ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    SATA vs NL-SAS vs SAS For New Array

    IT Discussion
    10
    54
    11.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JaredBuschJ
      JaredBusch @BRRABill
      last edited by

      @BRRABill said:

      @John-Nicholson said:

      @BRRABill It is also CRAZY slow (like Low latency tape is what we call it). Useless for most workloads without a large cache in front of it.

      Then how is it so many people here are using it for their servers?

      Perspective. I believe @John-Nicholson works ina large place running tons of workloads on each host.

      DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • DashrenderD
        Dashrender @StorageNinja
        last edited by

        @John-Nicholson said:

        With De-duplication and Compression and RAID 5/6 Flash drives are cheaper than 10K RPM drives. We did the price comparisons with VSAN 6.2 came out and 10K is officially "dead" unless all your data is encrypted or something.

        What are you using for De-Dup and compression? Is that something native in hypervisors now? if not, it adds to the cost column.

        PSX_DefectorP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DashrenderD
          Dashrender @JaredBusch
          last edited by

          @JaredBusch said:

          @BRRABill said:

          @John-Nicholson said:

          @BRRABill It is also CRAZY slow (like Low latency tape is what we call it). Useless for most workloads without a large cache in front of it.

          Then how is it so many people here are using it for their servers?

          Perspective. I believe @John-Nicholson works ina large place running tons of workloads on each host.

          Agreed - HDD might be dead for large companies - big players, but SMB - we have at least a year left, maybe 2.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • PSX_DefectorP
            PSX_Defector @Dashrender
            last edited by PSX_Defector

            @Dashrender said:

            @John-Nicholson said:

            With De-duplication and Compression and RAID 5/6 Flash drives are cheaper than 10K RPM drives. We did the price comparisons with VSAN 6.2 came out and 10K is officially "dead" unless all your data is encrypted or something.

            What are you using for De-Dup and compression? Is that something native in hypervisors now? if not, it adds to the cost column.

            There's dedupe in Win2K12 at the OS level, assuming you are deduplicating NTFS file systems. If you are using encryption, that's the only way you will be able to dedupe data.

            We use Pure Storage SANs, which support native dedupe at the block level. And it appears that VSAN supports block level dedupe as well.

            https://blogs.vmware.com/virtualblocks/2016/02/10/whats-new-vmware-virtual-san-6-2/

            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DashrenderD
              Dashrender @PSX_Defector
              last edited by

              @PSX_Defector said:

              @Dashrender said:

              @John-Nicholson said:

              With De-duplication and Compression and RAID 5/6 Flash drives are cheaper than 10K RPM drives. We did the price comparisons with VSAN 6.2 came out and 10K is officially "dead" unless all your data is encrypted or something.

              What are you using for De-Dup and compression? Is that something native in hypervisors now? if not, it adds to the cost column.

              There's dedupe in Win2K12 at the OS level, assuming you are deduplicating NTFS file systems. If you are using encryption, that's the only way you will be able to dedupe data.

              We use Pure Storage SANs, which support native dedupe at the block level. And it appears that VSAN supports block level dedupe as well.

              https://blogs.vmware.com/virtualblocks/2016/02/10/whats-new-vmware-virtual-san-6-2/

              Well, you're paying a LOT for those hardware platform - so at that point the extra space gained makes the SSD definitely more worthwhile performance wise. But not many SMB's are dealing with those things.

              PSX_DefectorP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • PSX_DefectorP
                PSX_Defector @Dashrender
                last edited by

                @Dashrender said:

                @PSX_Defector said:

                @Dashrender said:

                @John-Nicholson said:

                With De-duplication and Compression and RAID 5/6 Flash drives are cheaper than 10K RPM drives. We did the price comparisons with VSAN 6.2 came out and 10K is officially "dead" unless all your data is encrypted or something.

                What are you using for De-Dup and compression? Is that something native in hypervisors now? if not, it adds to the cost column.

                There's dedupe in Win2K12 at the OS level, assuming you are deduplicating NTFS file systems. If you are using encryption, that's the only way you will be able to dedupe data.

                We use Pure Storage SANs, which support native dedupe at the block level. And it appears that VSAN supports block level dedupe as well.

                https://blogs.vmware.com/virtualblocks/2016/02/10/whats-new-vmware-virtual-san-6-2/

                Well, you're paying a LOT for those hardware platform - so at that point the extra space gained makes the SSD definitely more worthwhile performance wise. But not many SMB's are dealing with those things.

                Which is very true. I work for a multi-tenant environment, so it's worth a few bucks to get the performance edge on those things. Dedupe is just an added bonus.

                Which also brings up the fact that one should be hosting with us! We have the hardware one can only dream about. Why try to keep up when you can spend the cash on hosting which will take care of all of that for you?

                travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • travisdh1T
                  travisdh1 @PSX_Defector
                  last edited by

                  @PSX_Defector said:

                  @Dashrender said:

                  @PSX_Defector said:

                  @Dashrender said:

                  @John-Nicholson said:

                  With De-duplication and Compression and RAID 5/6 Flash drives are cheaper than 10K RPM drives. We did the price comparisons with VSAN 6.2 came out and 10K is officially "dead" unless all your data is encrypted or something.

                  What are you using for De-Dup and compression? Is that something native in hypervisors now? if not, it adds to the cost column.

                  There's dedupe in Win2K12 at the OS level, assuming you are deduplicating NTFS file systems. If you are using encryption, that's the only way you will be able to dedupe data.

                  We use Pure Storage SANs, which support native dedupe at the block level. And it appears that VSAN supports block level dedupe as well.

                  https://blogs.vmware.com/virtualblocks/2016/02/10/whats-new-vmware-virtual-san-6-2/

                  Well, you're paying a LOT for those hardware platform - so at that point the extra space gained makes the SSD definitely more worthwhile performance wise. But not many SMB's are dealing with those things.

                  Which is very true. I work for a multi-tenant environment, so it's worth a few bucks to get the performance edge on those things. Dedupe is just an added bonus.

                  Which also brings up the fact that one should be hosting with us! We have the hardware one can only dream about. Why try to keep up when you can spend the cash on hosting which will take care of all of that for you?

                  Which is what company? The profile here doesn't say, and it's kinda silly to not get a good self-promotion in with that!

                  PSX_DefectorP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @BRRABill
                    last edited by

                    @BRRABill said:

                    I guess my thinking was faster is always better.

                    If money was not an object, would this be true?

                    Money is always an object 🙂

                    Reliability and capacity are big deals too. Most people see those as the biggest factors.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      SSDs are almost always just for database servers. Things like applications servers and AD DCs really never touch the disk and things like email and file servers often can't leverage the SSD IOPS for pushes files to clients.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • PSX_DefectorP
                        PSX_Defector @travisdh1
                        last edited by

                        @travisdh1 said:

                        @PSX_Defector said:

                        @Dashrender said:

                        @PSX_Defector said:

                        @Dashrender said:

                        @John-Nicholson said:

                        With De-duplication and Compression and RAID 5/6 Flash drives are cheaper than 10K RPM drives. We did the price comparisons with VSAN 6.2 came out and 10K is officially "dead" unless all your data is encrypted or something.

                        What are you using for De-Dup and compression? Is that something native in hypervisors now? if not, it adds to the cost column.

                        There's dedupe in Win2K12 at the OS level, assuming you are deduplicating NTFS file systems. If you are using encryption, that's the only way you will be able to dedupe data.

                        We use Pure Storage SANs, which support native dedupe at the block level. And it appears that VSAN supports block level dedupe as well.

                        https://blogs.vmware.com/virtualblocks/2016/02/10/whats-new-vmware-virtual-san-6-2/

                        Well, you're paying a LOT for those hardware platform - so at that point the extra space gained makes the SSD definitely more worthwhile performance wise. But not many SMB's are dealing with those things.

                        Which is very true. I work for a multi-tenant environment, so it's worth a few bucks to get the performance edge on those things. Dedupe is just an added bonus.

                        Which also brings up the fact that one should be hosting with us! We have the hardware one can only dream about. Why try to keep up when you can spend the cash on hosting which will take care of all of that for you?

                        Which is what company? The profile here doesn't say, and it's kinda silly to not get a good self-promotion in with that!

                        For various reasons, I don't mention who I work for, be it my previous employer Big Red V or my current one. Gotta maintain separation of professional and personal life.

                        Let's just say it's not Amazon, but if you follow cloud hosting, you would know who we are.

                        J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • MattSpellerM
                          MattSpeller @brianlittlejohn
                          last edited by

                          @brianlittlejohn said:

                          I run 7200 SATA almost everywhere...

                          Here as well, we are after space & price not speed

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            I see 7200 SATA very commonly. NL-SAS is becoming very popular as it is roughly identical in price these days and has a little performance boost, especially in virtualization scenarios.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • J
                              Jason Banned @PSX_Defector
                              last edited by

                              @PSX_Defector said:

                              @travisdh1 said:

                              @PSX_Defector said:

                              @Dashrender said:

                              @PSX_Defector said:

                              @Dashrender said:

                              @John-Nicholson said:

                              With De-duplication and Compression and RAID 5/6 Flash drives are cheaper than 10K RPM drives. We did the price comparisons with VSAN 6.2 came out and 10K is officially "dead" unless all your data is encrypted or something.

                              What are you using for De-Dup and compression? Is that something native in hypervisors now? if not, it adds to the cost column.

                              There's dedupe in Win2K12 at the OS level, assuming you are deduplicating NTFS file systems. If you are using encryption, that's the only way you will be able to dedupe data.

                              We use Pure Storage SANs, which support native dedupe at the block level. And it appears that VSAN supports block level dedupe as well.

                              https://blogs.vmware.com/virtualblocks/2016/02/10/whats-new-vmware-virtual-san-6-2/

                              Well, you're paying a LOT for those hardware platform - so at that point the extra space gained makes the SSD definitely more worthwhile performance wise. But not many SMB's are dealing with those things.

                              Which is very true. I work for a multi-tenant environment, so it's worth a few bucks to get the performance edge on those things. Dedupe is just an added bonus.

                              Which also brings up the fact that one should be hosting with us! We have the hardware one can only dream about. Why try to keep up when you can spend the cash on hosting which will take care of all of that for you?

                              Which is what company? The profile here doesn't say, and it's kinda silly to not get a good self-promotion in with that!

                              For various reasons, I don't mention who I work for, be it my previous employer Big Red V or my current one. Gotta maintain separation of professional and personal life.

                              Let's just say it's not Amazon, but if you follow cloud hosting, you would know who we are.

                              I thought you were still with the Big Red V?

                              PSX_DefectorP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • PSX_DefectorP
                                PSX_Defector @Jason
                                last edited by

                                @Jason said:

                                @PSX_Defector said:

                                @travisdh1 said:

                                @PSX_Defector said:

                                @Dashrender said:

                                @PSX_Defector said:

                                @Dashrender said:

                                @John-Nicholson said:

                                With De-duplication and Compression and RAID 5/6 Flash drives are cheaper than 10K RPM drives. We did the price comparisons with VSAN 6.2 came out and 10K is officially "dead" unless all your data is encrypted or something.

                                What are you using for De-Dup and compression? Is that something native in hypervisors now? if not, it adds to the cost column.

                                There's dedupe in Win2K12 at the OS level, assuming you are deduplicating NTFS file systems. If you are using encryption, that's the only way you will be able to dedupe data.

                                We use Pure Storage SANs, which support native dedupe at the block level. And it appears that VSAN supports block level dedupe as well.

                                https://blogs.vmware.com/virtualblocks/2016/02/10/whats-new-vmware-virtual-san-6-2/

                                Well, you're paying a LOT for those hardware platform - so at that point the extra space gained makes the SSD definitely more worthwhile performance wise. But not many SMB's are dealing with those things.

                                Which is very true. I work for a multi-tenant environment, so it's worth a few bucks to get the performance edge on those things. Dedupe is just an added bonus.

                                Which also brings up the fact that one should be hosting with us! We have the hardware one can only dream about. Why try to keep up when you can spend the cash on hosting which will take care of all of that for you?

                                Which is what company? The profile here doesn't say, and it's kinda silly to not get a good self-promotion in with that!

                                For various reasons, I don't mention who I work for, be it my previous employer Big Red V or my current one. Gotta maintain separation of professional and personal life.

                                Let's just say it's not Amazon, but if you follow cloud hosting, you would know who we are.

                                I thought you were still with the Big Red V?

                                Nope, they shitcanned three quarters of the US based staff last year. I walked out $10K richer, a new job in two days, and a pay raise.

                                If you are still hosting with them, flee as fast as your contract will allow you. They recently went through another round of shitcannings, this time it was management. They lost great people, and is no longer the same company I knew.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • BRRABillB
                                  BRRABill
                                  last edited by BRRABill

                                  The server I am looking to put these drives into has 3.5 inch bays, so I could use either 3.5 or 2.5 inch disks.

                                  Is there a preferred one to go with in this scenario? Or does size really not matter, so to speak? Is one preferred?

                                  Sometimes on xByte the 2.5 drive is cheaper than the 3.5 which is why I ask...

                                  MattSpellerM scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • MattSpellerM
                                    MattSpeller @BRRABill
                                    last edited by MattSpeller

                                    @BRRABill said:

                                    The server I am looking to put these drives into has 3.5 inch bays, so I could use either 3.5 or 2.5 inch disks.

                                    Is there a preferred one to go with in this scenario? Or does size really not matter, so to speak? Is one preferred?

                                    Sometimes on xByte the 2.5 drive is cheaper than the 3.5 which is why I ask...

                                    2.5 has faster seek because... well it sweeps less disk!
                                    2.5 is generally more $/GB
                                    2.5 generally uses less power
                                    2.5 @7200rpm is a pretty dang fast drive per $/GB

                                    3.5 comes in larger sizes
                                    3.5 comes in 15k rpm (2.5 used to come in 10k IIRC but they were rare)
                                    3.5 comes in "hybrid" SSD chunk added

                                    Specifically for your scenario I'd go 3.5 PURELY because 3.5 to 2.5 adapter thing-a-ma-whatsits can be expensive, rattle and fiddly.

                                    Were I spec'ing out a server I'd consider 2.5 for some scenarios.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • BRRABillB
                                      BRRABill
                                      last edited by BRRABill

                                      I priced out all the scenarios I am looking at.

                                      Basically, we only have about 300GB across our physical servers ATM, and I do not see it growing very quickly. Pretty sure I could get away with 900GB. The VMs on this server will be a file server, and a non-Exchange mail server (MDaemon). I've been watching the IOPS on the mail server, and they are pretty low.

                                      Here are the potential options. Do these numbers seem about right? They don't take into consideration any cache. (This server has a PERC 710.)

                                      Be curious to hear which way people would go if this was your server. Go for the most IOPS since storage isn't need? Go with a little extra storage and lower cost?

                                      0_1460737587842_drive-calcs.png

                                      MattSpellerM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • MattSpellerM
                                        MattSpeller @BRRABill
                                        last edited by MattSpeller

                                        @BRRABill I'd go the 500's in OBR10.... but.......

                                        You could get 3 cheap 960GB SSD for that money and RAID5 them....

                                        Also that seems like a lot for 500gb drives, $75 a pop? shrug

                                        travisdh1T BRRABillB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • travisdh1T
                                          travisdh1 @MattSpeller
                                          last edited by

                                          @BRRABill said:

                                          I priced out all the scenarios I am looking at.

                                          Basically, we only have about 300GB across our physical servers ATM, and I do not see it growing very quickly. Pretty sure I could get away with 900GB. The VMs on this server will be a file server, and a non-Exchange mail server (MDaemon). I've been watching the IOPS on the mail server, and they are pretty low.

                                          Here are the potential options. Do these numbers seem about right? They don't take into consideration any cache. (This server has a PERC 710.)

                                          Be curious to hear which way people would go if this was your server. Go for the most IOPS since storage isn't need? Go with a little extra storage and lower cost?

                                          0_1460737587842_drive-calcs.png

                                          Is that cost the total for all the drives that would be used?

                                          If IOPS needs are met, I'd go with less expensive. What would the need to spend more money be?

                                          @MattSpeller said:

                                          @BRRABill I'd go the 500's in OBR10.... but.......

                                          You could get 3 cheap 960GB SSD for that money and RAID5 them....

                                          Also that seems like a lot for 500gb drives, $75 a pop? shrug

                                          Depends, are we talking consumer or enterprise class drives at that $75 each?

                                          MattSpellerM BRRABillB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • MattSpellerM
                                            MattSpeller @travisdh1
                                            last edited by

                                            @travisdh1 said:

                                            Depends, are we talking consumer or enterprise class drives at that $75 each?

                                            He does not mention SAS so I was assuming 7200rpm SATA commodity disposable spinny rust.

                                            BRRABillB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 2 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post