ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Miscellaneous Tech News

    News
    83
    7.4k
    2.6m
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • 1
      1337 @scottalanmiller
      last edited by 1337

      @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @Pete-S said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @Pete-S said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @warren-stanley said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @scottalanmiller 16GB Pi .... still blows my mind

      What the thing needs is SATA or M.2 or eMMC (embedded flash storage).
      16GB or something would go a long way.

      Storage is a big bottle neck. The microSD is slooooooooow.

      That's what I've been saying. One of their big competitors is only interesting because it has an M.2 option. That's the ONLY thing lacking. Now you CAN get a pretty decent storage option by attaching an SSD via USB 3, but that's ridiculous and there is no easily accessible port to do that with.

      Already Asus's Tinker Board version 2 (called S) had 16GB embedded flash. So it's not like there isn't any space for it or it's very expensive.
      chart-4-01.png

      16GB embedded is... meh. Nice but, I want a drive connector.

      Ideally both, but perhaps embedded flash is more realistic because that is what every device with similar hardware has - smartphone, tablet, chromebook etc. It would work fine as a boot device and for smaller systems.

      1 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • 1
        1337 @1337
        last edited by 1337

        @Pete-S said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        @Pete-S said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        @Pete-S said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        @warren-stanley said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        @scottalanmiller 16GB Pi .... still blows my mind

        What the thing needs is SATA or M.2 or eMMC (embedded flash storage).
        16GB or something would go a long way.

        Storage is a big bottle neck. The microSD is slooooooooow.

        That's what I've been saying. One of their big competitors is only interesting because it has an M.2 option. That's the ONLY thing lacking. Now you CAN get a pretty decent storage option by attaching an SSD via USB 3, but that's ridiculous and there is no easily accessible port to do that with.

        Already Asus's Tinker Board version 2 (called S) had 16GB embedded flash. So it's not like there isn't any space for it or it's very expensive.
        chart-4-01.png

        16GB embedded is... meh. Nice but, I want a drive connector.

        Ideally both, but perhaps embedded flash is more realistic because that is what every device with similar hardware has - smartphone, tablet, chromebook etc. It would work fine as a boot device and for smaller systems.

        They also have embedded flash already on the RPI compute modules, which is basically a RPI without ports. So they already have the design ready to go.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • nadnerBN
          nadnerB
          last edited by

          Garmin services and production go down after ransomware attack
          https://www.zdnet.com/article/garmin-services-and-production-go-down-after-ransomware-attack/
          https://www.forbes.com/sites/leemathews/2020/07/23/garmins-alleged-ransomware-wastedlocker-evil-corp/#14378b9f156d

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • mlnewsM
            mlnews
            last edited by

            Facebook takes the EU to court over privacy spat

            Facebook has pushed back against a European Union investigation into its practices, taking it to court over privacy concerns.
            Two investigations are being carried out into Facebook to find out if it breaches competition laws. To gather information, the European Commission has demanded internal documents from Facebook that include 2,500 specific key phrases. Facebook says that means handing over unrelated but highly sensitive data. The European Commission says it will defend the case in court, and its investigation into Facebook's potential anticompetitive conduct is ongoing. The social media giant has filed an appeal to the EU courts, arguing against the breadth of the document requests.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • mlnewsM
              mlnews
              last edited by

              Wiley: Rapper deleted from Facebook after abuse of Jewish critics

              Facebook has deleted the personal account of rapper Wiley after he shared abusive posts aimed at his Jewish critics.
              His comments came after an anti-Semitic tirade on Twitter on Friday. The BBC found posts on Facebook under his real name Richard Kylea Cowie. He specifically named Jewish celebrities - including Lord Alan Sugar, comedian David Baddiel and BBC presenter Emma Barnett. A Facebook spokesperson said Wiley's account was removed for "repeated violations" of its policies. It initially suspended, then deleted the grime artist's Facebook and Instagram profiles. The BBC has contacted the musician for comment. The posts aimed abuse at Jewish celebrities who had expressed their dismay about Wiley's tweets. Several of his posts mentioned "Golders Green" - a London neighbourhood with a large Jewish community.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DanpD
                Danp
                last edited by

                https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/dell-emc-patches-idrac/

                A vulnerability in the Integrated Dell Remote Access Controller (iDRAC) that could have allowed cyber-criminals to gain full control of server operations has been detected

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • warren.stanleyW
                  warren.stanley
                  last edited by

                  Fedora 33 & BTRFS default

                  Desktop only at this stage(?)

                  scottalanmillerS dafyreD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @warren.stanley
                    last edited by

                    @warren-stanley said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                    Fedora 33 & BTRFS default

                    Desktop only at this stage(?)

                    Interesting

                    warren.stanleyW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • dafyreD
                      dafyre @warren.stanley
                      last edited by

                      @warren-stanley said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                      Fedora 33 & BTRFS default

                      Desktop only at this stage(?)

                      I haven't used BTRFS in a long time... My advise is run... as far and as fast as you can, lol.

                      DustinB3403D scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jmooreJ
                        jmoore
                        last edited by

                        Yeah isn't btrfs a really old filesystem that no one really uses anymore or am I thinking of something else?

                        DustinB3403D scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DustinB3403D
                          DustinB3403 @dafyre
                          last edited by

                          @dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                          @warren-stanley said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                          Fedora 33 & BTRFS default

                          Desktop only at this stage(?)

                          I haven't used BTRFS in a long time... My advise is run... as far and as fast as you can, lol.

                          Well that clearly is not at all accurate if Fedora is working to push it as the default.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DustinB3403D
                            DustinB3403 @jmoore
                            last edited by

                            @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                            Yeah isn't btrfs a really old filesystem that no one really uses anymore or am I thinking of something else?

                            BTRFS has been around for a long time, yes

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • jmooreJ
                              jmoore
                              last edited by

                              Will have to do some reading to see what's changed in last few years. I admit I have not kept up with it.

                              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @dafyre
                                last edited by

                                @dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                @warren-stanley said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                Fedora 33 & BTRFS default

                                Desktop only at this stage(?)

                                I haven't used BTRFS in a long time... My advise is run... as far and as fast as you can, lol.

                                Why, I've had nothing but good luck with it.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @jmoore
                                  last edited by

                                  @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                  Yeah isn't btrfs a really old filesystem that no one really uses anymore or am I thinking of something else?

                                  It's the most up to date and modern filesystem with any widespread use. Literally every filesystem you know is much older except for maybe ReFS.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                                    last edited by

                                    @DustinB3403 said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                    @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                    Yeah isn't btrfs a really old filesystem that no one really uses anymore or am I thinking of something else?

                                    BTRFS has been around for a long time, yes

                                    In total years, yes. Compared to any other filesystem, no. I think you guys are thinking of Reiser.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @jmoore
                                      last edited by

                                      @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                      Will have to do some reading to see what's changed in last few years. I admit I have not kept up with it.

                                      BtrFS has been the "future" filesystem for Linux for years. But it's not been far enough along for most places to put into production yet. It's just getting to that point, now. That's why it is going to desktops, but not servers, at this point. This is the stage prior to it starting to replace XFS and EXT4 in production servers.

                                      1 dafyreD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • 1
                                        1337 @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by 1337

                                        @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                        @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                        Will have to do some reading to see what's changed in last few years. I admit I have not kept up with it.

                                        BtrFS has been the "future" filesystem for Linux for years. But it's not been far enough along for most places to put into production yet. It's just getting to that point, now. That's why it is going to desktops, but not servers, at this point. This is the stage prior to it starting to replace XFS and EXT4 in production servers.

                                        It's Facebook that have had problems with scaling xfs and invested a lot in btrfs.
                                        As you said, Fedora users are just beta testers for real production use. Consider it production ready when it ends up in RHEL.

                                        I read this a couple of weeks ago. Has some more info: https://lwn.net/Articles/824855/

                                        scottalanmillerS black3dynamiteB 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • dafyreD
                                          dafyre @scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                          @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                          Will have to do some reading to see what's changed in last few years. I admit I have not kept up with it.

                                          BtrFS has been the "future" filesystem for Linux for years. But it's not been far enough along for most places to put into production yet. It's just getting to that point, now. That's why it is going to desktops, but not servers, at this point. This is the stage prior to it starting to replace XFS and EXT4 in production servers.

                                          We had it in production here on several systems. We suffered no end of FS corruption, and snapshots that won't delete for various reasons...systems randomly hanging and going down... We've upgraded all of the systems to newer OSes and use EXT4.

                                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @dafyre
                                            last edited by

                                            @dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                            @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                            @jmoore said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                            Will have to do some reading to see what's changed in last few years. I admit I have not kept up with it.

                                            BtrFS has been the "future" filesystem for Linux for years. But it's not been far enough along for most places to put into production yet. It's just getting to that point, now. That's why it is going to desktops, but not servers, at this point. This is the stage prior to it starting to replace XFS and EXT4 in production servers.

                                            We had it in production here on several systems. We suffered no end of FS corruption, and snapshots that won't delete for various reasons...systems randomly hanging and going down... We've upgraded all of the systems to newer OSes and use EXT4.

                                            Why EXT4 and not XFS? XFS is the mature, stable, fast one.

                                            Why were you using BtrFS in production? It's not considered ready even now, let alone anytime in the past. It's hoped to be classified as production in 1-2 years.

                                            dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 315
                                            • 316
                                            • 317
                                            • 318
                                            • 319
                                            • 372
                                            • 373
                                            • 317 / 373
                                            • First post
                                              Last post