ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Miscellaneous Tech News

    News
    83
    7.4k
    2.6m
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @dafyre
      last edited by

      @dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      Will have to do some reading to see what's changed in last few years. I admit I have not kept up with it.

      BtrFS has been the "future" filesystem for Linux for years. But it's not been far enough along for most places to put into production yet. It's just getting to that point, now. That's why it is going to desktops, but not servers, at this point. This is the stage prior to it starting to replace XFS and EXT4 in production servers.

      We had it in production here on several systems. We suffered no end of FS corruption, and snapshots that won't delete for various reasons...systems randomly hanging and going down... We've upgraded all of the systems to newer OSes and use EXT4.

      Why EXT4 and not XFS? XFS is the mature, stable, fast one.

      Why were you using BtrFS in production? It's not considered ready even now, let alone anytime in the past. It's hoped to be classified as production in 1-2 years.

      dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @1337
        last edited by

        @Pete-S said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        As you said, Fedora users are just beta testers for real production use.

        Fedora DESKTOP, not Fedora.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @1337
          last edited by

          @Pete-S said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

          Consider it production ready when it ends up in RHEL.

          No, that's when it's old. When it is in Fedora Server is when it's production.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • dafyreD
            dafyre @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

            @dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

            @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

            @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

            Will have to do some reading to see what's changed in last few years. I admit I have not kept up with it.

            BtrFS has been the "future" filesystem for Linux for years. But it's not been far enough along for most places to put into production yet. It's just getting to that point, now. That's why it is going to desktops, but not servers, at this point. This is the stage prior to it starting to replace XFS and EXT4 in production servers.

            We had it in production here on several systems. We suffered no end of FS corruption, and snapshots that won't delete for various reasons...systems randomly hanging and going down... We've upgraded all of the systems to newer OSes and use EXT4.

            Why EXT4 and not XFS? XFS is the mature, stable, fast one.

            Why were you using BtrFS in production? It's not considered ready even now, let alone anytime in the past. It's hoped to be classified as production in 1-2 years.

            For the same reason that Fedora is trying to push it now... The vendor (SuSE, for us) thought it was a good idea to push as a sensible default at the time.

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @dafyre
              last edited by

              @dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

              @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

              @dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

              @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

              @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

              Will have to do some reading to see what's changed in last few years. I admit I have not kept up with it.

              BtrFS has been the "future" filesystem for Linux for years. But it's not been far enough along for most places to put into production yet. It's just getting to that point, now. That's why it is going to desktops, but not servers, at this point. This is the stage prior to it starting to replace XFS and EXT4 in production servers.

              We had it in production here on several systems. We suffered no end of FS corruption, and snapshots that won't delete for various reasons...systems randomly hanging and going down... We've upgraded all of the systems to newer OSes and use EXT4.

              Why EXT4 and not XFS? XFS is the mature, stable, fast one.

              Why were you using BtrFS in production? It's not considered ready even now, let alone anytime in the past. It's hoped to be classified as production in 1-2 years.

              For the same reason that Fedora is trying to push it now... The vendor (SuSE, for us) thought it was a good idea to push as a sensible default at the time.

              Fedora isn't pushing now, that's for desktops. Where those things don't really matter. And BtrFS has been pretty stable for a while now. No idea what Suse was up to, but blindly taking defaults is never a good idea. That's how people got RAID 5 from Dell for years. Another example of a commonly bad default... EXT4. In that case, it's stable, it's just not as stable or as fast.

              dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • warren.stanleyW
                warren.stanley @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller Agreed - I am looking forward to trying this on the Desktop side of things. Having the Fedora guys behind it should help with its implementation.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • dafyreD
                  dafyre @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                  @dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                  @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                  @dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                  @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                  @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                  Will have to do some reading to see what's changed in last few years. I admit I have not kept up with it.

                  BtrFS has been the "future" filesystem for Linux for years. But it's not been far enough along for most places to put into production yet. It's just getting to that point, now. That's why it is going to desktops, but not servers, at this point. This is the stage prior to it starting to replace XFS and EXT4 in production servers.

                  We had it in production here on several systems. We suffered no end of FS corruption, and snapshots that won't delete for various reasons...systems randomly hanging and going down... We've upgraded all of the systems to newer OSes and use EXT4.

                  Why EXT4 and not XFS? XFS is the mature, stable, fast one.

                  Why were you using BtrFS in production? It's not considered ready even now, let alone anytime in the past. It's hoped to be classified as production in 1-2 years.

                  For the same reason that Fedora is trying to push it now... The vendor (SuSE, for us) thought it was a good idea to push as a sensible default at the time.

                  Fedora isn't pushing now, that's for desktops. Where those things don't really matter. And BtrFS has been pretty stable for a while now. No idea what Suse was up to, but blindly taking defaults is never a good idea. That's how people got RAID 5 from Dell for years. Another example of a commonly bad default... EXT4. In that case, it's stable, it's just not as stable or as fast.

                  Hmm... I'd like to think that things on desktops do matter, lol. Kinda hard to use Linux to watch videos or play games if my FS is corrupted and not working.

                  I do hope it is stable for those who do use it, at least.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • black3dynamiteB
                    black3dynamite @1337
                    last edited by

                    @Pete-S said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                    @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                    @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                    Will have to do some reading to see what's changed in last few years. I admit I have not kept up with it.

                    BtrFS has been the "future" filesystem for Linux for years. But it's not been far enough along for most places to put into production yet. It's just getting to that point, now. That's why it is going to desktops, but not servers, at this point. This is the stage prior to it starting to replace XFS and EXT4 in production servers.

                    It's Facebook that have had problems with scaling xfs and invested a lot in btrfs.
                    As you said, Fedora users are just beta testers for real production use. Consider it production ready when it ends up in RHEL.

                    I read this a couple of weeks ago. Has some more info: https://lwn.net/Articles/824855/

                    OpenSuse uses Btrfs by default.

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @black3dynamite
                      last edited by

                      @black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                      @Pete-S said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                      @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                      @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                      Will have to do some reading to see what's changed in last few years. I admit I have not kept up with it.

                      BtrFS has been the "future" filesystem for Linux for years. But it's not been far enough along for most places to put into production yet. It's just getting to that point, now. That's why it is going to desktops, but not servers, at this point. This is the stage prior to it starting to replace XFS and EXT4 in production servers.

                      It's Facebook that have had problems with scaling xfs and invested a lot in btrfs.
                      As you said, Fedora users are just beta testers for real production use. Consider it production ready when it ends up in RHEL.

                      I read this a couple of weeks ago. Has some more info: https://lwn.net/Articles/824855/

                      OpenSuse uses Btrfs by default.

                      Still today?

                      black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • black3dynamiteB
                        black3dynamite @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by black3dynamite

                        @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                        @black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                        @Pete-S said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                        @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                        Will have to do some reading to see what's changed in last few years. I admit I have not kept up with it.

                        BtrFS has been the "future" filesystem for Linux for years. But it's not been far enough along for most places to put into production yet. It's just getting to that point, now. That's why it is going to desktops, but not servers, at this point. This is the stage prior to it starting to replace XFS and EXT4 in production servers.

                        It's Facebook that have had problems with scaling xfs and invested a lot in btrfs.
                        As you said, Fedora users are just beta testers for real production use. Consider it production ready when it ends up in RHEL.

                        I read this a couple of weeks ago. Has some more info: https://lwn.net/Articles/824855/

                        OpenSuse uses Btrfs by default.

                        Still today?

                        2a5b4450-1788-4bad-b213-7c752cb02a30-image.png

                        d5b5ac5d-045b-49d4-9741-44ad2433322b-image.png

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • mlnewsM
                          mlnews
                          last edited by

                          Coronavirus: Scotland developing its own contact-tracing app

                          Scotland is developing its own coronavirus contact-tracing app, which it hopes to have ready for use in the autumn.
                          It follows the failure of an NHS-branded app in England, which was trialled on the Isle of Wight. On Thursday, Northern Ireland became the first part of the UK to deploy a contact-tracing app. Both Scotland and Northern Ireland decided to adapt software already being used in the Republic of Ireland. Contact-tracing apps are designed to help prevent a second wave of the coronavirus. They work by logging when two people have been in close proximity to each other for a substantial period of time. If one of the users is later diagnosed as having the disease, an alert can be sent to others they have recently been close to, telling them that they should also get tested and/or self-isolate.

                          DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @black3dynamite
                            last edited by

                            @black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                            @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                            @black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                            @Pete-S said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                            @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                            @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                            Will have to do some reading to see what's changed in last few years. I admit I have not kept up with it.

                            BtrFS has been the "future" filesystem for Linux for years. But it's not been far enough along for most places to put into production yet. It's just getting to that point, now. That's why it is going to desktops, but not servers, at this point. This is the stage prior to it starting to replace XFS and EXT4 in production servers.

                            It's Facebook that have had problems with scaling xfs and invested a lot in btrfs.
                            As you said, Fedora users are just beta testers for real production use. Consider it production ready when it ends up in RHEL.

                            I read this a couple of weeks ago. Has some more info: https://lwn.net/Articles/824855/

                            OpenSuse uses Btrfs by default.

                            Still today?

                            2a5b4450-1788-4bad-b213-7c752cb02a30-image.png

                            d5b5ac5d-045b-49d4-9741-44ad2433322b-image.png

                            Even Leap, wow!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • DashrenderD
                              Dashrender @mlnews
                              last edited by

                              @mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                              Coronavirus: Scotland developing its own contact-tracing app

                              Scotland is developing its own coronavirus contact-tracing app, which it hopes to have ready for use in the autumn.
                              It follows the failure of an NHS-branded app in England, which was trialled on the Isle of Wight. On Thursday, Northern Ireland became the first part of the UK to deploy a contact-tracing app. Both Scotland and Northern Ireland decided to adapt software already being used in the Republic of Ireland. Contact-tracing apps are designed to help prevent a second wave of the coronavirus. They work by logging when two people have been in close proximity to each other for a substantial period of time. If one of the users is later diagnosed as having the disease, an alert can be sent to others they have recently been close to, telling them that they should also get tested and/or self-isolate.

                              Is there any evidence that this actually helps with anything?

                              scottalanmillerS JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                last edited by

                                @Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                @mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                Coronavirus: Scotland developing its own contact-tracing app

                                Scotland is developing its own coronavirus contact-tracing app, which it hopes to have ready for use in the autumn.
                                It follows the failure of an NHS-branded app in England, which was trialled on the Isle of Wight. On Thursday, Northern Ireland became the first part of the UK to deploy a contact-tracing app. Both Scotland and Northern Ireland decided to adapt software already being used in the Republic of Ireland. Contact-tracing apps are designed to help prevent a second wave of the coronavirus. They work by logging when two people have been in close proximity to each other for a substantial period of time. If one of the users is later diagnosed as having the disease, an alert can be sent to others they have recently been close to, telling them that they should also get tested and/or self-isolate.

                                Is there any evidence that this actually helps with anything?

                                Beyond common sense? Yes...

                                https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS2468-2667(20)30157-2/fulltext

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • JaredBuschJ
                                  JaredBusch @Dashrender
                                  last edited by

                                  @Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                  @mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                  Coronavirus: Scotland developing its own contact-tracing app

                                  Scotland is developing its own coronavirus contact-tracing app, which it hopes to have ready for use in the autumn.
                                  It follows the failure of an NHS-branded app in England, which was trialled on the Isle of Wight. On Thursday, Northern Ireland became the first part of the UK to deploy a contact-tracing app. Both Scotland and Northern Ireland decided to adapt software already being used in the Republic of Ireland. Contact-tracing apps are designed to help prevent a second wave of the coronavirus. They work by logging when two people have been in close proximity to each other for a substantial period of time. If one of the users is later diagnosed as having the disease, an alert can be sent to others they have recently been close to, telling them that they should also get tested and/or self-isolate.

                                  Is there any evidence that this actually helps with anything?

                                  FFS, contact tracing is a not a new thing. It has long been a known useful tool when dealing with contagions

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • black3dynamiteB
                                    black3dynamite
                                    last edited by

                                    https://www.windowscentral.com/3-reasons-why-tiktok-microsoft

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      https://www.tomshardware.com/news/raspberry-pi-weasley-family-clock-from-harry-potter-runs-like-magic

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • mlnewsM
                                        mlnews
                                        last edited by

                                        Call for TikTok security check before HQ decision

                                        An influential backbench MP has called on the government to carry out a security review of TikTok before its Chinese owner decides whether to base the app in the UK.
                                        Neil O'Brien - co-founder of the China Research Group of Tory MPs - said the intelligence services should publish a report into the matter. President Trump is threatening to ban TikTok in the US. This has forced the app to ditch plans to establish its headquarters there. TikTok had been expected to pick California or New York - where it already has offices - after appointing an American ex-Disney executive as its chief executive in May. However, the US president has since given it an ultimatum to sell its local business to an American firm.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • mlnewsM
                                          mlnews
                                          last edited by

                                          Twitter users urged to update over Android security flaw

                                          Millions of Twitter users will be asked to update their Android app after the company found a security flaw.
                                          Twitter said the vulnerability could let other malicious apps access private information such as direct messages. It said most users were already protected by an Android security update, but 4% were still vulnerable. Twitter said anyone still affected by this flaw would get an in-app notification "to let them know if they need to do anything". "We don't have evidence that this vulnerability was exploited by attackers," it added. But it acknowledged "we can't be completely sure" and was taking the highly unusual steps "to keep the small group of potentially vulnerable people safe".

                                          GreyG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • GreyG
                                            Grey @mlnews
                                            last edited by

                                            @mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                            Twitter users urged to update over Android security flaw

                                            Millions of Twitter users will be asked to update their Android app after the company found a security flaw.
                                            Twitter said the vulnerability could let other malicious apps access private information such as direct messages. It said most users were already protected by an Android security update, but 4% were still vulnerable. Twitter said anyone still affected by this flaw would get an in-app notification "to let them know if they need to do anything". "We don't have evidence that this vulnerability was exploited by attackers," it added. But it acknowledged "we can't be completely sure" and was taking the highly unusual steps "to keep the small group of potentially vulnerable people safe".

                                            Or just don't use the twitter app.

                                            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 318
                                            • 319
                                            • 320
                                            • 321
                                            • 322
                                            • 372
                                            • 373
                                            • 320 / 373
                                            • First post
                                              Last post