What Are You Doing Right Now
-
Got my PureCon (its actually called Pure Accelerate, but I'm calling it PureCon) ticket, just booked plane tickets and the hotel. This thing is actually happening.
-
@NerdyDad said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Got my PureCon (its actually called Pure Accelerate, but I'm calling it PureCon) ticket, just booked plane tickets and the hotel. This thing is actually happening.
Not to be confused with PurCon, the convention for old lonely spinsters.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@NerdyDad said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Got my PureCon (its actually called Pure Accelerate, but I'm calling it PureCon) ticket, just booked plane tickets and the hotel. This thing is actually happening.
Not to be confused with PurCon, the convention for old lonely spinsters.
I thought that one was about a water filter.
-
I'm drawing up some generic quotes for server systems, still considering options and choices.
Support etc.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
PurCon
Reading through the "What Can I Bring?" page on the TSA website and some of this stuff is like "Somebody must have attempted it at least once before to be put on this list."
Some of the things that I have already found are:
- Gravy (yes, the liquid that you put on food such as mashed potatoes or chicken fried steak)
- Fidget Spinners (already has made the list)
- Duct Tape (well that must have been an interesting trip)
- Dynamite (really? Who are you, Yosemite Sam?)
-
Literal excerpt:
Light Saber
Sadly, the technology doesn't currently exist to create a real light saber. However, you can pack a toy light saber in your carry-on or checked bag. May the force be with you. -
@NerdyDad said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Literal excerpt:
Light Saber
Sadly, the technology doesn't currently exist to create a real light saber. However, you can pack a toy light saber in your carry-on or checked bag. May the force be with you.Little do they know....
-
Reading about SR-IOV
-
Flight booked for mangocon 2017!!!
-
-
I'm continuously amazed how on SW you can go a month without a specific question then two the same one just minutes apart. It's like nearly all discussions come in waves, but from disconnected people. I don't understand the effect.
Example is today there are two topics that popped up within ten minutes of each other... both are looking at if connecting iSCSI directly to a VM to bypass the datastore is a wise idea. I've not seen that come up in weeks or months, but two in a few minutes. Chances are, another will happen later today.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
I'm continuously amazed how on SW you can go a month without a specific question then two the same one just minutes apart. It's like nearly all discussions come in waves, but from disconnected people. I don't understand the effect.
Example is today there are two topics that popped up within ten minutes of each other... both are looking at if connecting iSCSI directly to a VM to bypass the datastore is a wise idea. I've not seen that come up in weeks or months, but two in a few minutes. Chances are, another will happen later today.
Link?
From what I've learned, it seems like the way to utilize iSCSI storage for a VM is to connect the iSCSI storage to the hypervisor and put a VHD on it for the VM to use, rather than trying to connecting iSCSI directly to a VM.
I am using iSCSI storage for the VHD that's the "data" drive for a VM that's a file server (among other things). For a couple of days, my iSCSI storage will be used for all of my VHDs while the new local RAID 10 initializes. Then my iSCSI storage will be for backups.
-
@EddieJennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
From what I've learned, it seems like the way to utilize iSCSI storage for a VM is to connect the iSCSI storage to the hypervisor and put a VHD on it for the VM to use, rather than trying to connecting iSCSI directly to a VM.
Exactly, otherwise you break snaps and take visibility out of the hands of the hypervisor.
-
Updated the deployment image at one client.
Now setting up a Fedora 26 VM to try this Nginx-Extras on.
-
@EddieJennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
For a couple of days, my iSCSI storage will be used for all of my VHDs while the new local RAID 10 initializes.
Where days = minutes, I hope. What kind of initialization is that?
-
@JaredBusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Updated the deployment image at one client.
Now setting up a Fedora 26 VM to try this Nginx-Extras on.
Alpha still, but barely.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@EddieJennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
For a couple of days, my iSCSI storage will be used for all of my VHDs while the new local RAID 10 initializes.
Where days = minutes, I hope. What kind of initialization is that?
However long it'll take the PERC710 controller on my Dell T620 to get the new array ready. I hope it's minutes.
-
@JaredBusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@JaredBusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Updated the deployment image at one client.
Now setting up a Fedora 26 VM to try this Nginx-Extras on.
Alpha still, but barely.
I didn't realize that 26 was so close to production release.
-
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@JaredBusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@JaredBusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Updated the deployment image at one client.
Now setting up a Fedora 26 VM to try this Nginx-Extras on.
Alpha still, but barely.
I didn't realize that 26 was so close to production release.
It's only a six month cycle. The next one is never very far away.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@EddieJennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
From what I've learned, it seems like the way to utilize iSCSI storage for a VM is to connect the iSCSI storage to the hypervisor and put a VHD on it for the VM to use, rather than trying to connecting iSCSI directly to a VM.
Exactly, otherwise you break snaps and take visibility out of the hands of the hypervisor.
Having done things both ways, it's definitely better to let the Hypervisor handle the underlying disks.
