I can't even
-
@black3dynamite said in I can't even:
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
@brandon220 said in I can't even:
@momurda Yes, I forgot about FreeNAS. I see that a lot too. Especially in /r/homelab.
That's been an ongoing thing, though. It's a consistent bad bit of advice.
What your opinion on OpenMediaVault? The WebUI is pretty nice.
Looks like just another one of these endless "Web GUI for basic UNIX functions" products. A quick look at it, I don't see that it does anything special. The first question is... what's the itch looking to be scratched? From just looking at it, I don't see what would make it interesting.
-
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
@black3dynamite said in I can't even:
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
@brandon220 said in I can't even:
@momurda Yes, I forgot about FreeNAS. I see that a lot too. Especially in /r/homelab.
That's been an ongoing thing, though. It's a consistent bad bit of advice.
What your opinion on OpenMediaVault? The WebUI is pretty nice.
Looks like just another one of these endless "Web GUI for basic UNIX functions" products. A quick look at it, I don't see that it does anything special. The first question is... what's the itch looking to be scratched? From just looking at it, I don't see what would make it interesting.
Besides FreeNAS, NAS4Free, and so on, what else would you considered “Web GUI for basic Unix functions”?
-
@black3dynamite said in I can't even:
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
@black3dynamite said in I can't even:
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
@brandon220 said in I can't even:
@momurda Yes, I forgot about FreeNAS. I see that a lot too. Especially in /r/homelab.
That's been an ongoing thing, though. It's a consistent bad bit of advice.
What your opinion on OpenMediaVault? The WebUI is pretty nice.
Looks like just another one of these endless "Web GUI for basic UNIX functions" products. A quick look at it, I don't see that it does anything special. The first question is... what's the itch looking to be scratched? From just looking at it, I don't see what would make it interesting.
Besides FreeNAS, NAS4Free, and so on, what else would you considered “Web GUI for basic Unix functions”?
unRAID, OpenFiler, there are loads. Most are tiny projects that fail because it's not a product category with a need and it really only targets the consumer space where there is no money. So these projects tend to pop up often, and disappear pretty often as well. Or limp for a long time with just one or two people trying to make it happen. FreeNAS is pretty unique in having taken off to the degree that they have, and they can't make a reliable or useful product.
-
-
@jaredbusch said in I can't even:
"The Cisco."
-
-
@eddiejennings said in I can't even:
@jaredbusch said in I can't even:
"The Cisco."
I cropped my quote to exclude the model number, because it is not relevant..
-
@jaredbusch said in I can't even:
@eddiejennings said in I can't even:
@jaredbusch said in I can't even:
"The Cisco."
I cropped my quote to exclude the model number, because it is not relevant..
Glad you did. Made it more funny.
-
@eddiejennings said in I can't even:
@jaredbusch said in I can't even:
"The Cisco."
DS9 just got dropped.
-
FFS!
Help me spec out a server to run ESXi and 6 VM's with ram room to grow.
How about provide some details, rather than us wanting to drown you in gravy!
-
-
-
Clearly has no idea how to write software. This question makes no sense if he had any idea what he was asking. How does anything he mentioned play into his question?
-
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
Clearly has no idea how to write software. This question makes no sense if he had any idea what he was asking. How does anything he mentioned play into his question?
Reminds me of users who give me a 5 minute life-story of irrelevant information when describing their problem.
-
@eddiejennings said in I can't even:
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
Clearly has no idea how to write software. This question makes no sense if he had any idea what he was asking. How does anything he mentioned play into his question?
Reminds me of users who give me a 5 minute life-story of irrelevant information when describing their problem.
I can't stand people who won't stop talking long enough for me to tell them how to fix their problem.
-
-
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
Will 45 users sharing a normal desktop be fast?
LOL
ROFL. Wow.
-
Having dealt with RDSH and understanding multipoint server I dont know why Microsoft insists on using these USB terminals.
RDSH would be much more ideal, running in the cloud. But 16Gb of RAM is only good for 10 to 15 every day users, from what I have experienced. He would need 64GB of RAM and hella good SSD disk configuration for the i/o.
The CPU share does amazingly well.
But yeah he is looking for a miracle. The more chrome/web/video you do the more demand on the system as well.
-
@bigbear said in I can't even:
Having dealt with RDSH and understanding multipoint server I dont know why Microsoft insists on using these USB terminals.
Because they are the point of it. The idea is to be silly and physically limited so that making it cheap makes sense..
-
@bigbear said in I can't even:
RDSH would be much more ideal, running in the cloud. But 16Gb of RAM is only good for 10 to 15 every day users, from what I have experienced. He would need 64GB of RAM and hella good SSD disk configuration for the i/o.
That's the thing, if it worked well, they couldn't sell it so cheaply.
