Update:
I was able to get it working with a self-signed certificate and the functionality is great. I had NC connected to the OO server with https://localip That worked fine but once left my LAN, from the web it tried to resolve the local ip. That of course will not work and it does zero good to only work while you are on the LAN. I was unsuccessful at getting the self-signed cert to work behind nginx reverse proxy.
Is it possible to just have nginx forward http to the OO server and:

Allow Letsencrypt to verify and issue the certs Actually function behind the proxy if the actual cert is on the OO server directly. I cannot find any good documentation of OO working properly behind the reverse proxy in the normal sense.

It also reflects the mount in Cockpit as well.

@brandon220 said in Choosing KVM over Hyper-V....:

I have not tried to run a Windows vm on KVM yet....

KVM is specifically good for that.

@brandon220 said in DNS A record:

It had to be fixed by GoDaddy support. They cleared out the forwarder and all is well.
I need to look in to Cloudfare.

oh yeah, they are so good.

I'd normally keep swap space too but I know for sure you can run without it successfully because we used to do that with embedded linux for years - with devices that had years of uptime.

With memory ballooning you can overcommit RAM and the hypervisor can swap guest RAM to disk if it comes to that. I don't know which hypervisors supports it though. As always it depends on how much you want to cram out of your gear.

@brandon220 said in File sync and storage issue.:

I am going to assume that the SQL server would use webdav to get the files from NC to process them if they replaced the method now with NC or have the sync client on the server to pull the files into a local folder.

Reasonably, yes.

@Dashrender said in Access local share with MS Account:

@DustinB3403 said in Access local share with MS Account:

@brandon220 said in Access local share with MS Account:

@DustinB3403 I know it should work this way but it seems intermittent. That is what I am trying to verify. The remote user would need their username/password on the machine that is being accessed in order to grant them access. I cannot recall if i've ever set up a local account on a machine with MS credentials. Having everything in AD makes you forget all the nuances of a workgroup.

Just grant the [email protected] access to the share for the remote user's account.

That should be all you need to do.

really? all Microsoft accounts are [email protected] for the full account name?

It will be interesting to see what the OP comes back with.

not all, is whatever email they use for their Microsoft Account, it can be @yahoo.com or @outlook.com or any domain used.

I just did it. The guide still applies, apart from getting 15 and not 13.

@travisdh1 I thought that was the issue as well and temporarily disabled selinux and it did not fix my issue.

@brandon220 said in Nextcloud Version Control:

The main concern is if a file is overwritten, that it will actually retrieve a previous version of the file. I know the functionality is there. Just wondering if it functions as intended or has issues.

Yes, that's versioning in any form, and yes it has worked for us. I've never seen it fail.

@brrabill said in Nextcloud replacing OneDrive:

@scottalanmiller said in Nextcloud replacing OneDrive:

@brrabill said in Nextcloud replacing OneDrive:

Hmmm, sounds like one of those "MS messed up" scenarios we were discussing in the backup thread(s).

Yes, but it's also a "it didn't lose them their data" because they had local copies, scenarios we were also discussing. So a good example of both.

Actually it sounded like MS found them and put them back.

Local copies would also have been removed if they were "deleted" at the MS side.

Good point. The real problem here is the "customer shaming" that MS always does. Anytime MS is at fault, they try to shame the customer. Whether it is through official channels or "look the other way" as their engineers go into communities and do it. MS employees are out there attacking any customer that dares to mention that they've had a problem.

Like in this thread. Even once MS had admitted the mistake, and fixed it, an MS employee was still on the offensive trying to shame the customer and went ballistic once it was obvious he didn't even know how MS products worked.

@wrx7m said in SSO via LDAP:

@black3dynamite said in SSO via LDAP:

@wrx7m said in SSO via LDAP:

I am looking at doing this with another SSO provider; Okta is on the shortlist.

We've been using Okta and its been great.

Thanks for the mini review :grinning_face:

0_1530039980961_what can i say except you're welcome.gif

@jaredbusch I did the Net Install and minimal for the Fedora install and then added the virtualization packages.

I have no need for it at any current client. But it is something I am well aware of as an option.

@jaredbusch I will make the change later today. I would rather follow the best practices and methods. I have zero issues with that. It is definitely different than using POTS lines because that is what I was used to with legacy systems. I've learned a TON since first installing FreePBX last year. Wish I would have tried it a long time ago.

@dafyre it's a good one.

@brandon220 said in Using Vultr Apps for WordPress Hosting:

I just loaded one to do some testing. Don't plan on using it for production. I may use Bluehost or Vultr on Fedora. My main reason was to get familiar with a theme and see if I like it. Then, I can destroy the instance and make it permanent and with the correct underlying OS.

Works fine for that.

@brandon220 said in FreePBX and VOIP.MS:

I was reading on the voip.ms wiki and thought the way you all are describing is the way it should have been done. I just was unsure on how to implement. I will make the changes.

It's definitely a challenge coming from old POTS days, one line/connection = one phone number. It's definitely more like T1's, single connection, many DIDs.

@scottalanmiller said in Nextcloud scenario:

@black3dynamite said in Nextcloud scenario:

https://docs.nextcloud.com/server/12/admin_manual/maintenance/backup.html

Exactly. Nice and easy without imaging anything.

And with the help of salt or ansible to deploy Nextcloud, it’s even better.

@scottalanmiller said in Keeping track of customer's credentials, etc.:

@dbeato said in Keeping track of customer's credentials, etc.:

@jaredbusch said in Keeping track of customer's credentials, etc.:

e is no reason that a wiki that is secured properly is not valid for something like this.

How does that look like in a wiki?

User ACLs and securying the platform.

That's totally understandable, and I know where we are going on this.