ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Non-IT News Thread

    Water Closet
    91
    11.2k
    5.4m
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      I'm not saying anything against him. I consume more caffeine than that. But the quote was BS. You can't say that I'm anti drugs given my coffee consumption.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DustinB3403D
        DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

        @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

        @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

        @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

        @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

        So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...

        http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/excessive-caffeine-led-to-death-of-midlands-teen-coroner-says/439888018

        Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).

        That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.

        You're splitting hairs here.

        A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).

        My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.

        He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.

        Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
          last edited by

          @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

          @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

          @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

          @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

          @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

          @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

          So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...

          http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/excessive-caffeine-led-to-death-of-midlands-teen-coroner-says/439888018

          Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).

          That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.

          You're splitting hairs here.

          A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).

          My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.

          He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.

          Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.

          Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.

          DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            Go team elephant.

            Zimbabwe hunter 'crushed to death by shot elephant'
            http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-39996592

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • RojoLocoR
              RojoLoco @DustinB3403
              last edited by

              @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

              @travisdh1 What does the history of an agency have to do with the products consumed and sold as food.

              Caffeinated drinks are not a controlled or monitored substance. The kid obviously had an issue, consumed to many and died from a bad ticker.

              If he had used that illegal, evil, devil weed he'd still be alive. Legal, unregulated drugs kill. Caffeine is waaaaaaaaaaay more dangerous than THC. So are Tylenol, Viagra, and most other over the counter "drugs". This country's laws are so fucked it's not even funny.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • DustinB3403D
                DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...

                http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/excessive-caffeine-led-to-death-of-midlands-teen-coroner-says/439888018

                Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).

                That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.

                You're splitting hairs here.

                A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).

                My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.

                He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.

                Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.

                Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.

                And so are all of the chemicals in literally everything.

                RojoLocoR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • RojoLocoR
                  RojoLoco @DustinB3403
                  last edited by

                  @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                  @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                  @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                  @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                  @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                  @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                  @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                  @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                  So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...

                  http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/excessive-caffeine-led-to-death-of-midlands-teen-coroner-says/439888018

                  Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).

                  That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.

                  You're splitting hairs here.

                  A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).

                  My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.

                  He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.

                  Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.

                  Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.

                  And so are all of the chemicals in literally everything.

                  0_1495482249309_serotonin-and-dopamine.gif

                  DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • DustinB3403D
                    DustinB3403 @RojoLoco
                    last edited by

                    @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                    @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                    @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                    @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                    @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                    @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                    @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                    @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                    @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                    So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...

                    http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/excessive-caffeine-led-to-death-of-midlands-teen-coroner-says/439888018

                    Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).

                    That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.

                    You're splitting hairs here.

                    A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).

                    My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.

                    He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.

                    Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.

                    Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.

                    And so are all of the chemicals in literally everything.

                    0_1495482249309_serotonin-and-dopamine.gif

                    If we could suck serotonin and dopamine out of water does anyone think we'd bother with anything else.

                    RojoLocoR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • RojoLocoR
                      RojoLoco @DustinB3403
                      last edited by

                      @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                      @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                      @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                      @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                      @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                      @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                      @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                      @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                      @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                      @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                      So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...

                      http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/excessive-caffeine-led-to-death-of-midlands-teen-coroner-says/439888018

                      Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).

                      That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.

                      You're splitting hairs here.

                      A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).

                      My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.

                      He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.

                      Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.

                      Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.

                      And so are all of the chemicals in literally everything.

                      0_1495482249309_serotonin-and-dopamine.gif

                      If we could suck serotonin and dopamine out of water does anyone think we'd bother with anything else.

                      If I had vials of liquid serotonin and dopamine, I would inject them straight into my eyeball if necessary. That would save a lot of unnecessary steps and calories.

                      DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                      • DustinB3403D
                        DustinB3403 @RojoLoco
                        last edited by

                        @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                        @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                        @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                        @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                        @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                        @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                        @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                        So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...

                        http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/excessive-caffeine-led-to-death-of-midlands-teen-coroner-says/439888018

                        Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).

                        That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.

                        You're splitting hairs here.

                        A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).

                        My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.

                        He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.

                        Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.

                        Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.

                        And so are all of the chemicals in literally everything.

                        0_1495482249309_serotonin-and-dopamine.gif

                        If we could suck serotonin and dopamine out of water does anyone think we'd bother with anything else.

                        If I had vials of liquid serotonin and dopamine, I would inject them straight into my eyeball if necessary. That would save a lot of unnecessary steps and calories.

                        well damn... funny but damn.

                        RojoLocoR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • RojoLocoR
                          RojoLoco @DustinB3403
                          last edited by

                          @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                          @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                          @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                          @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                          @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                          @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                          @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                          @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                          @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                          @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                          @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                          @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                          So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...

                          http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/excessive-caffeine-led-to-death-of-midlands-teen-coroner-says/439888018

                          Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).

                          That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.

                          You're splitting hairs here.

                          A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).

                          My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.

                          He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.

                          Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.

                          Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.

                          And so are all of the chemicals in literally everything.

                          0_1495482249309_serotonin-and-dopamine.gif

                          If we could suck serotonin and dopamine out of water does anyone think we'd bother with anything else.

                          If I had vials of liquid serotonin and dopamine, I would inject them straight into my eyeball if necessary. That would save a lot of unnecessary steps and calories.

                          well damn... funny but damn.

                          Why bother with the stuff that "makes me happy" if I had the happy juice at the ready?

                          DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • DustinB3403D
                            DustinB3403 @RojoLoco
                            last edited by

                            @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                            @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                            @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                            @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                            @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                            @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                            @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                            @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                            @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                            @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                            @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                            @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                            @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                            So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...

                            http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/excessive-caffeine-led-to-death-of-midlands-teen-coroner-says/439888018

                            Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).

                            That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.

                            You're splitting hairs here.

                            A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).

                            My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.

                            He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.

                            Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.

                            Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.

                            And so are all of the chemicals in literally everything.

                            0_1495482249309_serotonin-and-dopamine.gif

                            If we could suck serotonin and dopamine out of water does anyone think we'd bother with anything else.

                            If I had vials of liquid serotonin and dopamine, I would inject them straight into my eyeball if necessary. That would save a lot of unnecessary steps and calories.

                            well damn... funny but damn.

                            Why bother with the stuff that "makes me happy" if I had the happy juice at the ready?

                            Technically you do... its getting your body to release those chemicals at will . .

                            RojoLocoR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • RojoLocoR
                              RojoLoco @DustinB3403
                              last edited by

                              @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                              @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                              @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                              @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                              @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                              @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                              @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                              @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                              @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                              @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                              @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                              @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                              @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                              @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                              So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...

                              http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/excessive-caffeine-led-to-death-of-midlands-teen-coroner-says/439888018

                              Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).

                              That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.

                              You're splitting hairs here.

                              A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).

                              My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.

                              He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.

                              Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.

                              Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.

                              And so are all of the chemicals in literally everything.

                              0_1495482249309_serotonin-and-dopamine.gif

                              If we could suck serotonin and dopamine out of water does anyone think we'd bother with anything else.

                              If I had vials of liquid serotonin and dopamine, I would inject them straight into my eyeball if necessary. That would save a lot of unnecessary steps and calories.

                              well damn... funny but damn.

                              Why bother with the stuff that "makes me happy" if I had the happy juice at the ready?

                              Technically you do... its getting your body to release those chemicals at will . .

                              Maybe you do. Not everyone's brains make all the neurotransmitters they need. I'll take those vials of happy juice now.

                              dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                              • dafyreD
                                dafyre @RojoLoco
                                last edited by

                                @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...

                                http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/excessive-caffeine-led-to-death-of-midlands-teen-coroner-says/439888018

                                Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).

                                That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.

                                You're splitting hairs here.

                                A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).

                                My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.

                                He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.

                                Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.

                                Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.

                                And so are all of the chemicals in literally everything.

                                0_1495482249309_serotonin-and-dopamine.gif

                                If we could suck serotonin and dopamine out of water does anyone think we'd bother with anything else.

                                If I had vials of liquid serotonin and dopamine, I would inject them straight into my eyeball if necessary. That would save a lot of unnecessary steps and calories.

                                well damn... funny but damn.

                                Why bother with the stuff that "makes me happy" if I had the happy juice at the ready?

                                Technically you do... its getting your body to release those chemicals at will . .

                                Maybe you do. Not everyone's brains make all the neurotransmitters they need. I'll take those vials of happy juice now.

                                I'll take a few for me, and a few for my wife as well... I won't need mine very often. I'm a happy guy. *smashes computer with baseball bat*.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  Manchester Arena blast: 19 dead and about 50 hurt
                                  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-40007886

                                  NattNattN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • NattNattN
                                    NattNatt @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller up to 22 dead and 59 injured now

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      Sir Roger Moore, James Bond actor, dies aged 89
                                      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-40018422

                                      gjacobseG wirestyle22W 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • gjacobseG
                                        gjacobse @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                        Sir Roger Moore, James Bond actor, dies aged 89
                                        http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-40018422

                                        @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                        Sir Roger Moore, James Bond actor, dies aged 89
                                        http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-40018422

                                        Just saw that... another banging year for iconic people passing on.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • wirestyle22W
                                          wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                          Sir Roger Moore, James Bond actor, dies aged 89
                                          http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-40018422

                                          I'm so butthurt right now

                                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @wirestyle22
                                            last edited by

                                            @wirestyle22 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                            @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                            Sir Roger Moore, James Bond actor, dies aged 89
                                            http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-40018422

                                            I'm so butthurt right now

                                            0_1495551739595_lald4.jpg

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 207
                                            • 208
                                            • 209
                                            • 210
                                            • 211
                                            • 560
                                            • 561
                                            • 209 / 561
                                            • First post
                                              Last post