ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Linux OS Thoughts?

    Water Closet
    windowstolinux linux linux desktop
    11
    63
    4.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DashrenderD
      Dashrender @WrCombs
      last edited by

      @WrCombs said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

      @Dashrender said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

      @scottalanmiller said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

      @WrCombs said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

      @IRJ said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

      Stick to LTS versions (...hides)

      what is LTS Versions vs. Bleeding Edge

      That's not a comparison. They are saying Bleeding Edge in an attempt to discredit "Current Releases." Bleeding edge is something wholly different.

      LTS: Long Term Support. These are OS releases that are selected (every major vendor does this... Windows, RHEL, Ubuntu, Suse, etc.) to get "support" for a really long time with a guarantee that the code versions won't change. It's a locked release that you can install and use and get "support" for a long time. I say "support" because it's not always what it sounds like. Ubuntu doesn't offer anything we'd call actual support for their LTS, it's all a marketing thing not a tech thing.

      Current Release: This is the current product release from a vendor. Windows, RH, Ubuntu, Suse all offer these. Windows, RH, and Ubuntu all have a ~6 month release cycle for current. Suse alone uses a rolling release model. None of these imply anything like cutting or bleeding edge, those terms would denote a misunderstanding of what releases are. A current release can easily include software that is decades old, nothing about it implies a faster release of packages. And if it did, Ubuntu LTS is also "Current" every 18 months, so if bleeding edge is bad, then their LTS is also bad because they would overlap.

      Current selections of both....

      Windows:
      LTS: Windows LTSB 1809
      Current: 1903

      Red Hat:
      LTS: CentOS 8 / RHEL 8
      Current: Fedora 30

      Ubuntu:
      LTS: 1804
      Current: 1910

      Suse:
      LTS: OpenSuse Leap
      Current: OpenSuse Tumbleweed

      Actually 1909 has been released officially.

      That's what I got on my new laptop.. weird.

      why is that weird?

      WrCombsW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • WrCombsW
        WrCombs @Dashrender
        last edited by

        @Dashrender said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

        @WrCombs said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

        @Dashrender said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

        @scottalanmiller said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

        @WrCombs said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

        @IRJ said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

        Stick to LTS versions (...hides)

        what is LTS Versions vs. Bleeding Edge

        That's not a comparison. They are saying Bleeding Edge in an attempt to discredit "Current Releases." Bleeding edge is something wholly different.

        LTS: Long Term Support. These are OS releases that are selected (every major vendor does this... Windows, RHEL, Ubuntu, Suse, etc.) to get "support" for a really long time with a guarantee that the code versions won't change. It's a locked release that you can install and use and get "support" for a long time. I say "support" because it's not always what it sounds like. Ubuntu doesn't offer anything we'd call actual support for their LTS, it's all a marketing thing not a tech thing.

        Current Release: This is the current product release from a vendor. Windows, RH, Ubuntu, Suse all offer these. Windows, RH, and Ubuntu all have a ~6 month release cycle for current. Suse alone uses a rolling release model. None of these imply anything like cutting or bleeding edge, those terms would denote a misunderstanding of what releases are. A current release can easily include software that is decades old, nothing about it implies a faster release of packages. And if it did, Ubuntu LTS is also "Current" every 18 months, so if bleeding edge is bad, then their LTS is also bad because they would overlap.

        Current selections of both....

        Windows:
        LTS: Windows LTSB 1809
        Current: 1903

        Red Hat:
        LTS: CentOS 8 / RHEL 8
        Current: Fedora 30

        Ubuntu:
        LTS: 1804
        Current: 1910

        Suse:
        LTS: OpenSuse Leap
        Current: OpenSuse Tumbleweed

        Actually 1909 has been released officially.

        That's what I got on my new laptop.. weird.

        why is that weird?

        cause i was just about to say that also.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DashrenderD
          Dashrender
          last edited by

          Back to the OP.

          @WrCombs wants to things most likely...

          a desktop environment to run in - So Fedora or Ubuntu most likely... and then a separate "server" box to install Linux Server OSes on to experiment with to do things like - setup FreePBX, setup NC, setup file server, etc.

          WrCombsW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • WrCombsW
            WrCombs @Dashrender
            last edited by

            @Dashrender said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

            Back to the OP.

            @WrCombs wants to things most likely...

            a desktop environment to run in - So Fedora or Ubuntu most likely... and then a separate "server" box to install Linux Server OSes on to experiment with to do things like - setup FreePBX, setup NC, setup file server, etc.

            yes.
            I could even VM those, right? or no? - Forgive the newbness, but I'm thinking a Desktop and then run a VM Boxes with server OS's to do what @Dashrender is saying and thoughts on which ones to try.

            DustinB3403D DashrenderD scottalanmillerS 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @WrCombs
              last edited by

              @WrCombs said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

              @Dashrender said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

              Back to the OP.

              @WrCombs wants to things most likely...

              a desktop environment to run in - So Fedora or Ubuntu most likely... and then a separate "server" box to install Linux Server OSes on to experiment with to do things like - setup FreePBX, setup NC, setup file server, etc.

              yes.
              I could even VM those, right? or no? - Forgive the newbness, but I'm thinking a Desktop and then run a VM Boxes with server OS's to do what @Dashrender is saying and thoughts on which ones to try.

              Boxes is weird, but yes. Throw Fedora or Ubuntu onto a laptop or desktop, install KVM, and virtualize anything that you want. You get a fully functional, and gorgeous desktop environment, but can test any server OS or alternative desktop OS that you like.

              WrCombsW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @black3dynamite
                last edited by

                @black3dynamite said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                Linux Distros ( Desktop/Laptop Use )
                Each distro that I'm listing provides a Live images.

                • Fedora
                  Fedora Workstation default desktop environment is GNOME and uses Wayland has the default display server with an option to use Xorg. If you want to install a different desktop environment and get the latest updates during installation, you will need to use the Netinstall image.

                • Ubuntu

                • Debian (Non-Free firmware)
                  Live
                  https://cdimage.debian.org/images/unofficial/non-free/images-including-firmware/10.1.0-live+nonfree/amd64/iso-hybrid/
                  Netinstall
                  https://cdimage.debian.org/images/unofficial/non-free/images-including-firmware/10.1.0+nonfree/amd64/iso-cd/

                • Linux Mint ( Based on Ubuntu LTS )
                  Cinnamon is their pride and joy desktop environment
                  KDE
                  XFCE

                • Elementary OS ( Based on Ubuntu LTS )
                  Elementary OS design layout looks similar to MacOS.

                And Deepin, and Solus.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • dafyreD
                  dafyre
                  last edited by

                  I saw a couple of mentions of Laptops... Ubuntu 19.10 supposedly ships with NVIDIA drivers that play nicely with the Intel+NVIDIA type graphics setups. I haven't tried this... yet... but I am definitely planning on it!

                  black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • notverypunnyN
                    notverypunny
                    last edited by

                    All depends on what you want to learn and how much breakage you're willing to deal with.

                    Everyone on here (myself included) is likely to have a certain bias for their own preferred flavor. Check out distrowatch if you haven't already done so for reviews and information on any of the suggestions offered.

                    Linux has come a long way from when I started using Slackware back around 2002. From there I went to Kubuntu, Sabayon, Mint and now Manjaro (Cinnamon) on desktop / laptops. Work has been mostly Ubuntu and Debian with some centos and centos-based products (xenserver) in the mix.

                    To come back to your question, it depends on whether you're looking to learn from a work-skills perspective or personal curiosity. If you want to do a real deep-dive you could do Linux from Scratch, Gentoo or Arch....

                    My personal recommendation (bias included) is to run Manjaro Cinnamon and use KVM or VirtualBox to experiment with other distros.
                    Reasons:

                    • Rolling release is awesome
                    • It's close to bleeding edge, but still very stable
                    • AUR is like PPAs but so much better.
                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • black3dynamiteB
                      black3dynamite @dafyre
                      last edited by

                      @dafyre said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                      I saw a couple of mentions of Laptops... Ubuntu 19.10 supposedly ships with NVIDIA drivers that play nicely with the Intel+NVIDIA type graphics setups. I haven't tried this... yet... but I am definitely planning on it!

                      Pop! OS is another too. They provide two different images, Intel/AMD and Nvidia.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • JaredBuschJ
                        JaredBusch
                        last edited by

                        The best thing is to run a full Linux desktop that makes every point and click the same as windows.

                        The point is to make the day to day tasks transparent in the change.

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
                        • WrCombsW
                          WrCombs @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                          @WrCombs said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                          @Dashrender said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                          Back to the OP.

                          @WrCombs wants to things most likely...

                          a desktop environment to run in - So Fedora or Ubuntu most likely... and then a separate "server" box to install Linux Server OSes on to experiment with to do things like - setup FreePBX, setup NC, setup file server, etc.

                          yes.
                          I could even VM those, right? or no? - Forgive the newbness, but I'm thinking a Desktop and then run a VM Boxes with server OS's to do what @Dashrender is saying and thoughts on which ones to try.

                          Boxes is weird, but yes. Throw Fedora or Ubuntu onto a laptop or desktop, install KVM, and virtualize anything that you want. You get a fully functional, and gorgeous desktop environment, but can test any server OS or alternative desktop OS that you like.

                          sounds like the likely chose..
                          I know they're out there; anyone got the link for the guides?

                          WrCombsW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • wirestyle22W
                            wirestyle22
                            last edited by wirestyle22

                            Fedora w/ Cinnamon for a desktop. Haven't found anything that really comes close.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • WrCombsW
                              WrCombs @WrCombs
                              last edited by

                              @WrCombs said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                              @scottalanmiller said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                              @WrCombs said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                              @Dashrender said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                              Back to the OP.

                              @WrCombs wants to things most likely...

                              a desktop environment to run in - So Fedora or Ubuntu most likely... and then a separate "server" box to install Linux Server OSes on to experiment with to do things like - setup FreePBX, setup NC, setup file server, etc.

                              yes.
                              I could even VM those, right? or no? - Forgive the newbness, but I'm thinking a Desktop and then run a VM Boxes with server OS's to do what @Dashrender is saying and thoughts on which ones to try.

                              Boxes is weird, but yes. Throw Fedora or Ubuntu onto a laptop or desktop, install KVM, and virtualize anything that you want. You get a fully functional, and gorgeous desktop environment, but can test any server OS or alternative desktop OS that you like.

                              sounds like the likely chose..
                              I know they're out there; anyone got the link for the guides?

                              for installing KVM ;
                              I'll start another list of projects that I'm going to work on and go from there

                              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                                last edited by

                                @JaredBusch said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                                The best thing is to run a full Linux desktop that makes every point and click the same as windows.

                                The point is to make the day to day tasks transparent in the change.

                                Cinnamon isn't totally identical, but it gives the same look and feel to Windows 7.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @WrCombs
                                  last edited by

                                  @WrCombs said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                                  @WrCombs said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                                  @scottalanmiller said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                                  @WrCombs said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                                  @Dashrender said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                                  Back to the OP.

                                  @WrCombs wants to things most likely...

                                  a desktop environment to run in - So Fedora or Ubuntu most likely... and then a separate "server" box to install Linux Server OSes on to experiment with to do things like - setup FreePBX, setup NC, setup file server, etc.

                                  yes.
                                  I could even VM those, right? or no? - Forgive the newbness, but I'm thinking a Desktop and then run a VM Boxes with server OS's to do what @Dashrender is saying and thoughts on which ones to try.

                                  Boxes is weird, but yes. Throw Fedora or Ubuntu onto a laptop or desktop, install KVM, and virtualize anything that you want. You get a fully functional, and gorgeous desktop environment, but can test any server OS or alternative desktop OS that you like.

                                  sounds like the likely chose..
                                  I know they're out there; anyone got the link for the guides?

                                  for installing KVM ;
                                  I'll start another list of projects that I'm going to work on and go from there

                                  https://computingforgeeks.com/how-to-install-kvm-on-fedora/

                                  WrCombsW JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • WrCombsW
                                    WrCombs @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                                    @WrCombs said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                                    @WrCombs said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                                    @scottalanmiller said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                                    @WrCombs said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                                    @Dashrender said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                                    Back to the OP.

                                    @WrCombs wants to things most likely...

                                    a desktop environment to run in - So Fedora or Ubuntu most likely... and then a separate "server" box to install Linux Server OSes on to experiment with to do things like - setup FreePBX, setup NC, setup file server, etc.

                                    yes.
                                    I could even VM those, right? or no? - Forgive the newbness, but I'm thinking a Desktop and then run a VM Boxes with server OS's to do what @Dashrender is saying and thoughts on which ones to try.

                                    Boxes is weird, but yes. Throw Fedora or Ubuntu onto a laptop or desktop, install KVM, and virtualize anything that you want. You get a fully functional, and gorgeous desktop environment, but can test any server OS or alternative desktop OS that you like.

                                    sounds like the likely chose..
                                    I know they're out there; anyone got the link for the guides?

                                    for installing KVM ;
                                    I'll start another list of projects that I'm going to work on and go from there

                                    https://computingforgeeks.com/how-to-install-kvm-on-fedora/

                                    thank ya

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      And here is Fedora 30 Cinnamon...

                                      https://spins.fedoraproject.org/cinnamon/download/index.html

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        Fedora 31 should be out around next week. It was due this week, but has been slightly delayed.

                                        WrCombsW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • WrCombsW
                                          WrCombs @scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          @scottalanmiller said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                                          Fedora 31 should be out around next week. It was due this week, but has been slightly delayed.

                                          *should I stick with 30 or move to 31? *
                                          /typed then face palmed

                                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @WrCombs
                                            last edited by

                                            @WrCombs said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                                            @scottalanmiller said in Linux OS Thoughts?:

                                            Fedora 31 should be out around next week. It was due this week, but has been slightly delayed.

                                            *should I stick with 30 or move to 31? *
                                            /typed then face palmed

                                            Install 30, update to 31 in a few days. The update process is educational, too.

                                            WrCombsW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 2 / 4
                                            • First post
                                              Last post