre
                      last edited by

                      Can we use the oVirt system to manage an existing KVM server?
                      ( I want to try oVirt, but really don't want to wipe out the system I currently have set up )

                      DustinB3403D FATeknollogeeF 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • DustinB3403D
                        DustinB3403 @dafyre
                        last edited by

                        @dafyre said in Testing oVirt...:

                        Can we use the oVirt system to manage an existing KVM server?
                        ( I want to try oVirt, but really don't want to wipe out the system I currently have set up )

                        I tried setting up oVirt a few versions ago and from what I could find, it's almost expected you have a minimum of 3 physical hosts for it.

                        So no, you won't be able to manage a standalone KVM server since everything has to get built to be managed by the oVirt Engine.

                        FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                        • FATeknollogeeF
                          FATeknollogee @dafyre
                          last edited by

                          @dafyre said in Testing oVirt...:

                          Can we use the oVirt system to manage an existing KVM server?
                          ( I want to try oVirt, but really don't want to wipe out the system I currently have set up )

                          Unfortunately not.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • Emad RE
                            Emad R @FATeknollogee
                            last edited by

                            @fateknollogee

                            Let us talk about Gluster, how do you feel safe with it ?

                            saw you choose an option with RAID 6, i dont get that cause from my trial, I make RAID and group disks then create Gluster volume from those mdraid volume, but it seems you did RAID 6 afterwards, hmm whats the logic behind that ?

                            What type of Gluster volume are you using, just distributed ?

                            I m still learning HCI so thus the beginner vibe

                            FATeknollogeeF travisdh1T scottalanmillerS 5 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Emad RE
                              Emad R @Francesco Provino
                              last edited by

                              @francesco-provino said in Testing oVirt...:

                              Any real advantage vs plain KVM?

                              Scaling KVM basically, if you have 1 or 2 KVM servers thats fine, but if you want more you need better management that logging in each one.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • FATeknollogeeF
                                FATeknollogee @Emad R
                                last edited by

                                @emad-r said in Testing oVirt...:

                                @fateknollogee

                                Let us talk about Gluster, how do you feel safe with it ?

                                saw you choose an option with RAID 6, i dont get that cause from my trial, I make RAID and group disks then create Gluster volume from those mdraid volume, but it seems you did RAID 6 afterwards, hmm whats the logic behind that ?

                                What type of Gluster volume are you using, just distributed ?

                                I m still learning HCI so thus the beginner vibe

                                No RAID6, I'm using RAID10.

                                Gluster volume is Replicate + Arbiter

                                This is a good blog post to get you started: https://www.ovirt.org/blog/2018/02/up-and-running-with-ovirt-4-2-and-gluster-storage/

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • FATeknollogeeF
                                  FATeknollogee @DustinB3403
                                  last edited by

                                  @dustinb3403 said in Testing oVirt...:

                                  @dafyre said in Testing oVirt...:

                                  Can we use the oVirt system to manage an existing KVM server?
                                  ( I want to try oVirt, but really don't want to wipe out the system I currently have set up )

                                  I tried setting up oVirt a few versions ago and from what I could find, it's almost expected you have a minimum of 3 physical hosts for it.

                                  So no, you won't be able to manage a standalone KVM server since everything has to get built to be managed by the oVirt Engine.

                                  You can now do a single host w Gluster:
                                  https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/gluster-hyperconverged/chap-Single_node_hyperconverged/

                                  Here's a screenshot of my single node install:
                                  0_1533646725168_screenshot_27.png

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • FATeknollogeeF
                                    FATeknollogee @Emad R
                                    last edited by

                                    @emad-r said in Testing oVirt...:

                                    @fateknollogee

                                    Let us talk about Gluster, how do you feel safe with it ?

                                    Not sure, since I'm new to the whole Gluster concept.

                                    saw you choose an option with RAID 6, i dont get that cause from my trial, I make RAID and group disks then create Gluster volume from those mdraid volume, but it seems you did RAID 6 afterwards, hmm whats the logic behind that ?

                                    Hardware RAID is recommended instead of MDADM.

                                    DustinB3403D scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DustinB3403D
                                      DustinB3403 @FATeknollogee
                                      last edited by

                                      @fateknollogee Hardware RAID is recommended because a lot of people lack the practice and skill with software RAID to appropriately maintain/troubleshoot/fix software raid.

                                      Plus you often get features like Blind swap.

                                      FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • FATeknollogeeF
                                        FATeknollogee @DustinB3403
                                        last edited by

                                        @dustinb3403 said in Testing oVirt...:

                                        @fateknollogee Hardware RAID is recommended because a lot of people lack the practice and skill with software RAID to appropriately maintain/troubleshoot/fix software raid.

                                        Plus you often get features like Blind swap.

                                        Nope...
                                        The folks at RH say, currently, performance is better with HW RAID & that is how most of their testing/validation is done.

                                        DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • DustinB3403D
                                          DustinB3403 @FATeknollogee
                                          last edited by

                                          @fateknollogee said in Testing oVirt...:

                                          @dustinb3403 said in Testing oVirt...:

                                          @fateknollogee Hardware RAID is recommended because a lot of people lack the practice and skill with software RAID to appropriately maintain/troubleshoot/fix software raid.

                                          Plus you often get features like Blind swap.

                                          Nope...
                                          The folks at RH say, currently, performance is better with HW RAID & that is how most of their testing/validation is done.

                                          That's odd, but okay. I would generally think they make the recommendation because they know there is a huge lack of understanding on how software raid needs to be managed.

                                          stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • travisdh1T
                                            travisdh1 @Emad R
                                            last edited by travisdh1

                                            @emad-r said in Testing oVirt...:

                                            @fateknollogee

                                            Let us talk about Gluster, how do you feel safe with it ?

                                            I'm guessing you really don't know much about Gluster and it's history?
                                            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluster

                                            Think of it like RAID, but spread over a network instead of locally. It's been around since 2005, and is used by some very large cloud providers today.

                                            So I feel totally safe with it, and actually deployed it once. Great platform when it's needed, and a complete waste of time when it's not.

                                            dafyreD scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 16
                                            • 17
                                            • 2 / 17
                                            • First post
                                              Last post